sukarna, kadi
Dosen Magister Hukum Universitas Semarang

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PERAN KOMISI INFORMASI PUBLIK DALAM PROSES EKSEKUSI TERHADAP PUTUSAN SENGKETA INFORMASI YANG BERKEKUATAN HUKUM TETAP DALAM TINJAUAN UU NO.14 TAHUN 2008 TENTANG KETERBUKAAN INFORMASI PUBLIK Slamet Haryanto; Kadi Sukarna
Jurnal Ius Constituendum Vol 2, No 1 (2017): April
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (352.465 KB) | DOI: 10.26623/jic.v2i1.546

Abstract

The community as the users of information has sufficiently important rights in the context of information disclosure. When the right to obtain information isinhibited because the public entity or governor is not available in the execution ofthe information disclosure management, then public information lawsuit willemerge in the implementation of the public information disclosure. The public information lawsuit happens when public entity and the user ofinformation disputes with something related to the rights to acquire informationand to use information based on legislation. The completion of the lawsuitthrough nonlitigation ajudication is the process of the completion of publicinformation lawsuit. The completion of the information through nonlitigationajudication is hopefully able to resolve the dispute fast, low cost, and simple. The problems in this thesis are: a) how the mechanisms of the settlement ofpublic information lawsuit in the Information Commission, b) what obstacles andsolutions of the execution implementation of the Information Commissiondecisions which have been legally binding. Answering the problem, research with juridical normative approach methodwith analytical descriptive research specification was conducted. The type of dataused in this study is secondary data. Based on the research that had been conducted, it was found that PublicInformation Lawsuit Settlement Procedure, the execution of the decision or theexecution of the Information Commission decision which had been legallybinding was conducted by the competent Court, in the context that the publicinformation lawsuit settlement was the court within the jurisdiction of the pleated.In this case if the pleated is State or Government public entity then the court inquestion is the Administrative Court of the State, whereas if the execution pleated is a party outside the State or Government public entity then the competent court is the competent District Court. The execution authority of the Information Commission decision granted tothe State Administrative Court as well as the District Court, causes theinformation users to experience the long process of obtaining information whichis their needs or constitutional rights.
Penal Policy Dilemma: Child Drug Couriers in Indonesia’s Juvenile Justice System Novieyan Yahya; Putri Haliza Yuniar; Kadi Sukarna; Zaenal Arifin
Journal of Law Justice (JLJ) Vol 4 No 1 (2026): Journal of Law Justice
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/jlj.v4i1.5428

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the role and patterns of adolescent involvement as drug couriers in Sumbawa Barat Regency, identify the factors influencing adolescents' vulnerability within drug trafficking networks, and assess the effectiveness of law enforcement and prevention strategies implemented from the perspective of child protection and the juvenile justice system. The method of research used is a qualitative approach with a case study strategy thru in-depth interviews with law enforcement officers, field observations, and the study of official documents related to narcotics cases involving adolescents. The novelty of this research lies in its specific focus on examining the position of adolescents as drug couriers in the Sumbawa Barat Regency, which has been minimally studied in the literature on juvenile criminal law in Indonesia. The study's results indicate that law enforcement against juvenile drug couriers still faces various obstacles, including legal procedures that are not yet fully child-friendly, weak rehabilitative orientation, and lack of coordination between law enforcement agencies and rehabilitation institutions. This study concludes that there is a need to strengthen the capacity of law enforcement officers, optimize rehabilitation programs, and consistently apply preventive and restorative approaches so that the handling of drug cases involving adolescents is not only repressive but also capable of sustainably reducing the involvement of adolescents in drug trafficking.