Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

The Use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) in Maternal Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic Mawarni, Devina Bunga; Ekawati, Fitriana Murriya; Putri, Likke Prawidya; Bismantara, Haryo
Review of Primary Care Practice and Education (Kajian Praktik dan Pendidikan Layanan Primer) Vol 7, No 2 (2024): July
Publisher : Faculty of Medicine, Public Health, and Nursing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/rpcpe.105109

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has driven rapid changes in healthcare delivery worldwide, including maternal care. In Indonesia, there has been an increase in maternal and infant mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic. Hospitals and health centers are high-risk locations for the transmission of this disease. Controlling potential hazards in healthcare facilities can be achieved by using Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). However, there has been an increased demand for PPE during the pandemic, leading to a shortage of availability. Nevertheless, PPE is a crucial component for protecting both healthcare staff and patients from COVID-19 transmission. Research related to the evaluation of PPE usage among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic, especially in maternal healthcare, is limited. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) by healthcare workers when providing maternal care in healthcare facilities in the city of Banjar, West Java. Methods: This research is a quantitative study in the form of a descriptive cross-sectional study. The minimum sample size consisted of 96 individuals, including general practitioners, midwives, nurses, and obstetricians who are currently actively providing maternal care services in healthcare facilities in the City of Banjar. Data collection was conducted using the snowball sampling method in February – March 2022, with the El-Sokkary questionnaire from 2021 as the modified instrument distributed online. Result: The research results showed that the majority of respondents were female (96,3%), worked as midwives (95,4%), were aged 25-34 years (40,3%), had 6-10 years of work experience (29,3%), and in the past two weeks, the majority worked in primary care settings (40,3%). Exposure to training and guidelines, as well as exposure to COVID-19 patients, were both considered high (grand mean 2,7 and 2,2). Healthcare facility policies indicated that the majority did not impose sanctions (75,2%) if personal protective equipment (PPE) was not used according to guidelines, and the compliance rate ranged from 65-80% (43,1%). The frequency of PPE usage was categorized as high (grand mean 3,6), with only 58,7% feeling that the availability of PPE was sufficient, with N95 masks and similar items experiencing the most shortages (73,3%). Healthcare workers' negligence was relatively low (grand mean 2,9), but the compliance with PPE usage guidelines varied from 0 to 42,8%, depending on the type of service provided.  Conclusion: The types of personal protective equipment (PPE) frequently used by healthcare professionals (midwives, nurses, general practitioners, and obstetricians) include surgical masks/N95 masks, waterproof surgical gowns, face shields, goggles, headgear, protective shoes, aprons, and gloves. The overall compliance rate for the use of PPE is approximately 65-80% according to local healthcare facility regulations. The evaluation of PPE usage indicates that the compliance with PPE usage among maternal healthcare providers varies depending on the type of service provided, with the highest compliance observed in the case of delivery services for suspected/confirmed COVID-19 patients. The results of this research are expected to be considered by healthcare facilities and relevant stakeholders in documenting and providing the necessary types of PPE required by healthcare professionals in their daily practice.
Kesiapan Penerapan Pelayanan Kelas Standar Rawat Inap dan Persepsi Pemangku Kepentingan Kurniawati, Golda; Jaya, Citra; Andikashwari, Sekarnira; Hendrartini, Yulita; Dwi Ardyanto, Tonang; Iskandar, Kasir; Muttaqien, Muttaqien; Hidayat, Syamsu; Tsalatshita, Risky; Bismantara, Haryo
Jurnal Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021): Jurnal Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional
Publisher : BPJS Kesehatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (236.833 KB) | DOI: 10.53756/jjkn.v1i1.15

Abstract

Salah satu amanah dari Undang-Undang No. 40 Tahun 2004 tentang Sistem Jaminan Sosial Nasional (SJSN) adalah adanya pelayanan medis dan non-medis yang sama, tidak ada perbedaan, dalam rangka mencapai keadilan sosial. Dalam Program Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional (JKN), keadilan ini diterjemahkan sebagai pelayanan kelas standar rawat inap untuk menggantikan tingkatan fasilitas akomodasi rawat inap yang saat ini berlaku. Memasuki tahun keempat implementasi Program JKN, amanah ini masih belum dapat terwujud. Untuk itu, studi ini berupaya menganalisis kemungkinan penerapan kelas standar rawat inap, termasuk menghitung ketersediaan tempat tidur di Indonesia untuk mendukung penerapan tersebut. Studi ini menggunakan mixed method di mana studi kuantitatif dilakukan melalui metode survei terhadap 520 responden peserta JKN yang pernah mendapatkan pelayanan rawat inap di rumah sakit. Studi kualitatif dilakukan melalui wawancara dan diskusi terarah pada pembuat kebijakan Program JKN. Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa seluruh responden studi dari peserta maupun pembuat kebijakan mendukung penerapan kelas standar rawat inap dengan preferensi yang beragam. Meskipun demikian, disepakati bahwa diperlukan waktu setidaknya 5 tahun untuk memastikan penerapan kelas standar rawat inap dapat dilaksanakan dengan baik. Rumah sakit khususnya membutuhkan waktu untuk mempersiapkan sarana dan prasarana agar sesuai dengan ketentuan kelas standar rawat inap. Studi ini merekomendasikan kepada seluruh pemangku kepentingan untuk mendukung kebijakan kelas standar rawat inap. Tenggat waktu penerapan kelas standar rawat inap pada dokumen Peta Jalan Jaminan Kesehatan perlu direvisi, dilengkapi dengan beberapa regulasi tambahan dan sosialisasi yang intensif.
ANALISIS FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI PELAPORAN INSIDEN KESELAMATAN PASIEN DI RS MATA JEC-CANDI, SEMARANG Uswatunnisa Arfiningtyas; Djasri, Hanevi; Bismantara, Haryo
Journal of Health Service Management Vol 28 No 03 (2025)
Publisher : Departemen of Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health, and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta Jl. Farmako Sekip Utara Yogyakarta 55281 Telp 0274-547490

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jmpk.v28i03.17262

Abstract

Background: The Patient Safety Incident (PSI) reporting system is a recommended method for enhancing patient safety, and it has been implemented by hospitals. However, the reporting rate of PSI remains low. Objectives: This study aims to analyze the impact of individual, team, and organizational factors on PSI reporting at JEC-Candi, Semarang eye hospital and to develop recommendations to improve PSI reporting. Methods: A mixed-methods sequential explanatory design was used. Quantitative data were obtained through a cross-sectional questionnaire survey and analytical observations using secondary data. Qualitative data were gathered from focus group discussion (FGD) with four separate groups: daily practitioner doctors, daily practitioner healthcare workers, daily practitioner non-healthcare workers, and managerial staff. Quantitative data were analyzed using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests and multivariate logistic regression, while qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: The study involved 85 subjects for the quantitative study and 25 subjects for the qualitative study. Individual factors (knowledge and motivation), team factors (teamwork), and organizational factors (feedback) significantly influenced PSI reporting (p<0.005). Motivation emerged as the most dominant factor influencing PSI reporting (p=0.008; OR 47.294; CI 95% 2.678-835.190). The qualitative results provided several recommendations for improving PSI reporting, including regular socialization and training, patient safety awareness campaigns, selecting patient safety champions, establishing reward and incentive systems, organizing team-building and cross-unit collaborative activities, and improving access to PSI reporting feedback information. Conclusions: Individual, team, and organizational factors significantly influence PSI reporting. Therefore, management should implement the recommended strategies to enhance patient safety and quality in the hospital.