Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.702
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Maqasid: Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam Legalite: Jurnal Perundang Undangan dan Hukum Pidana Islam SUPREMASI Jurnal Hukum Al-battar: Jurnal Pamungkas Hukum
Rofrofil Akmal, Ahmad Wildan
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Astronomy Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Mediasi Penal sebagai Penyelesaian Pidana Ringan Pondok Pesantren Putra Al-Ishlah Malang; Perspektif Maqashid Syariah Ibnu Ashyur Rofrofil Akmal, Ahmad Wildan; Nur Syifa, Siti; Saifullah, Saifullah
Legalite : Jurnal Perundang Undangan dan Hukum Pidana Islam Vol 10 No 1 (2025): Legalite: Jurnal Perundang Undangan dan Hukum Pidana Islam
Publisher : IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/legalite.v10i1.10999

Abstract

This article aims to examine the implementation of penal mediation as a form of resolving minor criminal offenses committed by students at Al-Ishlah Putra Islamic Boarding School in Singosari, Malang, and to analyze its application from the perspective of maqashid sharia according to Ibnu Ashur. This article falls under qualitative library research with an empirical legal study approach. The findings show that penal mediation in this pesantren represents a legal resolution that emphasizes educational and restorative values, through mechanisms such as deliberation between the offender, the victim, and the student’s guardian, as well as religious and social sanctions aimed at fostering moral awareness. From the perspective of Ibnu Ashur’s maqashid sharia, this practice reflects efforts to protect the five essential aspects of life—religion, life, intellect, lineage, and property—while also demonstrating a legal approach that is rational, proportional, and oriented toward the public good (maslahah ‘ammah).
Rekonstruksi Tindak Pidana Zina Berbasis Maslahah dalam KUHP Indonesia Perspektif Teori Keadilan John Rawls Rofrofil Akmal, Ahmad Wildan; Azizah, Rani Nur
SUPREMASI : Jurnal Hukum Vol 7 No 2 (2025): SUPREMASI : Jurnal Hukum 2025
Publisher : Universitas Sahid

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Permasalahan tindak pidana zina dalam KUHP Indonesia terletak pada pengaturannya yang masih sebatas delik aduan, serta hanya berlaku bagi individu yang terikat perkawinan. Hal ini dinilai tidak sejalan dengan norma agama dan sosial yang berkembang di masyarakat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk merekonstruksi delik zina dalam KUHP dengan pendekatan maslahah dan menilai kesesuaiannya berdasarkan teori keadilan John Rawls. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual melalui kajian pustaka terhadap sumber hukum primer dan sekunder. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengaturan zina dalam KUHP belum mampu menjawab tantangan sosial karena tidak menjangkau praktik zina di luar pernikahan tanpa adanya laporan dari pihak tertentu. Dalam konteks hukum Islam, seluruh bentuk perzinaan dianggap pelanggaran berat yang memerlukan tindakan hukum preventif. Oleh karena itu, rekonstruksi yang ditawarkan adalah mengubah jenis delik menjadi delik biasa serta menyesuaikan sanksi yang lebih efisien secara sosial dan ekonomis. Berdasarkan teori Rawls, hukum pidana harus menjamin kebebasan setara dan perlindungan terhadap kelompok rentan. Kesimpulannya, reformulasi delik zina perlu diarahkan pada keadilan substantif yang responsif terhadap masyarakat pluralistik Indonesia.
Analisis Perlindungan Hak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Anak Dalam UU No. 11 Tahun 2012 Perspektif Teori Keadilan John Rawls Rofrofil Akmal, Ahmad Wildan; Erik Wibowo
al-Battar: Jurnal Pamungkas Hukum Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): April
Publisher : Yayasan Cendekia Gagayunan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63142/al-battar.v2i1.159

Abstract

Criminal acts committed by children are increasingly frequent in Indonesia. The state is responsible for providing special protection for their rights. Law No. 11 of 2012 on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System was introduced as a state response to the need for a child-friendly justice system. This research aims to analyze the legal protection of children who commit criminal acts from the perspective of John Rawls' theory of justice. This study employs a normative legal method using statutory and conceptual approaches. Data sources were obtained through literature studies using primary and secondary legal materials such as legislation, academic literature, and journals. Law No. 11 of 2012 provides legal protection for child offenders through diversion mechanisms and the application of restorative justice. These measures are taken to avoid the imprisonment of children, protect their fundamental rights, and ensure a humane and educational judicial process. The government also emphasizes the involvement of the community and families in the child’s recovery process. The protection of children under Law No. 11 of 2012 aligns with the two main principles of John Rawls' theory of justice: the principle of equal liberty and the difference principle. Children, as a vulnerable group, are positioned as individuals whose rights must be guaranteed equally with other children and who must receive special treatment to ensure substantive justice. This law reflects a legal partiality toward children as the most disadvantaged group within the criminal justice system.
Disfungsi PP Nomor 45 Tahun 1990 Tentang Pembagian Gaji Pasca Perceraian PNS: (Studi Kasus di Pengadilan Agama Bojonegoro) Rofrofil Akmal, Ahmad Wildan; Hakim, Aunul; Toriquddin, Moh
Maqasid: Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam Vol. 14 No. 1 (2025): Maqasid Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30651/mqs.v14i1.25960

Abstract

Divorce among civil servants (PNS) has been increasingly prevalent in Bojonegoro Regency over the past four years. The majority of these cases are dominated by domestic violence (KDRT) and infidelity. There are specific regulations in Government Regulation No. 45 of 1990 concerning civil servants' benefits, which indicate that the status of civil servants is different from that of the general public. This study focuses on the dysfunction of Article 8, which governs the division of one-third of a civil servant’s salary after divorce. This research uses empirical legal research or field research with a qualitative approach. Primary data was obtained from semi-structured interviews with religious court judges in Bojonegoro. The findings of this study reveal that Article 8, which regulates the division of civil servant salaries, is not fully implemented in the Bojonegoro state court or experiences dysfunction. This is due to the potential harm that may arise after the divorce if it is applied in civil servant divorce cases, such as the continued use of alimony by the ex-wife from her former husband until she remarries. This also opens the possibility that if the ex-wife enters into a religious marriage, alimony from the ex-husband will continue to be paid to the ex-wife and her new husband.
Co-Authors Azizah, Rani Nur Erik Wibowo Hakim, Aunul Mohammad Toriquddin Nur Syifa, Siti Saifullah Saifullah