Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Keabsahan Penggunaan One Single Submission Risk-Based Approach (OSS RBA) sebagai Sistem Perizinan Berusaha Musthafa, Annas Rasid; Putrazta, Satriya Aldi; Edwinarta, Caesar Dimas; Fitriani, Nur Alifia
Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Vol 20, No 4 (2023): Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia - Desember 2023
Publisher : Direktorat Jenderal Peraturan Perundang-undang, Kementerian Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54629/jli.v20i4.1095

Abstract

Ketidakpastian penggunaan Online Single Submission Risk-Based Approach (OSS RBA) sebagai layanan perizinan berusaha menimbulkan berbagai permasalahan, khususnya permasalahan yang berdampak pada perizinan usaha UMKM. Dampak tersebut diakibatkan dari adanya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 yang menyatakan inkonstitusional bersyarat Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja dan keberadaan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 2 tahun 2022 tentang Cipta Kerja. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui keabsahan penerapan OSS RBA sebagai sistem perizinan usaha serta akibat hukum yang ditimbulkan akibat adanya putusan MK dan Perpu Cipta Kerja terhadap penggunaan sistem OSS RBA. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan dan studi pustaka. Penelitian ini menghasilkan tiga simpulan. Pertama, Penggunaan OSS RBA secara sah telah diatur dalam Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 5 Tahun 2020. Kedua, Akibat hukum dari adanya putusan MK adalah dinyatakannya inkonstitusional bersyarat dasar hukum penggunaan OSS RBA yang berimbas pada digantinya Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 dengan Perppu Nomor 2 Tahun 2022. Ketiga, Akibat hukum dari adanya Perpu Cipta Kerja adalah kembali sahnya penggunaan OSS RBA sebagai layanan perizinan berusaha melalui pemberlakuan peraturan pelaksana dari Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja khususnya dalam Pasal 184 Perppu Nomor 2 Tahun 2022.
Reformulasi Teoretis Konsep Kebatalan Keputusan Administrasi Pemerintahan dalam Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan Efendi, A'an; Sudarsono, Sudarsono; Edwinarta, Caesar Dimas; Musthafa, Annas Rasid
Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Vol 21, No 4 (2024): Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia - Desember 2024
Publisher : Direktorat Jenderal Peraturan Perundang-undang, Kementerian Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54629/jli.v21i4.1266

Abstract

The two types of invalidity of administrative acts in the Government Administration Law, which include invalid and voidable, are not in accordance with the concept of invalidity in administrative law. The aim of this research is to find answers to two problems, first, the concept of administrative acts in the Government Administration Law, and second, the correct meaning regarding the invalidity of decisions based on the concepts and principles of administrative law. Using a doctrinal type of legal research with a legislation approach and a conceptual approach, this research produces two conclusions. First, the concept of decision in the Government Administration Law is a decision in a broad sense including general case decisions (besluit) and individual case decisions (beschikking) including factual actions, and the latter is not appropriate. Second, the nullity of administrative acts in administrative law includes being null and void and voidable, firstly the decision and its legal consequences are deemed to have never existed, secondly the decision and its legal consequences are valid until they are annulled by a later decision or administrative court.
Perlindungan HAM Dari Perbudakan Modern Bagi ABK Indonesia di Kabupaten Tegal (Studi Pada ABK yang Tergabung Di Komunitas INFISA) Aldi Putrazta, Satriya; Edwinarta, Caesar Dimas; Musthafa, Annas Rasid; Fitriani, Nur Alifia; Fakhirani El-difra, Dzakirah Najyala
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.982

Abstract

The protection of human rights for crew of vessels, which is one of the professions in the seafaring and maritime sector, has become an urgency after the increasing cases of modern slavery in Indonesia. Therefore, this research will examine the implementation and optimization of human rights protection for Indonesian crew of vessels, especially those from Tegal Regency. This research uses an empirical legal research method using a descriptive qualitative approach to examine the problems and strategies for optimizing human rights protection for Indonesian crew of vessels. Based on the results of this research, it explains that the practice of modern slavery that often occurs with Indonesian crew of vessels includes exploitation of workers by forcing them to work for 18 hours or more a day, inadequate work wages, a workplace atmosphere that is not conducive, and a lack of supporting facilities for the comfort and welfare of workers. In addition, there are other findings that explain that the protection of the human rights of crew of vessels is regulated in Indonesian legislation and international conventions that have obliged all levels of society to participate in providing human rights protection to Indonesian crew of vessels.