Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Madani: Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal
Halimah, Lusiana
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Education Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Pengembangan Modul Ajar PAI Kelas VIII Berbasis Teka Teki Silang di SMPN 5 Bukittinggi Halimah, Lusiana; S, Supriadi; J, Junaidi; Arsya, Fajriyani
Madani: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol 3, No 2 (2025): March
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research was motivated because the teaching tools used at SMPN 5 Bukittinggi in the form of teaching modules, in the knowledge assessment component in the form of multiple choice questions and descriptions, found several weaknesses when applied, including: student learning outcomes when the application of assessments in PAI subjects is low, has not reaced KKTP, besides that the knowledge assessment applied by the teacher is less varied and the knowledge assessment applied is less interesting foe students in learning, tends to be monotonous and boring.Therefore, it is necessary to design a Crossword-based PAI Teaching Module that is valid, practical and effective. This research is a development research with the ADDIE model, consisting of five stages of development, namely analysis, design, development, implementation and evaluation. The instruments used are validity, practicality, and effectiveness  sheets in the form of questionnaires. The results showed that the teaching module was valid according to the assessment of 3 experts with an average score of 0.851; (2) the teaching module was very practical according to the assessment of 2 practitioners with a practicality percentage of 90.17%; (3) the teaching module was very effective with a percentage of effectiveness of 89.73%.
Co-Authors Arsya, Fajriyani J, Junaidi Supriadi S