Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Maksigama : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Universitas Wisnuwardhana Malang
Sinaga, Irene Putri Alfani Sofia
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Peran Mediasi dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perjanjian Kontrak Bisnis di Indonesia Simarmata, Boy Gabriel Yohanes; Sinaga, Irene Putri Alfani Sofia
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 9, No 3 (2025): Legal Standing
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v9i3.11493

Abstract

Business contract disputes are common issues in the business world, arising from either breaches of agreements or differing interpretations of contract terms. Dispute resolution through litigation often takes a long time, incurs high costs, and has the potential to damage established business relationships. This study aims to analyze the role of mediation in resolving business contract disputes in Indonesia by highlighting its effectiveness, challenges, and opportunities for optimization within legal and practical contexts. This research employs a normative legal method with an analytical approach to relevant regulations, such as Supreme Court Regulation (Perma) No. 1 of 2016 on Mediation Procedures in Court, as well as legal doctrines and related literature. The findings indicate that mediation has great potential as a more efficient dispute resolution mechanism than litigation, as it is flexible, faster, and helps maintain business relationships between parties. However, its implementation still faces obstacles, including low awareness among business actors, a limited number of professional mediators, and a dominant litigation culture. The originality of this study lies in its comprehensive analysis of mediation implementation based on regulatory reviews and business practices in Indonesia, along with strategic recommendations to enhance its effectiveness. The study's limitations include constraints in empirical data collection, as it primarily adopts a normative approach. Therefore, further research based on case studies or interviews with legal practitioners and professional mediators is recommended to gain deeper insights into the practical effectiveness of mediation. To address existing challenges, efforts are needed to promote mediation awareness, improve mediator competencies, and strengthen regulations supporting out-of-court mediation.
Peran Mediasi dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perjanjian Kontrak Bisnis di Indonesia Simarmata, Boy Gabriel Yohanes; Sinaga, Irene Putri Alfani Sofia
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 9 No. 3 (2025): Legal Standing
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v9i3.11493

Abstract

Business contract disputes are common issues in the business world, arising from either breaches of agreements or differing interpretations of contract terms. Dispute resolution through litigation often takes a long time, incurs high costs, and has the potential to damage established business relationships. This study aims to analyze the role of mediation in resolving business contract disputes in Indonesia by highlighting its effectiveness, challenges, and opportunities for optimization within legal and practical contexts. This research employs a normative legal method with an analytical approach to relevant regulations, such as Supreme Court Regulation (Perma) No. 1 of 2016 on Mediation Procedures in Court, as well as legal doctrines and related literature. The findings indicate that mediation has great potential as a more efficient dispute resolution mechanism than litigation, as it is flexible, faster, and helps maintain business relationships between parties. However, its implementation still faces obstacles, including low awareness among business actors, a limited number of professional mediators, and a dominant litigation culture. The originality of this study lies in its comprehensive analysis of mediation implementation based on regulatory reviews and business practices in Indonesia, along with strategic recommendations to enhance its effectiveness. The study's limitations include constraints in empirical data collection, as it primarily adopts a normative approach. Therefore, further research based on case studies or interviews with legal practitioners and professional mediators is recommended to gain deeper insights into the practical effectiveness of mediation. To address existing challenges, efforts are needed to promote mediation awareness, improve mediator competencies, and strengthen regulations supporting out-of-court mediation.
PERBANDINGAN PENGATURAN PMH DI INDONESIA DAN AMERIKA SERIKAT DALAM MENANGANI KASUS KECELAKAAN KERJA Sinaga, Irene Putri Alfani Sofia; Sii, Jung Nelson; Sabela, Louise Shania
MAKSIGAMA Vol 19 No 1 (2025): Maksigama : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Wisnuwardhana Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37303/maksigama.v19i1.202

Abstract

Kecelakaan kerja merupakan isu krusial dalam perlindungan ketenagakerjaan yang dapat menimbulkan kerugian fisik, psikologis, dan ekonomi bagi pekerja. Di Indonesia, peristiwa kecelakaan kerja akibat kelalaian pemberi kerja dapat dikualifikasikan sebagai Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (PMH) berdasarkan Pasal 1365 KUH Perdata. Namun, implementasi gugatan PMH dalam konteks kecelakaan kerja masih menghadapi tantangan serius, mulai dari ketidakpastian hukum hingga lemahnya penegakan keselamatan kerja. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membandingkan pengaturan PMH antara Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat dalam menangani kasus kecelakaan kerja, serta memberikan rekomendasi untuk reformasi hukum di Indonesia. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan komparatif dan historis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Amerika Serikat, dengan sistem common law, menyediakan jalur litigasi perdata melalui tort law dan kompensasi administratif melalui sistem workers’ compensation. Selain itu, mekanisme pertanggungjawaban negara atas kelalaian institusional juga tersedia melalui Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA). Sebaliknya, di Indonesia, mekanisme gugatan PMH belum terintegrasi secara efektif, khususnya dalam perlindungan bagi pekerja informal dan penegakan standar K3. Kesimpulannya, Indonesia perlu mereformasi sistem hukum ketenagakerjaan dengan memperkuat regulasi gugatan PMH, memperluas perlindungan pekerja informal, dan meningkatkan akuntabilitas negara dalam pengawasan keselamatan kerja.
Co-Authors Sabela, Louise Shania Sii, Jung Nelson Simarmata, Boy Gabriel Yohanes