Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Simarmata, Boy Gabriel Yohanes
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Peran Mediasi dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perjanjian Kontrak Bisnis di Indonesia Simarmata, Boy Gabriel Yohanes; Sinaga, Irene Putri Alfani Sofia
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 9, No 3 (2025): Legal Standing
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v9i3.11493

Abstract

Business contract disputes are common issues in the business world, arising from either breaches of agreements or differing interpretations of contract terms. Dispute resolution through litigation often takes a long time, incurs high costs, and has the potential to damage established business relationships. This study aims to analyze the role of mediation in resolving business contract disputes in Indonesia by highlighting its effectiveness, challenges, and opportunities for optimization within legal and practical contexts. This research employs a normative legal method with an analytical approach to relevant regulations, such as Supreme Court Regulation (Perma) No. 1 of 2016 on Mediation Procedures in Court, as well as legal doctrines and related literature. The findings indicate that mediation has great potential as a more efficient dispute resolution mechanism than litigation, as it is flexible, faster, and helps maintain business relationships between parties. However, its implementation still faces obstacles, including low awareness among business actors, a limited number of professional mediators, and a dominant litigation culture. The originality of this study lies in its comprehensive analysis of mediation implementation based on regulatory reviews and business practices in Indonesia, along with strategic recommendations to enhance its effectiveness. The study's limitations include constraints in empirical data collection, as it primarily adopts a normative approach. Therefore, further research based on case studies or interviews with legal practitioners and professional mediators is recommended to gain deeper insights into the practical effectiveness of mediation. To address existing challenges, efforts are needed to promote mediation awareness, improve mediator competencies, and strengthen regulations supporting out-of-court mediation.
Analisis Yuridis Kekuatan Pembuktian dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Praya Alexander, Ariel; Simarmata, Boy Gabriel Yohanes; Siadari, Dyo Ganda; Marpaung, Michelle Evelyn; Tanwijaya, Patrisia
Syntax Literate Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Publisher : Syntax Corporation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36418/syntax-literate.v10i10.61788

Abstract

Pembuktian merupakan aspek paling krusial dalam proses peradilan pidana karena menentukan keyakinan hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan. Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Praya Nomor 126/Pid.B/2022 menjadi salah satu putusan penting yang mengadili perkara penipuan dan tindak pidana pencucian uang (TPPU) dengan kerugian mencapai Rp 11,8 miliar, sehingga menarik untuk dianalisis dari sisi kekuatan pembuktiannya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis secara yuridis bagaimana majelis hakim menilai dan mempertimbangkan alat bukti dalam perkara tersebut serta kesesuaiannya dengan asas-asas hukum acara pidana. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan yuridis-analitis, menggunakan sumber data utama berupa salinan resmi putusan pengadilan dan sumber data sekunder berupa KUHAP, UU TPPU, literatur hukum acara pidana, serta jurnal ilmiah terkait. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa majelis hakim telah menerapkan sistem pembuktian negatif menurut undang-undang (negatief wettelijk stelsel), dengan menggunakan keterangan saksi, alat bukti surat, bukti transfer, dan printout rekening yang saling bersesuaian untuk membentuk keyakinan. Pertimbangan hakim mencerminkan penerapan asas praduga tak bersalah, asas in dubio pro reo, asas legalitas, dan prinsip due process of law, sehingga putusan yang dijatuhkan memiliki dasar hukum yang kuat, memenuhi rasa keadilan, dan memberikan kepastian hukum bagi korban.
Peran Mediasi dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perjanjian Kontrak Bisnis di Indonesia Simarmata, Boy Gabriel Yohanes; Sinaga, Irene Putri Alfani Sofia
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 9 No. 3 (2025): Legal Standing
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v9i3.11493

Abstract

Business contract disputes are common issues in the business world, arising from either breaches of agreements or differing interpretations of contract terms. Dispute resolution through litigation often takes a long time, incurs high costs, and has the potential to damage established business relationships. This study aims to analyze the role of mediation in resolving business contract disputes in Indonesia by highlighting its effectiveness, challenges, and opportunities for optimization within legal and practical contexts. This research employs a normative legal method with an analytical approach to relevant regulations, such as Supreme Court Regulation (Perma) No. 1 of 2016 on Mediation Procedures in Court, as well as legal doctrines and related literature. The findings indicate that mediation has great potential as a more efficient dispute resolution mechanism than litigation, as it is flexible, faster, and helps maintain business relationships between parties. However, its implementation still faces obstacles, including low awareness among business actors, a limited number of professional mediators, and a dominant litigation culture. The originality of this study lies in its comprehensive analysis of mediation implementation based on regulatory reviews and business practices in Indonesia, along with strategic recommendations to enhance its effectiveness. The study's limitations include constraints in empirical data collection, as it primarily adopts a normative approach. Therefore, further research based on case studies or interviews with legal practitioners and professional mediators is recommended to gain deeper insights into the practical effectiveness of mediation. To address existing challenges, efforts are needed to promote mediation awareness, improve mediator competencies, and strengthen regulations supporting out-of-court mediation.
Co-Authors Alexander, Ariel Marpaung, Michelle Evelyn Siadari, Dyo Ganda Sinaga, Irene Putri Alfani Sofia Tanwijaya, Patrisia