p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Disability and Structural Injustice in Miracle in Cell No. 7: A Critical Disability Analysis Doni Efrizah; Dela Pebriani; Clara Puspita; Purwarno Purwarno
JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE Vol 8, No 1: May 2026
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30743/jol.v8i1.13273

Abstract

This study examines how intellectual disability and structural injustice are constructed in Miracle in Cell No. 7, directed by Hanung Bramantyo. It aims to analyze the discursive construction of disability and the reproduction of structural discrimination within legal and social contexts. Using a qualitative research design with a critical discourse analysis approach, this study applies Critical Disability Theory to interpret selected dialogues and key scenes that reflect power relations and institutional practices within the narrative. The findings reveal that intellectual disability is constructed as deviance within legal discourse, leading to discursive marginalization and the denial of agency. Discrimination operates structurally through institutional mechanisms such as coercive interrogation, lack of accommodation, and biased legal procedures within the criminal justice system. At the social level, stigma and dominant cultural narratives construct disability as a marker of danger and incompetence, reinforcing exclusion and legitimizing injustice. The novelty of this study lies in highlighting how cinematic narratives reproduce institutionalized ableism across both legal and social domains. It contributes to Critical Disability Studies by emphasizing discrimination as a multidimensional and structurally embedded phenomenon shaped by power relations. Practically, the study underscores the need for disability-inclusive legal frameworks and increased social awareness to promote justice, equality, and dignity for persons with disabilities.
Beyond Similarity and Difference: A Contrastive Syntactic Study of Noun Phrase Formation and Function in English and Acehnese Clara Puspita; Risa Umami; Triana Lestari; Sempa br Perangin Angin; M Safii; Edward Dolmer Panggabean
JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE Vol 8, No 2: November 2026 (In Progress)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara (UISU)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30743/jol.v8i2.14435

Abstract

This study examines noun phrase formation and grammatical function in English and Acehnese through a contrastive syntactic analysis. It investigates how the two languages express comparable nominal meanings and grammatical relations while organizing noun phrase constituents differently. The study adopts a qualitative, document-based approach using published grammatical descriptions and previous studies of English and Acehnese, with particular reference to Durie (1985) and Rizqi (2017). The analysis focuses on noun phrase heads, nominal modification, demonstratives, possession, quantity and classifiers, and post-head expansion. The findings indicate that English and Acehnese share broad functional similarities in noun phrase use, but differ in the ordering and grammatical realization of their constituents. English commonly places determiners, possessive forms, and adjectives before the head noun, whereas documented Acehnese constructions exhibit patterns in which certain modifiers follow the head and quantity expressions involve classifiers. These patterns demonstrate that functional similarity does not necessarily entail structural equivalence. The study proposes three analytical categories for interpreting the comparison: functional convergence, structural correspondence, and grammatical divergence. It contributes to contrastive syntax by emphasizing the need to describe each language according to its own grammatical organization rather than treating English constituent order as a universal model. Because the analysis relies on published descriptions and selected examples rather than a systematically compiled parallel corpus, the findings are descriptive and should not be interpreted as evidence of construction frequency or of patterns shared by all Acehnese varieties. Further research using systematically collected and contextualized data is needed to examine the distribution of these constructions and their implications for language teaching.