Aulia, Dhea Wardah
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Role of Labor Supervision (WASNAKER) In Resolving Legal Violations Regarding Wage Payment below the Minimum Wage Gumilang, Iwan G.; Solichin, Solichin; Marlina, Tina; Ika Putri, Dessy; Aulia, Dhea Wardah
Jurnal Legisci Vol 2 No 5 (2025): Vol 2 No 5 April 2025
Publisher : Ann Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62885/legisci.v2i5.653

Abstract

Background, The annual rise in the nominal District/City Minimum Wage (UMK) is not accompanied by the adherence of Companies/Employers to fulfill their commitment to remunerate workers following the regulations. Labor Supervision, as the coordinator of oversight in the labor sector, encompasses coaching, inspection, testing, and investigation of labor offenses, playing a crucial role in addressing legal infractions related to the payment of wages below the District/City Minimum Wage (UMK). Aim, This study investigates the challenges encountered by Labor Supervision (WASNAKER) in addressing legal infractions concerning wage payments that fall below the district/city minimum wage (UMK). Methods, This article employs an empirical legal methodology utilizing a qualitative approach. Results, From this study, we found obstacles faced by the Cirebon Region III Manpower Supervision (WASNAKER) in handling legal violations against wage payments below the District/City Minimum Wage (UMK) by one of the Commanditaire Vennootschap (CV) in Cirebon Regency, including the Manpower Supervision which does not have executive power in carrying out its supervision activities and the absence of experts in the field of manpower who have certification at the Cirebon Region III Manpower Supervision. Conclusions, Efficient labor oversight is essential to guarantee the enforcement of regulations in compliance with the law. This oversight seeks to uphold labor standards via guidance, inspection, testing, and investigation of labor. However, in its implementation, supervision faces various obstacles, such as the lack of executive power in the supervision process and the absence of certified expert witnesses in the field of labor, as seen in Region III Cirebon. Implication, This study’s results highlight the importance of strengthening the oversight mechanism, including the provision of competent human resources, to ensure compliance with labor regulations and the protection of workers' rights.
RE-EXAMINATION OF THE SUSPECT IN THE PROCESS OF SUBMITTING EVIDENCE AT THE CIREBON CITY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE Aulia, Dhea Wardah; Mustofa, Abdul Azis; Mubarok, Uba Dawan; Waluyadi, Waluyadi
Jurnal Abdisci Vol 3 No 2 (2025): Vol 3 No 2 Tahun 2025
Publisher : Ann Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62885/abdisci.v3i2.728

Abstract

Abstract: Background. A good law enforcement process is the highest hope for the community, especially for justice seekers entangled in legal problems. Problems in the law enforcement process often occur at the pre-prosecution level. Aims. This study aims to analyze the process of re-examination by the Public Prosecutor against the suspect when handing over evidence at the Cirebon City District Attorney's Office. In Indonesian criminal procedure law, this process is regulated by Law No. 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code and Law No.11 of 2021 concerning Amendments to Law No.16 of 2004 concerning the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia. Methods. This research identifies two main problems: (1) the juridical review of the re-examination by the public prosecutor, and (2) whether the process falls under the category of additional examination. The research method used in this research is empirical juridical. The legal research approach is conducted through literature study and interviews. Result. The results of this study indicate that the re-examination conducted by the Public Prosecutor is not part of the additional examination as stipulated in Article 30 paragraph (1) letter e of Law No. 16 of 2004. Implementation. Therefore, the actions of the Public Prosecutor in the process of handing over evidence are categorized as administrative and substantive research in the standard procedure before the case submission to the prosecution stage.