Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Legal Regulation of Online Food in Indonesia: Challenges for Public Health and Its Comparison with Malaysia Laot Kian, Antonius Maria; Ginting, Febriyanti Angelia; Setyowati, Putri Ratna
Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Vol 8, No 3 (2025): July
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/jr.v8i3.48371

Abstract

This study examines the phenomenon of the rapid growth of online food services in Indonesia through platforms such as GoFood, GrabFood, and ShopeeFood. The popularity of this service is driven by the ease of ordering food, where the assessment of food preferences is often based on the reviews of other users. However, there are concerns that these reviews could be affected by bot ratings or automated systems, which can give a false positive impression. High ratings often make a food product sell better, even though it may contain health risks for consumers. The relationship between online food services and Indonesia's public health is a major concern, given the high consumption of potentially unhealthy foods. The biggest challenge is how to regulate these services in relation to public health. The absence of a law that specifically regulates online food services is a major regulatory issue. The current law only regulates the Law on Information and Electronic Transactions, which was last amended by Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2024 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions. Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection and Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 18 of 2012 concerning Food, do not also regulate in detail. Comparison with Malaysia, consumers are protected by the Food Act 1983, which requires restaurants and online food platforms to ensure food safety standards, which is more details than Indonesian regulation.
The Right To Be Forgotten According To Žižek's Paradox Laot Kian, Antonius Maria
Mimbar Hukum Vol 37 No 2 (2025): Mimbar Hukum
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/mh.v37i2.23634

Abstract

Abstract This article analyzes the paradox of implementing the right to be forgotten in Indonesia through the Lacanian psychoanalytic perspective developed by Slavoj Žižek. This study highlights the structural impossibility of completely erasing digital trace despite the existence of legal mechanisms that protect individual privacy, an issue that is increasingly relevant in the digital age. Previous studies have emphasized procedural or technical aspects, whereas this research examines the psychoanalytic and philosophical dimensions of digital forgetting. An analysis of Article 26 of the ITE Law shows that the court procedures in question produce new legal documentation, reinforcing rather than erasing digital traces. Žižek's concepts of the Real, the Symbolic, and the Imaginary show how these traces remain, creating a cycle of repetition and return of the repressed that challenges conventional legal approaches. This study concludes that the right to be forgotten cannot be fully realized through technical or procedural mechanisms, but rather through fundamental aspects of modern subjectivity, digital identity, and the limitations of law in dealing with digital reality. Abstrak Artikel ini menganalisis paradoks implementasi hak untuk dilupakan di Indonesia melalui perspektif psikoanalisis Lacanian yang dikembangkan Slavoj Žižek. Penelitian ini menyoroti ketidakmungkinan struktural untuk sepenuhnya menghapus jejak digital meskipun ada mekanisme hukum yang melindungi privasi individu, yang menjadi masalah yang semakin relevan di era digital. Studi sebelumnya lebih menekankan aspek prosedural atau teknis, sedangkan penelitian ini menelaah dimensi psikoanalitis dan filosofis dari pelupaan digital. Analisis Pasal 26 UU ITE menunjukkan bahwa prosedur pengadilan yang dimaksud justru menghasilkan dokumentasi hukum baru, yang memperkuat alih-alih menghapus jejak digital. Konsep Žižek tentang Real, Simbolik, dan Imajiner menunjukkan bagaimana jejak tersebut tetap ada, menciptakan siklus repetisi dan return of the repressed yang menantang pendekatan hukum konvensional. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa hak untuk dilupakan tidak dapat diwujudkan sepenuhnya melalui mekanisme teknis atau prosedural, melainkan melalui aspek fundamental subjektivitas modern, identitas digital, dan keterbatasan hukum dalam menghadapi realitas digital.