Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA WANPRESTASI PADA PERJANJIAN SEWA MENYEWA PESAWAT ANTARA HELICE LEASING S. A. S DAN ATTERISSAGE S. A. S DENGAN PT. GARUDA INDONESA TBK SECARA ARBITRASE INTERNASIONAL: PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA WANPRESTASI PADA PERJANJIAN SEWA MENYEWA PESAWAT ANTARA HELICE LEASING S. A. S DAN ATTERISSAGE S. A. S DENGAN PT. GARUDA INDONESA TBK SECARA ARBITRASE INTERNASIONAL Imas Rosidawati Wiradirja; Amanda; Eddy Setiawan; Muhammad Fauzan; Sugiarto; Nugraha Pranadita
Jurnal Media Justitia Nusantara Vol 15 No 1 (2025): Februari 2025
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Islam Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30999/mjn.v15i1.3550

Abstract

International trade disputes have been successfully settled by the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), a component of the international arbitration system. The decision of a breach of contract dispute involving an aircraft leasing agreement between Helice Leasing S.A.S (Helice) and Atterissage S.A.S (Atterissage) with PT. Garuda Indonesia Tbk (GI), decided by the LCIA, reflects this. After concluding that GI had violated the agreement, the LCIA ordered it to pay Helice and Atterissage the past-due rent as well as the remaining rent. Analysing the international arbitration procedure for resolving disputes and the award's enforcement is the goal of this research. Using a normative legal methodology, the study analyses case studies and legislation. The results show that arbitration uses a multi-step procedure to resolve disputes, including hearings, mediation or conciliation, the selection of an arbitration panel, the presentation of the parties' arguments and supporting documentation, and the arbitrator's ruling. The LCIA effectively resolved the disagreement, demonstrating the efficacy and efficiency of this approach. The enforcement of the award is permitted in Indonesia under Article 65 and Article 66 of Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution (AAPS Law), provided that the Central Jakarta District Court has recognised the arbitration award and it does not contravene public order.
Masyarakat Muslim di Bali : Dari Kawula hingga Warganegara Eddy Setiawan
Jurnal Identitas Volume 3 Number 2, September 2023
Publisher : Institut Kewarganegaraan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66109/jid.vi.6

Abstract

The arrival of outsiders with different religious and cultural backgrounds during Bali’s classical era was equally recognized as the local subjects. The patron-client relationships during this period led to a tendency towards cultural acculturation and, to some extent, spiritual syncretism which shaped Muslim-Bali. In the colonial era, the Dutch then took the position of patron from the Puri, separating Balinese and non-Balinese through desa adat and dinas. Meanwhile, the development of Islamic education has led to orthodoxy, thus completely separating the two communities. Muslim immigrants after this process are called Muslims Baru. Desa dinas had a better position during the colonial to the New Order period. However, with the decentralization process, desa dinas have become mere administrations with weak political bargaining. Balinese-Muslim and Muslims Baru citizenship seems to have to deal with a new form of citizenship in the name of customary tradition, between krama wed, krama tamiu, and tamiu. Non-Balinese Hindu citizens are classified as tamiu in the context of desa adat. Therefore, in terms of participation and redistribution, indigenous communities have a better position than those in dinas. Similarly, Balinese-Muslims have a better position because of the autonomous power through their “desa adat”. Meanwhile, Muslims Baru without “desa adat” are only members of administrative desa dinas, with limited participation, thus affecting the redistribution aspect.
Agama dan Kewarganegaraan : Minoritas Muslim dalam Masyarakat Hindu Bali Eddy Setiawan
Jurnal Identitas Volume 4 Number 1, March 2024
Publisher : Institut Kewarganegaraan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66109/jid.vi.13

Abstract

Diversity and religiosity are manifested in almost all regions of Indonesia. Practically, there is no region that is homogeneous in terms of ethnicity, language and religion. Likewise, Bali, with a Hindu majority population, also has other religious minorities, among them are Muslims. The existence of Muslims in Bali has been recorded since Bali was ruled by various kingdoms and sustained until the formation of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia. The identification process as citizens is shared by both Balinese Hindus and residents of other groups such as Muslims who form the Muslim minority on the island. Civic relations in Bali appear to be going well, as reflected in the Religious Harmony Index released by the Ministry of Religion in 2023. In the index, Bali Province scored 77.95 that makes it one of the top 5 regions with the highest index scores after East Nusa Tenggara (81,027), Papua (80,20), North Sulawesi (78,35), and West Papua (78.63). This index based its score on three indicators, namely tolerance, equality and cooperation between religious communities. This article discusses the relationship between religion and citizenship in Bali by focusing on the main issues: firstly, the value system of Balinese Hindu society which was formed by the long interactions with various entities that has shaped a tolerant character until its advancement after the Bali Bombings I and II. Secondly, the formation process of Bali’s Muslim minority and thirdly, the dynamics of the relationship between the two groups during the democratization period which was marked by decentralization and the strengthening of identity politics, by examining the interactions between the two groups on the issue of Ajeg Bali. Hereby, it is expected that the conceptualization, development and practice of religion and citizenship in Bali can offer a new insight into navigating the relationship between the different communities in Indonesia.
Cina Benteng : Identitas, Kewarganegaraan, dan Politik Rekognisi Eddy Setiawan
Jurnal Identitas Volume 4 Number 2, September 2024
Publisher : Institut Kewarganegaraan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66109/jid.vi.25

Abstract

This article examines the construction of the Cina Benteng identity in Tangerang in relation to Indonesia’s citizenship dynamics and population policy. Through a historical review—from the enactment of Law No. 3/1946, the citizenship division under the 1949 Round Table Conference, the Indonesia–PRC Dual Citizenship Treaty, to Presidential Decree No. 10/1959—this paper demonstrates how legal recognition of Chinese Indonesians often failed to translate into substantive recognition. Soemitro’s Benteng Program, the SBKRI policy under the New Order, and the practice of administrative marking inherited the colonial Staatsblad logic of racial categorization. Referring to Benhabib’s and Honneth’s theories of recognition and alienation, this paper highlights the urgency of a Single Indonesian Citizenship principle, not merely guaranteed on paper but realized through fair population administration—especially through post-Reformasi citizenship policy, the 2006 Citizenship Law, and the e-KTP system. The Cina Benteng case underlines that ethnic recognition and inclusive population governance must be integrated to realise substantive citizenship in the Indonesian context.
Resensi Buku: Mengurai Donald Trump, Populisme dan Kewarganegaraan melalui Prisma Ketidaklengkapan Eddy Setiawan
Jurnal Identitas Volume 5 Number 1, March 2025
Publisher : Institut Kewarganegaraan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66109/jid.vi.48

Abstract

Dalam gelombang krisis demokrasi global yang ditandai oleh kebangkitan pemimpin-pemimpin otoriter, narasi konspiratif, dan fragmentasi kebenaran, buku Incompleteness: Donald Trump, Populism and Citizenship karya Francis B. Nyamnjoh hadir sebagai oase intelektual yang menawarkan cara berpikir alternatif. Alih-alih mengikuti narasi Barat yang dominan yang menggambarkan populisme sebagai ancaman terhadap tatanan liberal-demokratis, Nyamnjoh mengajukan kerangka epistemologis yang berakar pada pengalaman dan filsafat Afrika: ketidaklengkapan (incompleteness). Melalui prisma ini, ia tidak hanya menganalisis fenomena Donald Trump, tetapi juga mengkritik asumsi-asumsi dasar tentang kewarganegaraan, identitas, dan kebenaran dalam masyarakat kontemporer.