Syahrullah Asyari
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis Kesalahan dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Numerasi Aljabar dengan Menggunakan Prosedur Newman pada Siswa Kelas XI SMA Nur Rahmah Sari; Syahrullah Asyari; Muhammad Darwis M
Issues in Mathematics Education (IMED) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): Volume 7 Nomor 2 Tahun 2023
Publisher : Program of Mathematics Education Department of Mathematics Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences (FMIPA) Universitas Negeri Makassar (UNM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35580/imed.v7i2.7512

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kesalahan siswa dengan menggunakan metodeNewman dalam menyelesaikan permasalahan numerasi Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum materi SistemPersamaan Linear Tiga Variabel. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif deskriptif. Pemilihansubjek yang dilakukan menggunakan teknik purposive sampling sehingga terpilih tiga siswa kelas XI diSMAN 22 Makassar. Instrumen yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini terdiri atas instrumen utama yaknipeneliti sedangkan instrumen pendukung meliputi tes pemahaman pemodelan matematika, tes numerasiAKM, dan wawancara. Data dalam penelitian ini dianalisis melalui tiga tahap yakni kondensasi data,penyajian data, dan penarikan kesimpulan dan verifikasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa siswamelakukan 4 jenis kesalahan berdasarkan prosedur Newman, yaitu kesalahan memahami, kesalahantransformasi, kesalahan keterampilan proses, dan kesalahan pengkodean.Kata Kunci: Kesalahan Siswa, Prosedur Newman, Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum, Sistem Persamaan Linear Tiga Variabel This research aim to analyze students’ errors using the Newman method in solving numerationproblems Minimum Competency Assessment on the topic of Three Variable Linear Equation System. Thistype of research is descriptive qualitative research. The subject selection was carried out using apurposive sampling technique so that three students of grade XI at SMAN 22 Makassar were selected.The instruments used in this research consisted of the main instruments, namely the researcher, while thesupporting instruments included mathematical modeling comprehension tests, AKM numeration tests, andinterviews. The data in this research were analyzed through three stages, namely data condensation, datapresentation, and conclusion and verification. The results showed that students made 4 types of errorsbased on Newman's procedure, namely understanding errors, transformation errors, processing skillerrors, and coding errors.
Analisis Penerapan Model Problem Based Learning Guru Matematika pada Kelas IX SMP Nurul Khariyyah; Muhammad Darwis M; Syahrullah Asyari
Issues in Mathematics Education (IMED) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2023): Volume 7 Nomor 1 Tahun 2023
Publisher : Program of Mathematics Education Department of Mathematics Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences (FMIPA) Universitas Negeri Makassar (UNM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35580/imed.v7i1.7560

Abstract

This is a qualitativedescriptive research that aims to analyze the application of the Problem Based Learning (PBL) model of the mathematics teacher on the surface area of the cylinder. The subject of this study was just one person who was selected purposively from three mathematics teachers of grade IX at SMP. The research instruments were the researcher herself, observation sheet, interview guide, and documentation. The data in this study were then analyzed in three stages, namely data condensation, data presentation, as well as conclusion and verification. The results of the research show that the teacher as a research subject who applies the PBL model in class is not fully in accordance with the theory. In addition, she treats the two research classes differently because of the differences in students' mathematical abilities in the two classes (epistemic injustice). Also, the application of the PBL model does not work as it should be in learning. This is because, on the one hand, there is still a lack of students' ability to understand the context of the problem given by the teacher. On the other hand, the teacher is still accustomed to conventional learning. Therefore, the teacher still tends to dominate learning activities. In fact, learning activities should be dominated by students.