Harahap, Rizki Nanda Fauzi
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI REMAJA PEREMPUAN DARI KEKERASAN SEKSUAL VIA MEDIA SOSIAL Syaharani, Nabilah; Rahmayanti, Rahmayanti; Nurdiana, Citra; Saputra, Defri Dwi; Harahap, Rizki Nanda Fauzi
Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance
Publisher : Gapenas Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53363/bureau.v5i2.596

Abstract

Technological advancements have significantly transformed modes of communication in society, particularly among adolescents. Social media has become the primary space for interaction; however, it also presents negative impacts, one of which is online-based sexual violence. Adolescent girls are the most vulnerable group to such violence due to their psychological and social conditions, which are still in developmental stages. This study aims to analyze the forms of sexual violence perpetrated through social media and to assess the effectiveness of existing legal protections available for adolescent girls as victims. The research employs a normative juridical method with statute and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that digital sexual violence—including the non-consensual dissemination of intimate content, cyberstalking, and sexually charged comments—constitutes criminal acts punishable under the Sexual Violence Crimes Law (UU TPKS), the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE), and the Indonesian Penal Code (KUHP). However, weak law enforcement and prevailing victim-blaming culture exacerbate the victims' conditions. Prevention must be pursued collaboratively through digital literacy education, community empowerment, the establishment of safe reporting mechanisms, and firm legal enforcement. Social media must be managed as a safe and equitable space, rather than a platform for exploitation.
LEGAL MEMORANDUM TENTANG WANPRESTASI: ANALISIS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN TINGGI SEMARANG Nomor 460/PDT/2020/ PT SMG Syaharani, Nabilah; Fitrianto, Bambang; Nurdiana, Citra; Saputra, Defri Dwi; Harahap, Rizki Nanda Fauzi
Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance
Publisher : Gapenas Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53363/bureau.v5i2.599

Abstract

This study examines a breach of contract case in a lease agreement, as reflected in the Decision of the Semarang High Court Number 460/PDT/2020/PT SMG. The dispute originated from the Plaintiff's claim that the Defendant had failed to pay the remaining lease amount of Rp 40.000.000. However, the Defendant successfully demonstrated that an overpayment of Rp 20.000.000 had occurred beyond the agreed contractual obligation. Additionally, the Defendant raised an exception regarding the absence of necessary parties (Plurium Litis Consortium), arguing that the Plaintiff had acted individually without including other heirs of the leased property, which was part of an inherited estate. This research adopts a normative juridical method with statutory and case approaches. Data were drawn from primary and secondary legal materials and analyzed qualitatively using a descriptive approach. The analysis reveals that the panel of judges upheld the Defendant’s exception and declared the Plaintiff’s claim inadmissible (Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard), without proceeding to the merits of the case, on the grounds of a formal defect. Furthermore, the claim was considered obscuur libel (vague), as it failed to specify the legal basis for the alleged breach of contract. This study underscores the importance of fulfilling formal requirements in civil litigation, including clarity in the content of the claim and completeness of the involved parties, to preserve the right to substantive examination. The decision provides a valuable legal lesson on the critical role of documentation, evidence, and the structural formulation of a lawsuit in upholding justice in civil cases.