Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.751
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal CENDIKIA ISNU Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Journal of Constitutional, Law and Human Rights
Zulfarhan ibrahim harahap
Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
Religion Arts Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
The Effectiveness of Arbitration as an Alternative to Business Dispute Resolution: Between Procedural Efficiency and Certainty of Adjudication Refli Attalariq Pane; Raihan Ryanta Akbar; Ahmad Syahbuddin Ritonga; Ibnu Zarir; Zulfarhan Ibrahim Harahap
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Vol 1. No 2 Sept 2024 : JCISNU
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v1i2.253

Abstract

The development of increasingly complex business activities demands a dispute resolution mechanism that is not only able to provide legal certainty, but also ensure the efficiency of the case settlement process. Arbitration is present as an alternative dispute resolution that offers procedural flexibility, confidentiality, and faster resolution than litigation. However, the effectiveness of arbitration is not only determined by procedural efficiency, but also by the certainty of the implementation of the award. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of arbitration as an alternative to business dispute resolution by focusing on the relationship between procedural efficiency and the certainty of award implementation in the Indonesian legal system. The research uses a normative juridical method with a legislative approach and a conceptual approach. The legal materials used include primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials that are analyzed qualitatively through prescriptive analysis methods. The results of the study show that arbitration has advantages in the form of more flexible procedures, relatively fast dispute resolution, process secrecy, and freedom of the parties to choose arbitrators who have competence according to the character of business disputes. Nonetheless, the effectiveness of arbitration has not been fully determined by procedural efficiency as the implementation of awards still depends on the support of judicial institutions, particularly in the process of execution and annulment of arbitral awards. Therefore, the effectiveness of arbitration can only be realized if procedural efficiency goes hand in hand with the certainty of the implementation of the award through the consistent application  of the principle of final and binding and the limitation of court intervention in accordance with the provisions of laws and regulations.
The Effectiveness of Arbitration as an Alternative to Business Dispute Resolution: Between Procedural Efficiency and Certainty of Adjudication Refli Attalariq Pane; Raihan Ryanta Akbar; Ahmad Syahbuddin Ritonga; Ibnu Zarir; Zulfarhan Ibrahim Harahap
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Vol 1. No 2 Sept 2024 : JCISNU
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v1i2.253

Abstract

The development of increasingly complex business activities demands a dispute resolution mechanism that is not only able to provide legal certainty, but also ensure the efficiency of the case settlement process. Arbitration is present as an alternative dispute resolution that offers procedural flexibility, confidentiality, and faster resolution than litigation. However, the effectiveness of arbitration is not only determined by procedural efficiency, but also by the certainty of the implementation of the award. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of arbitration as an alternative to business dispute resolution by focusing on the relationship between procedural efficiency and the certainty of award implementation in the Indonesian legal system. The research uses a normative juridical method with a legislative approach and a conceptual approach. The legal materials used include primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials that are analyzed qualitatively through prescriptive analysis methods. The results of the study show that arbitration has advantages in the form of more flexible procedures, relatively fast dispute resolution, process secrecy, and freedom of the parties to choose arbitrators who have competence according to the character of business disputes. Nonetheless, the effectiveness of arbitration has not been fully determined by procedural efficiency as the implementation of awards still depends on the support of judicial institutions, particularly in the process of execution and annulment of arbitral awards. Therefore, the effectiveness of arbitration can only be realized if procedural efficiency goes hand in hand with the certainty of the implementation of the award through the consistent application  of the principle of final and binding and the limitation of court intervention in accordance with the provisions of laws and regulations.
Analisis Kendala Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Yofiza Yofiza; Ahmad Muharrom; David Kurniawan; Refli Attalariq; Zulfarhan Ibrahim Harahap; Ibnu Zarir
Journal of Constitutional, Law and Human Rights Vol 1, No 2 (2025): September 2025
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/jclhr.v1i2.5380

Abstract

Tindak pidana pencucian uang telah berkembang menjadi ancaman yang signifikan bagi stabilitas ekonomi, keuangan, dan keamanan suatu negara. Penegakan hukum terhadap kejahatan ini menghadapi banyak tantangan dari segi regulasi, institusi, dan kolaborasi internasional. Metode normatif digunakan dalam penelitian ini untuk menganalisis kerangka hukum saat ini dan kendala utama yang dihadapi dalam pelaksanaannya di Indonesia. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan keterbatasan teknologi, kekurangan sumber daya manusia, dan ketidaksesuaian regulasi nasional dan internasional. Selain itu, penelitian ini menyarankan cara-cara untuk mengatasi masalah tersebut. Misalnya, kerangka hukum harus diperkuat, teknologi canggih harus diadopsi, dan koordinasi antarinstansi harus ditingkatkan.
Co-Authors Ahmad Muharrom Ahmad syahbuddin ritonga David kurniawan Ibnu zarir Raihan Ryanta Akbar Refli Attalariq Refli attalariq pane Yofiza Yofiza