Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

ANALISIS KOMPETENSI ABSOLUT BAGI PERMASALAHAN UMAT ISLAM DI PENGADILAN AGAMA Lubis, Fauziah; Rangkuti, Shindy Tamanda; Harahap, Muthia Sartika; Aziz, Muhammad; Hasibuan, Nurul Hakiki; Hidayah, Khairul
Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance
Publisher : Gapenas Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53363/bureau.v5i2.614

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze in depth the legal basis and limits of the absolute authority of the Religious Court in resolving various legal issues of Muslims in Indonesia, and to identify the legal implications of the misapplication of this authority. The issues raised focus on the importance of properly understanding absolute and relative competence in civil procedural law, especially to avoid errors in determining the competent court forum. Through a normative legal approach and literature study, this study explores the scope of the absolute authority of the Religious Court over cases such as marriage, inheritance, wills, grants, waqf, zakat, infaq, shadaqah, and sharia economics as regulated in Law Number 3 of 2006 and other related laws and regulations. The results of the analysis show that absolute competence plays an important role in maintaining judicial order, preventing overlapping jurisdictions, and ensuring legal certainty and justice for the Muslim community in Indonesia.
Perbandingan Pengaturan Tata Hukum Antara Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat Siregar, Barly Harly; Fadhil, Rahmad; Kutub, Sayyid; Sarah, Aulia; Hasibuan, Mutiah Aminarti; Syahputri, Tri; Dewi, Delima Puspita; Harahap, Muthia Sartika; Rahma, Hidayatul; Siregar, Risnawati; Andini, Tatya Zahra; Siregar, Haiqal Rahman
As-Syirkah: Islamic Economic & Financial Journal Vol. 3 No. 3 (2024): As-Syirkah: Islamic Economic & Financial JournalĀ 
Publisher : Ikatan Da'i Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56672/36n0xk47

Abstract

Perhaps the most important development in patients' rights has been that in Indonesia and the United States regarding the doctrine of informed consent. Embracing the Continental European legal system, the doctrine of informed consent in Indonesia is articulated in Law No. 36 of 2009 on Health, Government Regulation No.32 of 1996 on Health Worker, Law No.29 of 2004 on Medical Practice, and Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection. It is also specifically regulated by Health Ministerial Decree No. 29 of 2008 regarding Medical Action Approval. This doctrine requires physicians to share certain information with patients before asking for their consent to treatment. The Court in the United States of America used the term of informed consent to describe the physicians obligations to provide information. The legal consequences if informed consent is not given, it is considered as an act of abuse (intentionally) to the patient. According to Rule of law in the United States that physicians have to open all the information about all the necessary facts, so that patients can determine appropriate treatment options. Tort Law in Anglo-Saxon legal system, similar to "act against the law" in the Continental European legal system. This article examines a comparative study of informed consent in the Indonesian Health Laws and regulations and those of the United States.