Dewi, Indriana Puspita
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Development and Validation of A Self-Confidence Measurement Instrument In Mathematics Learning Using The Rasch Model Dewanti, Sintha Sih; Ashabulabib, Adib; Dewi, Indriana Puspita; Islamiyah, Aris Mislikhatun
Mathline : Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): Mathline : Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika
Publisher : Universitas Wiralodra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31943/mathline.v10i1.697

Abstract

Self-confidence is a critical factor in mathematics learning, influencing students' engagement and performance. However, studies show that Indonesian students often lack confidence in mathematics subject, hindering their academic potential. Accurate instruments are needed to measure and address this issue effectively. This tudy aims to develop a self-confidence measurement instrument for mathematics learning among secondary school students. The instrument comprises 25 statements categorized into four main aspects. The research employs a descriptive quantitative method with the Rasch Model approach and utilizes exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. The sample consists of 122 randomly selected tenth-grade students in Yogyakarta. The results indicate that the developed instrument has high validity, with an Aiken's V coefficient of 0.99, and very high reliability, evidenced by a Cronbach's Alpha coefficient of 0.845 with a total of 18 items used. Factor analysis shows that the items in the self-confidence questionnaire meet the unidimensionality requirement, although some items need correction to enhance measurement accuracy for one self-confidence indicator. Overall, this instrument provides a valid and reliable tool for measuring students' self-confidence in mathematics learning, potentially contributing to the enhancement of students' confidence in this subject. So that, 18 statements are more efficient to use, without reducing the scope of the self-confident aspect being measured. The results allow the use of instruments for various levels of education and support the implementation of more personalized learning strategies.
Guided Discovery Learning Integrated with Numbered Heads Together: Effects on Mathematical Problem-Solving and Student Engagement Dewi, Indriana Puspita; Wulandari, Nidya Ferry
Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Vol 26, No 4 (2025): Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA
Publisher : FKIP Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23960/jpmipa.v26i4.pp2382-2402

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effectiveness of the Guided Discovery Learning (GDL) model integrated with the Numbered Heads Together (NHT) cooperative approach in improving students’ mathematical problem-solving ability and student engagement. Effectiveness in this research is operationally defined as a statistically and practically significant improvement in students’ scores and engagement compared to conventional learning. This research employed a quasi-experimental design with a nonequivalent control group. The participants were three intact eighth-grade classes at SMPN 1 Jetis Bantul, selected via cluster random sampling. Class VIII A was taught using GDL combined with NHT, class VIII D used GDL without group work, and class VIII B used conventional learning. Data were collected through a mathematical problem-solving test and a student engagement scale, both validated by experts and tested for reliability. Data analysis used One-Way ANOVA followed by a Tukey HSD post hoc test and Kruskal–Wallis to determine significant mean differences among the three groups, complemented by effect size interpretation to assess the magnitude of differences. The results revealed that the GDL with the NHT model was significantly more effective than conventional learning in improving students’ mathematical problem-solving ability (p < 0.05, Cohen’s d = 0.86). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the GDL+NHT and GDL-only groups, indicating that adding NHT did not confer a significant cognitive benefit beyond the GDL model alone. In contrast, the NHT component meaningfully enhanced students’ engagement, particularly in participatory aspects such as oral, visual, and motor engagement, compared to both the GDL-only and conventional groups. The GDL model, either with or without NHT, effectively enhances students’ mathematical problem-solving ability and student engagement compared to conventional instruction. Future studies are recommended to examine this integration in broader contexts and longer durations to explore its potential for sustainable classroom engagement.    Keywords: effectiveness, problem-solving ability, student engagement, guided discovery learning model with numbered heads together, quasi-experimental design.