Nurbela br. Purba
Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Optimalisasi Pelayanan Hukum Di Pengadilan Tinggi Agama: Studi Kasus Implementasi Prosedur Dan Penyelesaian Perkara Keluarga Di Pengadilan Tinggi Agama Medan Gloria Gita Putri Ginting; Nurbela br. Purba; Nur Asiah; Satya Eka Putri; naufal arif pratama
Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Disiplin Ilmu (JPMASDI) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Multi Disiplin Ilmu
Publisher : Information Technology and Science (ITScience)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47709/jpmasdi.v2i2.4464

Abstract

Latar Belakang : Pengadilan Tinggi Agama memiliki peran krusial dalam penyelesaian perkara keluarga di masyarakat. Studi ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi dan meningkatkan optimalisasi pelayanan hukum di Pengadilan Tinggi Agama Medan, dengan fokus pada implementasi prosedur dan penyelesaian perkara keluarga. Metode : Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan kualitatif melalui studi kasus, melibatkan analisis mendalam terhadap proses penyelesaian perkara keluarga, evaluasi efektivitas prosedur yang ada, serta identifikasi tantangan dan hambatan dalam pelaksanaannya. Hasil : Hasil penelitian menyoroti kebutuhan akan perbaikan sistem dalam hal efisiensi, kecepatan, dan keadilan dalam penyelesaian perkara keluarga. Temuan ini memberikan dasar untuk rekomendasi kebijakan yang bertujuan untuk meningkatkan kualitas pelayanan hukum di Pengadilan Tinggi Agama Medan, sehingga dapat memberikan keadilan yang lebih baik bagi masyarakat dalam penyelesaian masalah keluarga. Kesimpulan : Terdapat kebutuhan akan standarisasi prosedur dalam penyelesaian perkara keluarga di Pengadilan Tinggi Agama Medan untuk memastikan konsistensi, keadilan, dan efisiensi dalam pelayanan hukum. Upaya optimalisasi pelayanan hukum juga harus memperhatikan aksesibilitas bagi masyarakat, termasuk penyediaan informasi yang jelas dan pemahaman yang mudah terhadap proses hukum yang kompleks.
History of the Concept of Restorative Justice in Resolving Child Criminal Cases (Study of Besilam Village, Langkat Regency) Lidya Rahmadani Hasibuan; Syaiful Asmi Hasibuan; Nurbela Br. Purba
International Journal of Society and Law Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): December 2024
Publisher : Yayasan Multidimensi Kreatif

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61306/ijsl.v2i3.329

Abstract

The development of the concept of restorative justice in the last 20 years has experienced very rapid development in several countries such as Australia, Canada, England and Wales, New Zealand and several other countries in Europe and the Pacific region. Likewise, in the United States, as a country that more often forms associations with countries to introduce repressive measures of punishment, America cannot avoid the strong influence of the development of restorative justice. Michael Tonry in 1999 began a survey of American sentencing policies with the results of his research obtaining several The living concepts regarding punishment until now, namely 1 structured sentencing, risk-based sentencing (sentence based on risk), indeterminate (sentence that does not determine) and restorative/community justice (recovery/community justice). So restorative justice is one of the punishment concepts that has been developed and is already running in the United States.
Process of Granting Retitution Rights to Child victims of crime (study of besilam village langkat district) Lidya Rahmadani Hasibuan; Hasdiana Juwita Bintang; Nurbela Br. Purba
International Journal of Society and Law Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): December 2024
Publisher : Yayasan Multidimensi Kreatif

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

One form of compensation for victims of criminal acts is restitution. Restitution in accordance with the Principle of Restoration to its Original Condition (restutio in integrum) is an effort that ensures that crime victims must be returned to their original condition before the crime occurred, even though it is based on the fact that it is impossible for the victim to return to their original condition. This principle emphasizes that the form of recovery for victims must be as complete as possible and cover various aspects arising from the consequences of the crime. With restitution, victims can have their freedom, legal rights, social status, family life and citizenship restored, returned to their place of residence, their job restored, and their assets restored. Restitution itself is defined as the payment of compensation charged to the perpetrator based on a court decision which has permanent legal force for material and/or immaterial losses suffered by the victim or his heirs. For this reason, the perpetrator is required to pay restitution to the child victim of a crime to compensate for the losses suffered by the victim as a form of the perpetrator's responsibility for his actions which caused harm to the victim, his family or his heirs, as the implementation of Article 71 D Paragraph (2) of Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection. Applications for restitution can be submitted by child victims of criminal acts who must be accompanied by parents/guardians, their heirs or through the Institution witness and victim protection. To apply for this restitution, it is hoped that the child's companions have equipped themselves with the applicant's identity file, the identity of the perpetrator, a description of the criminal act, a description of the losses suffered, the amount of restitution requested and the form of restitution requested.