Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Socio Politica : Jurnal Ilmiah Jurusan Sosiologi Integritas Terbuka: Peace and Interfaith Studies Andragogia: Journal of Educational Sciences and Islamic Studies
Malaka, Andi
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Dialogue between the Philosophy of Religion and Science: Dialectics Between Faith and Reason Malaka, Andi; Albustomi, Ahmad Gibson; Waehama, Muhammad Roflee
Socio Politica : Jurnal Ilmiah Jurusan Sosiologi Vol. 15 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Socio-Politica
Publisher : FISIP UIN SGD Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/socio-politica.v15i1.43157

Abstract

This article explores the dialogue between the philosophy of religion and science, focusing on the dialectics of faith and reason while questioning whether the two are inherently opposed or can be harmonized within a broader framework. Through a qualitative approach grounded in literature review, the study identifies historical harmony and contemporary challenges in integrating faith and reason, highlighting how religious philosophy—from Ancient Greece to Islamic thought—demonstrates their potential complementarity in understanding broader truths. In the modern era, this relationship gains heightened relevance in addressing ethical dilemmas posed by technological and scientific advancements, where religion serves as a moral compass to maintain balance. By incorporating the sociological perspective of religion, the article also examines how religion shapes social structures, norms, and policies, ultimately offering strategic insights into fostering interdisciplinary dialogue that unites intellectual, spiritual, and social traditions in contemporary society. Contribution: This article contributes to the philosophy of religion-science discourse by reframing faith and reason as complementary forces rather than antagonistic opposites. It synthesizes historical, ethical, and sociological perspectives to propose interdisciplinary dialogue as a pathway to addressing modern challenges.
Pembebasan Dan Pemberdayaan: Teologi Sosial Hasan Hanafi Dalam Konteks Tafsir Perempuan Berkemajuan Buya Hamka Malaka, Andi; Salam, Mochamad Fadlani
Andragogia: Journal Education Science And Islamic Studies Vol 1 No 2 (2025): Andragogia: Journal of Educational Sciences and Islamic Studies
Publisher : Lembaga Pengkajian Pengembangan Pendidikan dan Kewirausahaan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52496/andragogia.v1i2.686

Abstract

The synergy between Hasan Hanafi's social theology and Buya Hamka's interpretation in the context of women's liberation and empowerment is explored in this paper. Hasan Hanafi, through his liberation theology, emphasizes the importance of real action to achieve social justice and equality. Meanwhile, Buya Hamka, with his humanistic and contextual approach to interpretation, emphasizes the values ??of justice, compassion and humanity in understanding the Qur'an. This research uses a qualitative approach, which is an understanding of the Koranic text as a research object. This research lies in an interdisciplinary approach that combines social theology with women's interpretation and Hasan Hanafi's social theology which can complement each other in efforts to liberate and empower women. This research aims to analyze how these two ideas can work together to create a holistic approach in overcoming social and gender injustice, as well as developing strategies for women's liberation and empowerment. The research results show that there are similar values ??and principles between Hasan Hanafi's social theology and Buya Hamka's interpretation, especially in terms of social justice and gender equality. This synergy produces a comprehensive approach, combining social action with contextual religious understanding. The implementation of this synergy can be applied in various fields such as education, health, public policy and economic empowerment. This article makes a new contribution by proposing a synergy model between social theology and Al-Qur'an interpretation as a strategy for women's empowerment that has not been widely discussed in previous literature. This approach not only provides practical solutions but also forms a framework that enables sustainable social change.
Hermeneutical Reconstruction of Qur’anic War Verses: Exclusive Exegesis, Power Relations, and the Challenge of Religious Radicalism in Contemporary Indonesia Malaka, Andi; Waluyajati, Roro Sri Rejeki; Kustana, Kustana
Integritas Terbuka: Peace and Interfaith Studies Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Integritas Terbuka: Peace and Interfaith Studies
Publisher : Kongregasi Hati Kudus Yesus (RSCJ) Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59029/int.v4i2.67

Abstract

This study aims to analyze how exclusive and literalist interpretations of Qur’anic verses on warfare, such as QS. At-Taubah:5and QS. Al-Anfāl:12, have become one of the roots of religious radicalism and to offer a framework for reconstructing interpretation that is more ethical and contextual. The research employs a qualitative-critical approach through library research, using Fazlur Rahman’s double-movement hermeneutics, Michel Foucault’s analysis of power relations, and the framework of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ahas analytical tools. Data were collected from classical tafsirs (al-Ṭabarī, al-Qurṭubī), modern tafsirs (Tafsir al-Azhar, Tafsir al-Mishbāh), and contemporary academic literature. The findings reveal that literalist exegesis, when detached from its historical context and ethical purposes, legitimizes violence and fuels exclusivism, while contextual exegesis offers an inclusive framework that fosters dialogue, reconciliation, and social justice. This study also shows that exegesis is not ideologically neutral but often functions as an arena of power contestation, where interpretation can either reinforce domination or become a discourse of liberation against fundamentalism. The implications highlight the urgent need to integrate contextual hermeneutics into religious education curricula, strengthen exegetical literacy in public discourse, and promote interreligious dialogue as a means to counter radicalism. The originality of this research lies in its interdisciplinary integration of hermeneutics, power analysis, and socio-political context, which provides a comprehensive framework for reinterpreting Qur’anic war verses in a way that is faithful to the text yet responsive to contemporary plural realities.
Co-Authors Albustomi, Ahmad Gibson Kustana, Kustana Salam, Mochamad Fadlani Waehama, Muhammad Roflee Waluyajati, Roro Sri Rejeki