Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pendas : Jurnah Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar
Atikah Rahmah Nasution
Unknown Affiliation
Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
UJI HIPOTESIS DUA SAMPEL Atikah Rahmah Nasution; Raphli Ardhana; Almira Amir
Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Vol. 10 No. 04 (2025): Volume 10 No. 04 Desember 2025 Published
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar FKIP Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/jp.v10i04.40028

Abstract

This study was conducted to review various journals discussing the application of two-sample hypothesis testing in the context of quantitative research in statistics courses. The review was conducted using a literature review method, namely taking references or data sources from reading materials such as journals and articles. The results of this study are to observe the application of the two-sample t-test to test the effectiveness after the application of the two-sample hypothesis test with the type of independent sample test and paired sample test. The findings also revealed that the selection of the test type is greatly influenced by the fulfillment of the assumptions of normality and uniformity of variance. Several articles emphasize the importance of sample size, the validity of the measuring instrument, and control for interfering variables to increase the reliability of the results of the hypothesis test. Overall, this review concludes that two-sample hypothesis testing is an efficient and widely used statistical analysis method, but its application must be accompanied by a deep understanding of statistical assumptions for accurate interpretation.
ANALISIS KOMPARATIF TEORI EVALUASI PENDIDIKAN: MODEL TYLER, SCRIVEN, STUFFLEBEAM (CIPP), DAN STAKE Andrini Rosa Putri Siregar; Atikah Rahmah Nasution; Mariam Nasution
Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Vol. 11 No. 02 (2026): Volume 11 No. 02 Juni 2026 Press
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar FKIP Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/jp.v11i02.61281

Abstract

Evaluation is a strategic component in the education system that serves as a basis for decision-making to improve the quality of learning and educational programs. Various evaluation models have been developed to address diverse evaluation needs according to the objectives, context, and characteristics of the program being assessed. This article aims to comprehensively analyze the Tyler, Scriven, Stufflebeam (CIPP), and Stake evaluation models and identify their strengths, limitations, and relevance in modern educational practice. The research uses a literature review method with a descriptive-analytical approach through a review of various relevant scientific sources. The results of the study indicate that the Tyler Model emphasizes the achievement of educational objectives as an indicator of program success. The Scriven Model develops formative and summative evaluations as well as goal-free evaluations that enable a broader identification of program impacts. The CIPP Model offers a comprehensive evaluation approach through the evaluation of context, input, process, and product, thus supporting sustainable decision-making. Meanwhile, the Stake Model emphasizes evaluation that is responsive to the needs of stakeholders and real-world conditions. The findings indicate that no evaluation model is completely superior to the others because each has a different focus, strengths, and limitations. Therefore, the selection of an evaluation model needs to be adjusted to the objectives, characteristics of the program, and the information needs to be obtained.
Co-Authors Almira Amir Andrini Rosa Putri Siregar Mariam Nasution Raphli Ardhana