Fiqi Restu Subekti
UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Religious Discourse & the Reproduction of Injustice Against Marginalized Workers Fiqi Restu Subekti; Noni Kensiwi
Jurnal Ilmu Politik dan Studi Sosial Terapan Vol 5 No 1 (2026): Maret 2026
Publisher : PT Polstac Repositori Riset

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65974/jiposster.v5i1.77

Abstract

This study investigates how religious discourse is employed to reproduce injustices against marginalized workers within contemporary workplace settings. Aimed at identifying discursive forms, analyzing the factors that facilitate the reproduction of injustice, and exploring its consequences, the study adopts a literature-review approach that traces news coverage, public opinion, and social-media discourse as primary data sources. The findings reveal three principal forms through which injustice is reproduced: (1) the ideologization of moral values that reframes structural problems as personal failings; (2) the sacralization of hierarchical structures that grants moral legitimacy to managerial authority; and (3) the instrumentalization of religious symbols and rituals as mechanisms of social control. Factors reinforcing these processes include conservative religious interpretations, entrenched structural power relations, the psychological internalization of religious values, and cultural norms promoting compliance. The implications comprise an erosion of workers’ critical consciousness, the reinforcement of socio-economic inequality, increased psychological and spiritual burdens, and a weakening of labor solidarity. The study concludes that religious discourse can operate as a tool for conserving the status quo rather than as a catalyst for social justice.
The Development of Contemporary Fatwas on Artificial Intelligence: A Comparative Study of Islamic Legal Reasoning Mu'tasim Fikri; Ihsan Ihsan; Fiqi Restu Subekti; Renol Hasan; Fu'ad Sholikhi
Indonesian Journal of Sharia and Islamic Sciences Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): : May: Safīnah: Indonesian Journal of Sharia and Islamic Sciences
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has generated significant debates regarding its role in Islamic legal reasoning and the legitimacy of AI-assisted fatwas. This study aims to comparatively analyze the development of contemporary fatwas on artificial intelligence by examining the legal reasoning, epistemological foundations, and ethical principles adopted by contemporary Islamic scholars. A qualitative non-empirical approach was employed through a systematic literature review of recent academic publications and contemporary studies on AI, Islamic jurisprudence, fatwa authority, and digital governance. The findings identify three dominant jurisprudential models: restrictive, collaborative, and adaptive. Although these models differ in their evaluation of AI participation in legal reasoning, they consistently affirm that AI cannot independently perform ijtihad or replace qualified jurists. The analysis further demonstrates that contemporary debates have shifted from technological capability toward governance, accountability, and human oversight as the primary determinants of legal legitimacy. This study proposes an integrated governance framework that combines uṣūl al-fiqh, maqāṣid al-sharīʿah, and human-centered supervision to support the responsible integration of AI into Islamic legal institutions while preserving the epistemological integrity and normative authority of Islamic jurisprudence.