Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ekasakti Legal Science Journal Journal of Community Service (Abdisci)
Rival Pramudya
Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
QUESTIONING THE LEGALIZATION OF THE DISMISSAL OF ADVOCATES BY THE SUPREME COURT Rival Pramudya; Putri Sindi Rinata; Bella Putri Nabillah; Herry Frediono Romdhon
Jurnal Abdisci Vol 3 No 1 (2025): Vol 3 No 1 Tahun 2025
Publisher : Ann Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62885/abdisci.v3i1.724

Abstract

Abstract: Background. As one of the main elements in the legal system, advocates have a crucial role in upholding the rule of law in Indonesia. Their duties are not only limited to legal defense, but also include contributions to creating a fair, transparent, and legally certain judicial system. Aims. This study aims to evaluate in depth the legality of the Supreme Court's actions in removing advocates from their positions. Methods. This study uses a normative juridical approach, using secondary data as the primary source. The data includes an Ambon High Court Number 44/KPT decree. W27-U/HM. 1. 1. 1/II/2025 and Banten High Court Number 52/KPT. W29/HM. 1. 1. 1/II/2025, Law Number 18 of 2003 concerning Advocates, and various relevant academic references. The data collection method is done through literature studies and legal document reviews. The analysis is carried out qualitatively with a normative approach to assess the suitability of the actions of judicial institutions with the applicable legal provisions. Result. The results of the analysis show that there is a disorientation in the application of procedural law, even though facts are found that support the violation of the law and professional ethics. Conclusion. This indicates that the legal process carried out has not fully prioritized the principles of justice and legal certainty as mandated in the judicial system in Indonesia. Implementation. The disparity between violations and sanctions enforcement shows that procedural law has not only been procedurally flawed but has also ignored fundamental values such as justice, legal certainty, and institutional accountability. This condition requires a thorough evaluation of procedural law's implementation to build a legal system that is more integrity and responsive to substantive justice.
Kajian Normatif Asas Rechterlijk pardon Dalam KUHP Nasional Untuk Penguatan Keadilan Substantif Rival Pramudya; Ismayana
Ekasakti Legal Science Journal Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): Juli
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.60034/7r8r2522

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganlisis pengaturan serta penerapan mengenai asas rechterlijk pardon dalam hukum pidana Indonesia sebagai instrumen untuk mewujudkan keadilan substantif. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekaan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa asas rechterlijk pardon memiliki landasan normatif yang kuat melalui Pasal 54 ayat (2) Undang-undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang KUHP dan Pasal 256 ayat (1) Undang-undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2025 tentang KUHAP. Analisis terhadap empat putusan pengadilan menunjukkan adanya pola pertimbangan hakim yang relatif konsisten, meliputi ringannya perbuatan, kondisi pelaku yang rentan, bukan seorang residivis, serta adanya pemulihan hubungan dengan korban. Penerapan terhadap asas ini mencerminkan pergeseran paradigma pemidanaan dari pendekatan retributif menuju pendekatan yang lebih restoratif dan humanis
Co-Authors Bella Putri Nabillah Herry Frediono Romdhon Ismayana Putri Sindi Rinata