Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Masalah-Masalah Hukum JURNAL PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM INDONESIA
Hardiyan, Salwa Putri
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
EVALUATING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF INDONESIA’S ELECTRIC VEHICLE POLICY: ALIGNING WITH SUSTAINABILITY AND CONSERVATION PRINCIPLES Hardiyan, Salwa Putri; Wibawa, Kadek Cahya Susila; Azhar, Muhamad; Gabriel, Jaewook Lee
Masalah-Masalah Hukum Vol 54, No 1 (2025): MASALAH-MASALAH HUKUM
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/mmh.54.1.2025.57-68

Abstract

This study analyzes the environmental implications of Indonesia’s Battery Electric Vehicle (BEV) policy, as outlined in Presidential Regulation No. 55 of 2019. The policy aims to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and promote a transition to renewable energy within the transportation sector. While the BEV program has contributed to a reduction in GHG emissions, the research identifies several environmental concerns associated with the policy. These include the environmental damage caused by nickel mining, the reliance on coal-fired power plants for electricity generation, and the inadequate handling of battery waste. The study evaluates these issues through the lens of Indonesia's Environmental Protection and Management Law, emphasizing the principles of sustainability and conservation. The findings suggest that the current implementation of the BEV policy does not fully adhere to these principles, as it neglects the broader environmental impacts of nickel extraction, fossil energy dependence, and improper battery waste management. To enhance the policy's effectiveness and ensure alignment with sustainable practices, the research recommends revisions in key areas such as raw material sourcing, energy generation for electric vehicle charging, and waste management protocols. The study highlights the need for a comprehensive and environmentally conscious approach to achieve the long-term goals of reduced emissions and a cleaner transportation system.
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PLATFORM LIABILITY FOR ILLEGAL PREMIUM ACCOUNT SALES: A STUDY OF SAFE HARBOR PRINCIPLES IN INDONESIA AND THE UNITED STATES Ardini, Ni Putu Ayu Meylan; Dharmawan, Ni Ketut Supasti; Hardiyan, Salwa Putri
Masalah-Masalah Hukum Vol 54, No 3 (2025): MASALAH-MASALAH HUKUM (in press)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/mmh.54.3.2025.372-388

Abstract

The rapid development of Indonesia’s digital economy has created new opportunities but also significant challenges, particularly regarding the illegal sale of shared premium accounts on e-commerce platforms. This study examines the legal frameworks governing platform liability for these illegal activities, comparing Indonesia’s regulations with the United States' Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). Using a doctrinal legal research method, the research focuses on key Indonesian laws such as the Copyright Law (Law No. 28 of 2014) and the Information and Electronic Transactions Law (ITE Law), alongside Section 512 of the DMCA. The study finds that Indonesia's legal framework provides only implicit protections, relying on general principles like good faith and fault-based liability, which leads to legal uncertainty. In contrast, the United States’ DMCA offers clearer protections through its Safe Harbor provisions, including a specific notice-and-takedown procedure. This comparative analysis highlights the vulnerability of Indonesian platforms to lawsuits and the broader economic consequences, such as lost revenue, hindered innovation, and potential reputational damage. Furthermore, it emphasizes the need for clearer, consolidated regulations in Indonesia to effectively protect copyright holders and digital platforms. The study proposes a Sui Generis Safe Harbor Model that combines the procedural clarity of the DMCA with Indonesia’s civil law tradition, including the establishment of clear Red Flag Knowledge standards, a mandatory notice-and-takedown procedure, and data disclosure requirements. The research underscores the importance of regulatory reform, enhanced law enforcement coordination, and technological investment to address illegal premium account sales and secure a fair digital environment.
Disability Rights Violation: Failure to Provide Reasonable Accommodation and Employment Discrimination Against the Colorblind in Indonesia Ardini, Ni Putu Ayu Meylan; Wacika, Made Wiswani; Sudiarawan, Kadek Agus; Hardiyan, Salwa Putri
Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia Vol 8, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jphi.v8i1.%p

Abstract

The fundamental right to work in Indonesia is paradoxically undermined by pervasive no color blindness recruitments, often enforced via the Ishihara test. While this practice appears neutral, it constitutes indirect discrimination by disproportionately excluding competent individuals with partial colour blindness without any objective justification. This study aims to analyse the validity of the Ishihara test, arguing that it is a discriminatory tool that violates human rights. Using normative legal analysis and empirical case studies, the findings show that partial colour blindness is primarily a sensory limitation which rarely affects functional capabilities in most professions. Field data reveals a widespread misconception among employers that equates partial colour blindness with an inability to recognise hazards. Furthermore, many institutions enforce colour vision standards as an administrative hurdle without conducting job analyses relevant to the actual requirements of the role. The research concludes that the Ishihara test is widely misused as a definitive pass/fail determinant. This practice contravenes Law No. 13/2003 on Manpower regarding equal opportunity, and Law No. 8/2016 on Persons with Disabilities, which mandates the fulfilment of employment rights and reasonable adjustments. Automatic rejection without interactive dialogue constitutes a direct breach of legal obligations. This research advocates for an inclusive, fair, and dignified employment ecosystem in Indonesia.
Co-Authors Ardini, Ni Putu Ayu Meylan Gabriel, Jaewook Lee Kadek Agus Sudiarawan Kadek Cahya Susila Wibawa Muhamad Azhar, Muhamad Ni Ketut Supasti Dharmawan Wacika, Made Wiswani