Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Positum RechtIdee
Agi Attaubah Hidayat
UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
A Deep Dive into LAPS SJK Cases: A Qualitative Study on Case Types, Resolution Duration, and Party Compliance Agi Attaubah Hidayat; Amalia Nur Anwari; Lilis Diah Sugiarti; Muhamad Kholid; Naily Aulia Najah
RechtIdee Vol 20, No 2 (2025): DECEMBER
Publisher : Trunojoyo Madura University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/ri.v20i2.32561

Abstract

This study comprehensively analyzes the effectiveness of the Alternative Dispute Resolution Institution for the Financial Services Sector (LAPS SJK) through a juridical-empirical approach that integrates semi-structured interviews, observation, and document analysis of annual reports from 2022–2024. The findings reveal that the composition of disputes is consistently dominated by the banking sector and fintech lending, with mediation serving as the overwhelmingly dominant settlement mechanism. On the other hand, the institution faces significant challenges, including a high case-rejection rate, primarily due to non-compliance with the Internal Dispute Resolution (IDR) process and indications of fraud. In terms of timeliness, LAPS SJK has demonstrated remarkable efficiency by compressing its Service Level Agreement (SLA)driven by digital transformation and process optimization. The most substantive achievement is reflected in the increase in voluntary compliance with decisions, indicating strengthened legitimacy and trust in the institution. This research provides an original contribution through empirical evidence of the paradox between procedural justice in mediation and the role of arbitration in ensuring legal certainty, as well as a projective analysis of the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the development of ADR systems in Indonesia.
Teknik Penalaran Hukum: Deduktif, Induktif, dan Abduktif dalam Perspektif Penerapan Hukum Tia Ludiana; Agi Attaubah Hidayat; Diding Jalaludin
Jurnal Hukum Positum Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Hukum Positum
Publisher : Prodi Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35706/positum.v10i2.13270

Abstract

This paper aims to explore techniques in legal reasoning. The method used in this paper is a literature review. Various literature such as books, scientific articles, research results, case studies/notes and the like will be analysed to obtain a complete picture of legal reasoning techniques. Deductive reasoning is used to draw specific conclusions from general rules, inductive reasoning to draw general conclusions from specific facts, and abductive reasoning to construct hypotheses from incomplete facts. Each method has its own advantages and disadvantages, which contribute to the flexibility and adaptability of law in different situations. Deductive reasoning offers legal certainty, inductive reasoning allows for the development of new laws, and abductive reasoning helps to deal with uncertainty in legal investigation and interpretation.
Co-Authors Amalia Nur Anwari Diding Jalaludin Lilis Diah Sugiarti Muhamad Kholid Naily Aulia Najah Tia Ludiana