Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Role of Roscoe Pound's Social Engineering Theory in Realizing Social Justice Through Legal Discovery in Indonesia Triana, Yeni; Hartono, Wandi; Setiawan, Jetmiko; Muhardi, Dekky
Journal of Social Science and Education Research Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Journal of Social Science and Education Research
Publisher : Raudhah Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59613/rape7j02

Abstract

Roscoe Pound, a well-known legal expert from the United States, said The theory of "social engineering" describes law as a tool to engineer society towards a better order. In this context, the law is not only seen as a set of rules that govern human behavior, but also as a mechanism to create positive social change and realize social justice. The judge in examining and deciding the case, faces a reality, that the written law does not always solve the problem at hand. In fact, often judges often find the law themselves (Rechtsvinding), to complement the existing law in deciding a case. Judges on their own initiative must find the law, because judges should not reject cases on the grounds that the law does not exist, is incomplete, or the law is vague. The method used is normative legal research. Based on the results of the study, it is known that the Role of Roscoe Pound's Social Engineering Theory in Realizing Social Justice Through Legal Discovery in Indonesia that Roscoe Pound's social engineering theory offers a useful framework to understand and improve the role of law in realizing social justice in Indonesia. Through the application of social engineering principles, law can serve as a tool to create positive social change, protect the interests of society, and ensure an equitable distribution of justice. In the Indonesian context, the application of this theory has been seen in various regulations aimed at improving social welfare and overcoming injustice. By continuing to develop and apply social engineering theories in legal discovery, Indonesia can be more effective in facing social challenges and realizing a more just and prosperous society.
TANGGUNG JAWAB HUKUM PELAKU USAHA ATAS PRODUK CACAT TERSEMBUNYI Setiawan, Jetmiko; Yetti; Afrita, Indra
The Juris Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/juris.v9i1.1676

Abstract

Business actors, as parties with stronger bargaining positions, ethically have the obligation to ensure that the products they manufacture and distribute are safe for use. Moral responsibility should drive business actors to actively ensure product quality and refrain from concealing defects or hidden faults that may harm consumers. Therefore, it is important to examine how the Consumer Protection Law regulates the legal responsibilities of business actors for hidden defective products, and how moral responsibility can strengthen their commitment to upholding consumer rights. This study employs normative legal research methods. Based on the findings, the legal responsibility of business actors for hidden defective products, as governed by Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection, serves as a concrete form of consumer rights protection. A hidden defective product is one that appears normal at the time of purchase but contains a defect that is not immediately visible and only causes damage or harm after use. The Consumer Protection Law requires business actors to be fully responsible for the products they produce or trade, including their quality, safety, and the accuracy of the information provided to consumers. Article 19 of Law No. 8 of 1999 stipulates that business actors must provide compensation for damages caused by defective products, including physical harm, contamination, or financial losses. This form of liability is strict, meaning that even if the business actor was unaware of the defect, they are still held accountable for introducing a defective product into the market. This obligation reflects the principle of due diligence in business and reinforces protection for consumers, who are generally in a weaker position in legal and commercial relationships. The legal consequences faced by business actors who neglect or evade this responsibility are also regulated by the Consumer Protection Law.