Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.006
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal CENDIKIA ISNU ISNU Nine-Star Multidisciplinary Journal (INS9MJ) Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU
Suci Hidayati Malau
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
Application of Ta'zir Punishment for Perpetrators of Corruption in the Perspective of Islamic Criminal Law Zaki Azmi Daffa; Alfiko Gio Pratama; Abdurrasyid Karim; Rayhan Nandini Telaumbanua; Suci Hidayati Malau
ISNU Nine-Star Multidisciplinary Journal Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Vol.2 No.3 Desember 2025
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/ins9mj.v2i3.938

Abstract

Corruption is an extraordinary crime that causes great losses to state finances, damages social order, and erodes public trust. In Indonesia's positive law, corruption has been regulated in detail through various laws. However, a normative approach alone is not enough to provide a deterrent effect on the perpetrators. Therefore, Islamic law as a legal system rich in moral values and substantive justice offers an alternative approach through the concept of ta'zir punishment. This study aims to examine how the application of ta'zir punishment can be relevant and effective against corrupt perpetrators in the perspective of Islamic criminal law. The method used is normative legal research with a conceptual and historical approach. Data was obtained through literature studies on primary sources of Islamic law such as the Qur'an, hadith, and fiqh books, and also through analysis of positive legal regulations in Indonesia. The results of the study show that corruption in Islamic law can be categorized as jarimah ta'zir, so that the form and degree of punishment can be determined by the competent authorities. The punishment of ta'zir is flexible and can be in the form of imprisonment, fines, restitution of property, and social or administrative punishment. The principles of justice and benefit contained in ta'zir are considered to be able to provide a deterrent effect while encouraging moral reform of the perpetrators. This concept is relevant to be integrated into the national legal system in terms of values and ethics.
Annulment of Arbitral Awards as an Extraordinary Legal Remedy: Distortion or Protection of Justice Khairunnisa Siregar; Nadilah Andini; Suci Hidayati Malau; Raja Muda Pahlevi Siregar; Ahmad Yasin Dongoran
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Januari
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1304

Abstract

This paper examines the annulment of arbitral awards within the Indonesian legal system as an extraordinary legal remedy that intersects with the principles of arbitral autonomy and final and binding effect. The background of the study is grounded in the growing reliance on arbitration as an efficient and autonomous mechanism for resolving commercial disputes, alongside emerging controversies arising from judicial intervention in annulment proceedings. This research employs a normative legal method, using statutory and conceptual approaches. The research stages include identifying legal issues, collecting and classifying relevant legal materials, conducting normative analysis, and drawing deductive conclusions. The results and discussion demonstrate that Law Number 30 of 1999 strictly limits annulment to procedural defects of a fundamental nature, such as document forgery, decisive new evidence, or fraud, and does not permit substantive review of arbitral awards. However, judicial practice reveals interpretative inconsistencies that risk distorting arbitral finality. The study concludes that annulment should function as a procedural safeguard to protect justice without undermining the essence of arbitration.
Confidentiality In The Arbitration Process And Its Implications For Legal Transparency Fitria Mukhtar Siregar; M. Abdillah; Suci Hidayati Malau; Raja Muda Pahlevi Siregar
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Januari
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1308

Abstract

This paper examines the application of the confidentiality principle in arbitration and its implications for legal transparency. Arbitration, as an alternative dispute resolution mechanism, emphasizes efficiency, procedural flexibility, and the protection of parties’ interests, with confidentiality serving to safeguard sensitive information, trade secrets, and corporate strategies. Using a qualitative descriptive-analytical approach, data were collected through literature studies, including legislation, arbitration rules, awards, and academic sources. The research was conducted systematically in several stages: identification of issues, collection of secondary data, qualitative analysis through thematic coding, and formulation of conclusions and recommendations. The findings indicate that while confidentiality ensures secure dispute resolution and protects business interests, it can hinder transparency, limit public access to legal information, and create uncertainty for third parties. Legal mechanisms, such as judicial oversight and anonymized award publications, alongside digital security measures, are essential to balance confidentiality and transparency. These approaches contribute to the development of consistent, accountable, and modern arbitration practices.
The Relevance of the Concept of Hirabah to Organized Crime and Modern Terrorism Hairul Anam; Ahmad Rifai Yoga; Nadilah Andini; Wenni Nahdiani Tanjung; Suci Hidayati Malau
ISNU Nine-Star Multidisciplinary Journal Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Nine Star Januari
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/ins9mj.v3i1.1325

Abstract

This study examines the relevance of the concept of hirābah in Islamic criminal law to contemporary organized crime and terrorism. Historically, hirābah addresses acts of open violence that threaten public security, instill fear, and disrupt social order, with sanctions aimed at protecting life, property, and communal stability. Using a normative legal research method with a qualitative approach, the study analyzes classical fiqh texts, contemporary scholarship, and comparative legal frameworks to explore the elements, characteristics, and objectives of hirābah. The findings reveal substantial conceptual alignment between classical hirābah and modern forms of collective violence, as both involve deliberate acts that destabilize society and generate widespread fear. However, contemporary crimes exhibit complex ideological, transnational, and technological dimensions requiring normative adaptation. The study concludes that while hirābah provides a valuable legal and sociological framework, its application to modern criminality necessitates contextual reconstruction, integrating Islamic jurisprudence with national and international legal systems for effective prevention, deterrence, and public security.
Annulment of Arbitral Awards as an Extraordinary Legal Remedy: Distortion or Protection of Justice Khairunnisa Siregar; Nadilah Andini; Suci Hidayati Malau; Raja Muda Pahlevi Siregar; Ahmad Yasin Dongoran
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Januari
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1304

Abstract

This paper examines the annulment of arbitral awards within the Indonesian legal system as an extraordinary legal remedy that intersects with the principles of arbitral autonomy and final and binding effect. The background of the study is grounded in the growing reliance on arbitration as an efficient and autonomous mechanism for resolving commercial disputes, alongside emerging controversies arising from judicial intervention in annulment proceedings. This research employs a normative legal method, using statutory and conceptual approaches. The research stages include identifying legal issues, collecting and classifying relevant legal materials, conducting normative analysis, and drawing deductive conclusions. The results and discussion demonstrate that Law Number 30 of 1999 strictly limits annulment to procedural defects of a fundamental nature, such as document forgery, decisive new evidence, or fraud, and does not permit substantive review of arbitral awards. However, judicial practice reveals interpretative inconsistencies that risk distorting arbitral finality. The study concludes that annulment should function as a procedural safeguard to protect justice without undermining the essence of arbitration.
Confidentiality In The Arbitration Process And Its Implications For Legal Transparency Fitria Mukhtar Siregar; M. Abdillah; Suci Hidayati Malau; Raja Muda Pahlevi Siregar
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Januari
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1308

Abstract

This paper examines the application of the confidentiality principle in arbitration and its implications for legal transparency. Arbitration, as an alternative dispute resolution mechanism, emphasizes efficiency, procedural flexibility, and the protection of parties’ interests, with confidentiality serving to safeguard sensitive information, trade secrets, and corporate strategies. Using a qualitative descriptive-analytical approach, data were collected through literature studies, including legislation, arbitration rules, awards, and academic sources. The research was conducted systematically in several stages: identification of issues, collection of secondary data, qualitative analysis through thematic coding, and formulation of conclusions and recommendations. The findings indicate that while confidentiality ensures secure dispute resolution and protects business interests, it can hinder transparency, limit public access to legal information, and create uncertainty for third parties. Legal mechanisms, such as judicial oversight and anonymized award publications, alongside digital security measures, are essential to balance confidentiality and transparency. These approaches contribute to the development of consistent, accountable, and modern arbitration practices.
Co-Authors Abdurrasyid Karim Ahmad Rifai Yoga Ahmad Yasin Dongoran Alfiko Gio Pratama Fitria Mukhtar Siregar Hairul Anam Khairunnisa Siregar M. Abdillah Nadilah Andini Raja Muda Pahlevi Siregar Rayhan Nandini Telaumbanua Wenni Nahdiani Tanjung Zaki Azmi Daffa