Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Enhancing The Teaching And Learning Of English For Specific Purposes (Esp) With Chatgpt Sarah Mohammed Alsanousi Alssayah Ahmed; Ayman Riheel Alnaas Taha; Sajjad Hussain; Ali Hayat
International Journal of Technology and Education Research Vol. 1 No. 03 (2023): July - September, International Journal of Technology and Education Research(I
Publisher : International journal of technology and education research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63922/ijeter.v1i03.458

Abstract

As a result of the implementation of ChatGPT into interactive learning tools for technical English, students can participate in conversational engagements that are analogous to actual engineering challenges encountered in the real world. Through this conversational interface, individual students can ask engineering-related questions, obtain accurate and useful responses via ChatGPT, and even receive comments and explanations. For example, students may question the differences between a transistor and a diode. ChatGPT can provide a response that is both precise and condensed, such as the following: "A transistor is an electronic device that has three terminals and is used for amplification and switching, whereas a diode is a device that has two terminals and is used for rectification and voltage regulation." In addition, ChatGPT helps simplify the learning process by giving examples of conversations that have already taken place between customers and engineers. Students can enhance their grammar and pronunciation skills by working through these dialogues. Because of this integration, ChatGPT now serves as an engaging and personalized conversation companion, assisting students in developing their technical English language abilities. This functionality allows ChatGPT to behave more like a traditional discussion forum.
Judicial Pardon in Contemporary Criminal Verdicts: Balancing Justice, Legal Certainty, and the Utility of Law Gregorius Widiartana; Sajjad Hussain
NUSANTARA: Journal Of Law Studies Vol. 4 No. 01 (2025): Nusantara: Journal of Law Studies
Publisher : Islamic Research Publiser

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17346796

Abstract

The authority of judges to grant judicial pardon—namely, the discretionary power to reduce or mitigate criminal sanctions—raises fundamental legal concerns in Indonesia's criminal justice system. While judicial discretion aims to humanise the law and consider individual circumstances of offenders, its unstructured and inconsistent application often undermines the core objectives of criminal punishment: justice, legal certainty, and legal utility. This article explores the main research questions: To what extent does judicial pardon align with the philosophical objectives of criminal sentencing? How does this practice affect legal certainty and the perception of justice in society? Employing a normative legal research method that draws on statutory, conceptual, and case-based approaches, this study critically analyses judicial decisions in which leniency or mitigation was granted under the banner of judicial pardon. The findings reveal that while judicial pardon is rooted in compassionate justice, its inconsistent use without clear normative guidelines leads to sentencing disparities, erodes public trust, and potentially weakens the deterrent effect of criminal law. Nonetheless, the study also finds that judicial pardon may serve rehabilitative and restorative aims when applied judiciously, particularly in cases involving vulnerable offenders or minor crimes. This research calls for a more transparent doctrinal framework and judicial standards to ensure that judicial pardons meaningfully contribute to the balance among justice, legal certainty, and the broader utility of law in criminal adjudication.