Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.961
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Yuris: Journal of Court and Justice Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure
Yusuf Adiwibowo
Universitas Jember
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
Consumer Protection Against Electronic Goods Damage: A Case Study of JNE Expedition Indonesia Nadilla Azzachrani; Fendi Setyawan; Yusuf Adiwibowo
YURIS: Journal of Court and Justice Vol. 5 Issue 2 (2026)
Publisher : jfpublisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56943/jcj.v5i2.999

Abstract

The rapid expansion of e-commerce in Indonesia has increased reliance on logistics service providers, yet the multi-party structure of marketplace transactions creates accountability gaps that leave consumers inadequately protected when goods are damaged in transit. This study examines three interrelated issues: the legal relationships among sellers, logistics providers, and consumers in online transactions; the normative basis for consumer protection where electronic goods are damaged during delivery; and the dispute resolution mechanisms available to affected consumers. Employing a normative juridical research design with statute and conceptual approaches, this study analyses the applicable Indonesian legal framework, including Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection, the Indonesian Civil Code, Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions, Law Number 7 of 2014 concerning Trade, Government Regulation Number 71 of 2019, and Ministerial Regulation Number KM 5 of 2005 concerning the Operation of Courier Services. The findings establish that the legal relationship between sellers and consumers constitutes a sale and purchase agreement, the relationship among sellers, logistics providers, and consumers constitutes a goods delivery relationship, and the relationship among the marketplace, seller, and logistics provider constitutes a tripartite cooperation arrangement. The study further finds that while the statutory framework provides a legally sufficient basis for consumer claims, structural fragmentation of responsibility across parties undermines effective redress in practice. These findings extend prior scholarship by identifying a specific accountability gap at the intersection of platform governance and logistics regulation that warrants targeted legislative reform.
Tinjauan Konstitusional PraRatifikasi Perjanjian Internasional: Studi Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Indonesia dan Hungaria yuvita Mardiana; Nuzula Sari; Yusuf Adiwibowo
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 7 No 1 (2026): Tema Hukum Internasional
Publisher : Himpunan Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v7i1.3839

Abstract

The increasing involvement of states in international treaties creates tensions between international obligations and constitutional supremacy. Indonesia does not yet have a constitutional pre-ratification review mechanism, putting it at risk of both domestic unconstitutionality and international liability. In contrast, Hungary implements preventive review based on the 2011 Hungarian Constitution (Alaptörvény), supported by the 2011 CLI Law on the Constitutional Court, reflecting a fundamentally different constitutional design. Using normative legal research through comparative and conceptual approaches, this study finds that the existing ex post review model in Indonesia creates systemic vulnerabilities not present in Hungary's ex ante system. As a novelty, this study offers a three-tier adaptation model encompassing constitutional amendments, legislative revisions and progressive judicial interpretation to integrate constitutional pre-ratification review into the Indonesian legal system. The proposed model positions Pancasila as the staatsfundamentalnorm in the constitutional review of international treaties, an element not present in the Hungarian constitutional framework.
Pembatasan Penggunaan Surat Kuasa dalam Praktik Kenotariatan: Studi Perbandingan Indonesia dan Swedia diah ayuning; nuzula kumala sari; Yusuf Adiwibowo
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 7 No 1 (2026): Tema Hukum Internasional
Publisher : Himpunan Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v7i1.3965

Abstract

This study analyzes the regulation of powers of attorney in notarial practice through a comparative study of law between Indonesia and Sweden, using normative juridical methods and comparative, statutory and conceptual approaches. The results reveal fundamental differences in the regulation of absolute powers of attorney. Indonesia imposes restrictions on absolute powers of attorney, particularly in the transfer of land rights, to maintain order in land administration and prevent legal smuggling. In contrast, Sweden, through its fullmakt regulation in Avtalslagen, provides greater flexibility by emphasizing third-party protection and transaction certainty. The study also found that Indonesian notaries bear broader responsibility for the formal and material correctness of deeds, while the Swedish Notarius Publicus focuses on identity verification and signature authenticity. These findings suggest the need to strengthen digital verification systems and reformulate notarial accountability regulations to increase legal certainty and prevent fraud.
Kepastian Hukum Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 2/Puu-Xix/2021 dalam Perspektif Globalisasi Ekonomi: Studi Perbandingan dengan Inggris dan Afrika Selatan Bambang Wahyono; nuzula Sari; Yusuf Adiwibowo
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 7 No 1 (2026): Tema Hukum Internasional
Publisher : Himpunan Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v7i1.3981

Abstract

Constitutional Court Decision No.2/PUU-XIX/2021 limits the unilateral enforcement of fiduciary guarantees by requiring a judicial process if the debtor objects to a breach of contract. This study aims to analyze the legal certainty of fiduciary guarantees after the ruling from the perspective of economic globalization through a comparative study with the United Kingdom and South Africa. The research method used is normative law with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The results show that Indonesia has shifted from an execution model to judicial execution. The United Kingdom and South Africa continue to maintain unilateral execution with more measurable debtor protection mechanisms. This study recommends the reconstruction of Article 15 of the Fiduciary Guarantee Law to balance legal certainty, economic efficiency, and debtor protection.
Perdagangan Internasional Jasa Pariwisata di Bali dalam Perspektif Hukum GATS-WTO Analisis Terhadap Praktik Bisnis Asing Tanpa Izin di Bali Hadi Nur Ikhwan; Yusuf Adiwibowo
J-CEKI : Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah Vol. 5 No. 2: Februari 2026
Publisher : CV. ULIL ALBAB CORP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/jceki.v5i2.13557

Abstract

Sektor pariwisata merupakan salah satu komponen penting dalam perdagangan jasa internasional yang diatur oleh General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) di bawah Organisasi Perdagangan Dunia (WTO). Bali sebagai destinasi wisata global menghadapi fenomena meningkatnya keterlibatan pelaku usaha asing dalam penyediaan jasa wisata tanpa izin usaha resmi di Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis praktik bisnis asing tanpa izin di Bali dalam perspektif hukum perdagangan internasional, khususnya kesesuaiannya dengan ketentuan liberalisasi jasa di bawah GATS dan hukum nasional Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis-normatif dengan pendekatan perbandingan antara ketentuan internasional dan hukum domestik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya potensi pelanggaran terhadap prinsip Most Favoured Nation (MFN) dan National Treatment jika regulasi domestik tidak diharmonisasikan secara proporsional. Namun demikian, Indonesia memiliki hak untuk menerapkan pembatasan berdasarkan Article XIV GATS yang memperbolehkan pengecualian demi kepentingan publik dan penegakan hukum.
Konstitusionalitas Tata Kelola Pungutan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) Dalam Keuangan Negara Icha Cahyaning Fitri; Yusuf Adiwibowo; Eka N.A.M. Sihombing
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 26 No 2 (2026): Edisi Juli
Publisher : Law Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law of The Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2026.V26.127-142

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the mechanisms of fees collected by Indonesia’s financial sector regulator in comparison with other countries, as well as the legality of these fees and the reporting of the OJK’s budget utilization. This study is a normative legal study employing a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a comparative approach to the models of financial sector regulatory agencies in Japan and Germany. The results of the study indicate that OJK levies possess the characteristics of public revenue because they derive from state authority, are compulsory in nature, and are used to finance the oversight functions of the financial services sector. However, the regulations governing the use of these levies in Government Regulations have not been fully integrated into the state treasury mechanism, thereby creating a normative inconsistency with the principles of state financial management under Article 23A of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. This study concludes that the constitutionality of OJK levies requires clarification of their status as part of the state treasury. Therefore, a revision of Government Regulation No. 41 of 2024 is necessary, particularly regarding restrictions on the use of surplus levies across fiscal years, the obligation to deposit surplus levies into the state treasury, and the harmonization of the OJK’s financial reporting system with Government Regulation No. 71 of 2010 on Government Accounting Standards through the separation of reporting for state budget funds and levy funds. Furthermore, all uses of levy funds must be comprehensively audited by the State Audit Agency (BPK) and supervised by the House of Representatives (DPR) to ensure transparency, fiscal accountability, and legal certainty in the management of state finances.
Co-Authors Bambang Wahyono diah ayuning Eka N.A.M. Sihombing Fendi Setyawan Hadi Nur Ikhwan Icha Cahyaning Fitri Nadilla Azzachrani nuzula kumala sari Nuzula Sari yuvita Mardiana