Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Disiplin : Majalah Civitas Akademika Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum sumpah Pemuda Disiplin : Majalah Civitas Akademika Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum sumpah Pemuda
Salas, Jevi
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Yuridis Tentang Threshold Pilkada Berdasarkan Putusan MK Nomor 60/PUU-XXII/2024 Salas, Jevi; Elviandri, Elviandri; Prasetyo, Bayu
Disiplin : Majalah Civitas Akademika Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum sumpah Pemuda Vol. 31 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46839/disiplin.v31i1.143

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the juridical aspects of the threshold provisions in the Pilkada by referring to the decision. The research method used is a normative research method with a case approach that focuses on analyzing the Constitutional Court Decision Number 60/PUUXXII/2024. The results of the analysis show that the Constitutional Court's decision provides a new interpretation of the threshold provisions, which has the potential to affect the constitutional rights of political parties and independent candidates in the Pilkada contestation. The implication of this decision is a significant change in the regional head nomination mechanism in Indonesia. The General Elections Commission (KPU) revised KPU Regulation Number 8 of 2024 to KPU Regulation Number 10 of 2024 to adjust the nomination regulations with democratic principles and applicable laws. Thus, this decision ensures the legality of regional head candidacy and increases the value of democracy in the 2024 simultaneous regional elections in Indonesia.
Analisis Yuridis Tentang Threshold Pilkada Berdasarkan Putusan MK Nomor 60/PUU-XXII/2024 Salas, Jevi; Elviandri, Elviandri; Prasetyo, Bayu
Disiplin : Majalah Civitas Akademika Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum sumpah Pemuda Vol. 31 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46839/disiplin.v31i1.1154

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the juridical aspects of the threshold provisions in the Pilkada by referring to the decision. The research method used is a normative research method with a case approach that focuses on analyzing the Constitutional Court Decision Number 60/PUUXXII/2024. The results of the analysis show that the Constitutional Court's decision provides a new interpretation of the threshold provisions, which has the potential to affect the constitutional rights of political parties and independent candidates in the Pilkada contestation. The implication of this decision is a significant change in the regional head nomination mechanism in Indonesia. The General Elections Commission (KPU) revised KPU Regulation Number 8 of 2024 to KPU Regulation Number 10 of 2024 to adjust the nomination regulations with democratic principles and applicable laws. Thus, this decision ensures the legality of regional head candidacy and increases the value of democracy in the 2024 simultaneous regional elections in Indonesia.
Co-Authors Bayu Prasetyo, Bayu Elviandri, Elviandri