Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Konsensus: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi Jurnal CENDIKIA ISNU Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU
Fitria Mukhtar Siregar
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Kontrak Kerja vs Kontrak Platform : Perbandingan Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pekerja di Era Ekonomi Digital Rahma Fitri Amelia Hasibuan; Muhammad Abdillah; Nadilah Andini; Fitria Mukhtar Siregar; Annisa Putri Andini Tanjung
Konsensus : Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Juni : KONSENSUS : Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti Dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/konsensus.v2i3.941

Abstract

The rapid development of the digital economy has transformed the labor landscape with the emergence of a new type of employment contract known as platform contracts, which differ from conventional formal employment contracts. This phenomenon poses significant challenges regarding legal protection for workers, especially in ensuring basic rights and social justice in the digital era. This study aims to analyze the comparison of legal protection between workers bound by formal employment contracts and digital platform workers. The research method used is qualitative descriptive with a literature review from various relevant primary and secondary sources. The results reveal that formal workers receive stronger and more comprehensive legal protection through existing labor regulations, whereas platform workers face legal status ambiguity, leading to minimal protection and risks of exploitation. This study emphasizes the importance of adaptive legal reforms to accommodate changes brought by the digital economy by expanding the definition of workers and providing equal legal protection for platform workers. In conclusion, regulatory updates and collaboration among various stakeholders are necessary to create a fair and sustainable work ecosystem in the digital era.
Confidentiality In The Arbitration Process And Its Implications For Legal Transparency Fitria Mukhtar Siregar; M. Abdillah; Suci Hidayati Malau; Raja Muda Pahlevi Siregar
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Januari
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1308

Abstract

This paper examines the application of the confidentiality principle in arbitration and its implications for legal transparency. Arbitration, as an alternative dispute resolution mechanism, emphasizes efficiency, procedural flexibility, and the protection of parties’ interests, with confidentiality serving to safeguard sensitive information, trade secrets, and corporate strategies. Using a qualitative descriptive-analytical approach, data were collected through literature studies, including legislation, arbitration rules, awards, and academic sources. The research was conducted systematically in several stages: identification of issues, collection of secondary data, qualitative analysis through thematic coding, and formulation of conclusions and recommendations. The findings indicate that while confidentiality ensures secure dispute resolution and protects business interests, it can hinder transparency, limit public access to legal information, and create uncertainty for third parties. Legal mechanisms, such as judicial oversight and anonymized award publications, alongside digital security measures, are essential to balance confidentiality and transparency. These approaches contribute to the development of consistent, accountable, and modern arbitration practices.
Confidentiality In The Arbitration Process And Its Implications For Legal Transparency Fitria Mukhtar Siregar; M. Abdillah; Suci Hidayati Malau; Raja Muda Pahlevi Siregar
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Januari
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1308

Abstract

This paper examines the application of the confidentiality principle in arbitration and its implications for legal transparency. Arbitration, as an alternative dispute resolution mechanism, emphasizes efficiency, procedural flexibility, and the protection of parties’ interests, with confidentiality serving to safeguard sensitive information, trade secrets, and corporate strategies. Using a qualitative descriptive-analytical approach, data were collected through literature studies, including legislation, arbitration rules, awards, and academic sources. The research was conducted systematically in several stages: identification of issues, collection of secondary data, qualitative analysis through thematic coding, and formulation of conclusions and recommendations. The findings indicate that while confidentiality ensures secure dispute resolution and protects business interests, it can hinder transparency, limit public access to legal information, and create uncertainty for third parties. Legal mechanisms, such as judicial oversight and anonymized award publications, alongside digital security measures, are essential to balance confidentiality and transparency. These approaches contribute to the development of consistent, accountable, and modern arbitration practices.
Co-Authors Annisa Putri Andini Tanjung M. Abdillah Muhammad Abdillah Nadilah Andini Rahma Fitri Amelia Hasibuan Raja Muda Pahlevi Siregar Suci Hidayati Malau