Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.92
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Case Law Konsensus: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi Jurnal CENDIKIA ISNU ISNU Nine-Star Multidisciplinary Journal (INS9MJ) Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU
Nadilah Andini
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
PENERAPAN ASAS-ASAS UMUM PEMERINTAHAN YANG BAIK DALAM PUTUSAN PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA Joni Sandri Ritonga; Rahma Fitri Amelia Hasibuan; Annisa Putri Sinaga; M. Fazli Pratama; Vressilia Witama; Faiz Putra Ramadhan Lubis; Nadilah Andini
Case Law : Journal of Law Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): Case Law : Journal of Law | Januari 2025
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Program Pasca Sarjana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25157/caselaw.v6i1.4731

Abstract

Penerapan asas-asas umum pemerintahan yang baik (AUPB) memiliki peran penting dalam penegakan hukum administrasi di Indonesia, khususnya dalam putusan peradilan tata usaha negara (PTUN). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bagaimana penerapan AUPB memengaruhi kualitas dan keadilan putusan PTUN. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah studi kepustakaan dengan mengkaji literatur, peraturan perundang-undangan, dan putusan PTUN yang relevan. AUPB, yang mencakup asas kepastian hukum, asas kecermatan, asas keterbukaan, dan asas profesionalitas, merupakan pedoman bagi hakim dalam menguji keputusan administrasi pemerintah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan AUPB dalam PTUN membantu menciptakan putusan yang tidak hanya memenuhi aspek formal hukum, tetapi juga substansi keadilan. Putusan PTUN yang berlandaskan AUPB mampu melindungi hak-hak masyarakat dari tindakan pemerintah yang sewenang-wenang, sekaligus mendorong akuntabilitas dan transparansi dalam pemerintahan. Namun, terdapat kendala dalam penerapannya, seperti kurangnya pemahaman hakim terhadap substansi AUPB dan lemahnya harmonisasi antara peraturan perundang-undangan dan prinsip AUPB. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan upaya penguatan kapasitas hakim, harmonisasi regulasi, dan sosialisasi AUPB kepada aparatur pemerintah. Dengan penerapan AUPB secara konsisten, PTUN dapat menjadi instrumen efektif dalam mewujudkan pemerintahan yang bersih dan berkeadilan.
Kontrak Kerja vs Kontrak Platform : Perbandingan Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pekerja di Era Ekonomi Digital Rahma Fitri Amelia Hasibuan; Muhammad Abdillah; Nadilah Andini; Fitria Mukhtar Siregar; Annisa Putri Andini Tanjung
Konsensus : Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Juni : KONSENSUS : Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti Dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/konsensus.v2i3.941

Abstract

The rapid development of the digital economy has transformed the labor landscape with the emergence of a new type of employment contract known as platform contracts, which differ from conventional formal employment contracts. This phenomenon poses significant challenges regarding legal protection for workers, especially in ensuring basic rights and social justice in the digital era. This study aims to analyze the comparison of legal protection between workers bound by formal employment contracts and digital platform workers. The research method used is qualitative descriptive with a literature review from various relevant primary and secondary sources. The results reveal that formal workers receive stronger and more comprehensive legal protection through existing labor regulations, whereas platform workers face legal status ambiguity, leading to minimal protection and risks of exploitation. This study emphasizes the importance of adaptive legal reforms to accommodate changes brought by the digital economy by expanding the definition of workers and providing equal legal protection for platform workers. In conclusion, regulatory updates and collaboration among various stakeholders are necessary to create a fair and sustainable work ecosystem in the digital era.
Annulment of Arbitral Awards as an Extraordinary Legal Remedy: Distortion or Protection of Justice Khairunnisa Siregar; Nadilah Andini; Suci Hidayati Malau; Raja Muda Pahlevi Siregar; Ahmad Yasin Dongoran
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Januari
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1304

Abstract

This paper examines the annulment of arbitral awards within the Indonesian legal system as an extraordinary legal remedy that intersects with the principles of arbitral autonomy and final and binding effect. The background of the study is grounded in the growing reliance on arbitration as an efficient and autonomous mechanism for resolving commercial disputes, alongside emerging controversies arising from judicial intervention in annulment proceedings. This research employs a normative legal method, using statutory and conceptual approaches. The research stages include identifying legal issues, collecting and classifying relevant legal materials, conducting normative analysis, and drawing deductive conclusions. The results and discussion demonstrate that Law Number 30 of 1999 strictly limits annulment to procedural defects of a fundamental nature, such as document forgery, decisive new evidence, or fraud, and does not permit substantive review of arbitral awards. However, judicial practice reveals interpretative inconsistencies that risk distorting arbitral finality. The study concludes that annulment should function as a procedural safeguard to protect justice without undermining the essence of arbitration.
The Relevance of the Concept of Hirabah to Organized Crime and Modern Terrorism Hairul Anam; Ahmad Rifai Yoga; Nadilah Andini; Wenni Nahdiani Tanjung; Suci Hidayati Malau
ISNU Nine-Star Multidisciplinary Journal Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Nine Star Januari
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/ins9mj.v3i1.1325

Abstract

This study examines the relevance of the concept of hirābah in Islamic criminal law to contemporary organized crime and terrorism. Historically, hirābah addresses acts of open violence that threaten public security, instill fear, and disrupt social order, with sanctions aimed at protecting life, property, and communal stability. Using a normative legal research method with a qualitative approach, the study analyzes classical fiqh texts, contemporary scholarship, and comparative legal frameworks to explore the elements, characteristics, and objectives of hirābah. The findings reveal substantial conceptual alignment between classical hirābah and modern forms of collective violence, as both involve deliberate acts that destabilize society and generate widespread fear. However, contemporary crimes exhibit complex ideological, transnational, and technological dimensions requiring normative adaptation. The study concludes that while hirābah provides a valuable legal and sociological framework, its application to modern criminality necessitates contextual reconstruction, integrating Islamic jurisprudence with national and international legal systems for effective prevention, deterrence, and public security.
Annulment of Arbitral Awards as an Extraordinary Legal Remedy: Distortion or Protection of Justice Khairunnisa Siregar; Nadilah Andini; Suci Hidayati Malau; Raja Muda Pahlevi Siregar; Ahmad Yasin Dongoran
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Januari
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1304

Abstract

This paper examines the annulment of arbitral awards within the Indonesian legal system as an extraordinary legal remedy that intersects with the principles of arbitral autonomy and final and binding effect. The background of the study is grounded in the growing reliance on arbitration as an efficient and autonomous mechanism for resolving commercial disputes, alongside emerging controversies arising from judicial intervention in annulment proceedings. This research employs a normative legal method, using statutory and conceptual approaches. The research stages include identifying legal issues, collecting and classifying relevant legal materials, conducting normative analysis, and drawing deductive conclusions. The results and discussion demonstrate that Law Number 30 of 1999 strictly limits annulment to procedural defects of a fundamental nature, such as document forgery, decisive new evidence, or fraud, and does not permit substantive review of arbitral awards. However, judicial practice reveals interpretative inconsistencies that risk distorting arbitral finality. The study concludes that annulment should function as a procedural safeguard to protect justice without undermining the essence of arbitration.
Co-Authors Ahmad Rifai Yoga Ahmad Yasin Dongoran Annisa Putri Andini Tanjung Annisa Putri Sinaga Faiz Putra Ramadhan Lubis Fitria Mukhtar Siregar Hairul Anam Joni Sandri Ritonga Khairunnisa Siregar M. Fazli Pratama Muhammad Abdillah Rahma Fitri Amelia Hasibuan Raja Muda Pahlevi Siregar Suci Hidayati Malau Vressilia Witama Wenni Nahdiani Tanjung