Akuna, Sandrawati
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Role of the State Administrative Court as a Control Mechanism Over Government Administration Akuna, Sandrawati
Estudiante Law Journal VOL. 7 No. 2 JUNE 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33756/eslaj.v7i2.31024

Abstract

The State Administrative Court (PTUN) plays a central role in upholding the rule of law and good governance by providing oversight of government administration. PTUN serves as a judicial institution authorized to resolve disputes between citizens or private legal entities and state administrative bodies or officials concerning state administrative decisions (KTUN). This study aims to analyze the role of PTUN in protecting citizens' rights and enforcing the principles of good governance. The research employs a normative juridical method with a statutory and conceptual approach. The findings indicate that although PTUN holds absolute competence in resolving administrative disputes, the effectiveness of its rulings still faces challenges, including government non-compliance with court decisions. Additionally, the enactment of Law No. 30 of 2014 on Government Administration has expanded PTUN’s authority, particularly in assessing the presence of abuse of power by state administrative officials. However, the implementation of this regulation still requires strengthening in terms of transparency and accountability. Therefore, enhancing PTUN’s institutional capacity is necessary to ensure legal certainty and justice for the public. In conclusion, PTUN plays a strategic role in maintaining the balance between governmental power and the protection of citizens’ rights, thereby fostering a more transparent, accountable, and just administrative system
Analisis Yuridis Tanggung Jawab Hukum atas Kekerasan yang Dilakukan oleh Oknum Kepolisian Akuna, Sandrawati; Ismail, Dian Ekawaty; Mustika, Waode
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Agustus)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i2.1404

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the legal responsibility for violence committed by police officers, with a focus on cases of wrongful arrest and violence in Gorontalo. This study was motivated by the increasing number of cases of violence by law enforcement officials, which not only violate human rights and the principles of the rule of law but also undermine public trust in the police institution. The method used is normative legal research, with a legislative and conceptual approach. The analysis was conducted on primary legal materials such as laws, government regulations, and implementing regulations, as well as secondary legal materials such as literature, journals, and legal expert opinions. The results of the study indicate that violence by police officers, particularly in cases of wrongful arrest, constitutes a serious violation of the right to freedom and fair treatment before the law. The legal responsibilities that can be imposed include criminal, civil, administrative, and disciplinary liability. Criminal sanctions are imposed if there is evidence of intent or gross negligence, while civil sanctions provide victims with the opportunity to seek compensation. Administrative and disciplinary sanctions, such as reprimands or dismissal, are also important to maintain the integrity of the police institution. Informal resolution through restorative justice mechanisms should not eliminate legal accountability and the victim's right to redress. This study emphasizes the importance of strengthening complaint mechanisms, external oversight, and legal and institutional reforms to ensure the protection of victims' rights and the accountability of police officers in practice.