Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.983
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pengabdian Al-Ikhlas Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis
Lutfi Yusup Rahmathoni
Universitas Islam Kalimantan MAB
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
PENYULUHAN HUKUM DALAM UPAYA PENCEGAHAN BULLYING DI SMA MUHAMMADIYAH KARANG INTAN KABUPATEN BANJAR Akhmad Munawar; Lutfi Yusup Rahmathoni; Muhamad Ali Sariati; Noor Jannah; Rizkiah Inayati; Muhammad Fadhan Adhani
JURNAL PENGABDIAN AL-IKHLAS UNIVERSITAS ISLAM KALIMANTAN MUHAMMAD ARSYAD AL BANJARY Vol 10, No 3 (2024): AL-IKHLAS JURNAL PENGABDIAN
Publisher : Universitas Islam kalimantan MAB

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31602/jpaiuniska.v10i3.16829

Abstract

ABSTRAKBullying di kalangan remaja sekolah merupakan masalah serius yang perlu ditangani dengan perhatian dan pendekatan yang tepat. Dalam rangka pemahaman dari aspek hukum pencegahan Bullying dalam guna memberikan pemahaman dalam Upaya meminimalisir dampak negative bullying serta melindungi generasi muda, Penyuluhan hukum tentang pencegahan Bullying dikalangan remaja sekolah di daerah merupakan salah satu solusi terhadap permasalahan yang dihadapi sekarang ini. Melalui kegiatan ini, diharapkan ke depannya dapat meningkatkan pengetahuan, kemampuan dan penguasaan terhadap penyuluhan Hukum Pencegahan Bullying di SMA Muhammadiyah Karang Intan Kabupaten BanjarKata kunci: Penyuluhan Hukum, Bullying, remaja, sekolah
Analisis Hukum terhadap Perlindungan Whistleblower dalam Mendukung Kebebasan Berpendapat di Indonesia Aina Pramita Sari; Akhmad Munawar; Lutfi Yusup Rahmathoni
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 4 No 7 (2023): Tema Hukum Pidana
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v4i7.791

Abstract

Freedom of opinion and protection of whistleblowers are two critical aspects in maintaining transparency and accountability in Indonesia, particularly within the context of a healthy democracy. Article 28E, Paragraph (3), and Article 28F of the 1945 Constitution guarantee the right of every individual to express opinions, access information, and communicate freely. However, the implementation of freedom of opinion often faces obstacles, especially in relation to the ITE Law, which contains multi-interpretive articles, such as Article 27, Paragraph (3), and Article 28, Paragraph (2). These provisions are frequently used to criminalize individuals who express criticism or file public reports. This creates an imbalance between the right to freedom of expression guaranteed by the constitution and the inconsistent application of the law. This article also underscores the importance of legal protection for whistleblowers, who often face both physical and legal threats. While existing legal protections, such as Law No. 13 of 2006 in conjunction with Law No. 31 of 2014 regarding Witness and Victim Protection, provide a legal foundation, their implementation remains limited in the digital context. Therefore, harmonizing regulations, including revising the ITE Law, is essential to ensure that both freedom of expression and whistleblower protection are properly safeguarded. Reform in Indonesia's legal system is urgently needed to create a safe environment for the public to voice their opinions and report violations. This, in turn, will strengthen transparency, prevent corruption, and bolster democracy in Indonesia.
Paradigma Baru Hukum Acara Pidana: Rekonstruksi Perlindungan Hak Asasi Tersangka dalam Proses Peradilan M. Supian Noor; Akhmad Munawar; Lutfi Yusup Rahmathoni
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 5 No 12 (2024): Tema Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v5i12.821

Abstract

The Indonesian criminal justice system faces significant challenges in balancing legal certainty and the protection of suspects' human rights. Although the presumption of innocence principle is enshrined in various laws and regulations, pretrial detention practices are often misused by law enforcement officials as a psychological pressure tool against suspects. Article 21 of the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) grants broad discretionary powers to investigators and prosecutors in determining detention, without stringent judicial oversight. This situation creates a high risk of arbitrary criminalization, which contradicts the fair trial principle as stipulated in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). This article analyzes the fundamental weaknesses in the criminal procedural law system, particularly in detention mechanisms and pretrial judicial oversight, and proposes a more just and accountable system reconstruction. KUHAP reform is necessary to establish stricter minimum evidence standards before detention, expand pretrial judges' authority to assess the substance of evidence, and strengthen independent oversight of detention decisions made by law enforcement officials. By implementing these reforms, Indonesia's criminal justice system can become more transparent, accountable, and aligned with internationally recognized human rights protection principles.
Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Delik Aduan dalam Penegakan Hukum Hak Cipta berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Lutfi Yusup Rahmathoni; Sri Herlina; Sudiyono Sudiyono; Ahmad Rizqi
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 7 (2025): Tema Hukum Pidana
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i7.1801

Abstract

This study examines the application of complaint offenses in copyright law enforcement under Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright. As part of intellectual property rights, copyright provides legal protection for creative works, enabling creators or rights holders to obtain both economic and moral benefits, and preventing violations such as piracy or unauthorized use. Based on Article 120 of the Copyright Law, most copyright violations are classified as complaint offenses, meaning that investigation and prosecution can only proceed if a complaint is filed by the creator, copyright holder, or an authorized party unless the violation harms the public interest, in which case it is treated as an ordinary crime. This study employs a descriptive-analytical approach to primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The findings indicate that the regulation of complaint offenses offers flexibility for rights holders to choose between litigation and non-litigation resolution. However, implementation faces challenges such as proving ownership, lengthy legal processes, and the potential misuse of complaint withdrawals. In conclusion, applying the complaint offense mechanism to copyright law can balance the protection of individual rights with the public interest, but it requires stronger regulations and greater legal awareness to achieve more effective and equitable enforcement.
Penerapan Asas Pembuktian Terbalik dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana dalam Perkara Pencucian Uang di Indonesia Sri Herlina; Lutfi Yusup Rahmathoni; Sudiyono Sudiyono; Macario G. Gayeta
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 7 (2025): Tema Hukum Pidana
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i7.1805

Abstract

Money laundering is a serious crime that has a major impact on the economic stability and integrity of the country's financial system. This crime is generally associated with predicate offenses, such as corruption, narcotics, and organized crime, to conceal the origin of illicit wealth. In law enforcement, the application of the reverse burden of proof principle is a crucial strategy for overcoming the difficulty of proof. This study examines the application of the reverse burden of proof principle in the Indonesian criminal justice system, particularly in money laundering cases, as outlined in Law Number 8 of 2010. The method used is normative juridical with a conceptual and statutory approach. The results of the study indicate that the application of the reverse burden of proof principle can strengthen efforts to eradicate money laundering, but must still uphold the principle of fair trial and protection of human rights, especially the presumption of innocence. Law Number 8 of 2010 has not comprehensively regulated the standards of proof, verification, and legal impact of this principle, thus creating a vacuum of norms and legal uncertainty. In practice, the accused is only burdened to explain the origin of the wealth, while the prosecutor proves the elements of the crime. However, this shifting burden of proof still raises concerns about violations of the presumption of innocence. Therefore, the application of the reverse burden of proof principle requires more detailed legal regulations and strict supervision so that it is not misused and continues to guarantee legal justice for the accused.
Co-Authors Ahmad Rizqi Aina Pramita Sari Akhmad Munawar M. Supian Noor Macario G. Gayeta Muhamad Ali Sariati Muhammad Fadhan Adhani Noor Jannah Rizkiah Inayati Sri Herlina Sudiyono Sudiyono