Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Wasatiyah: Journal of Religious Moderation Islamic Law and Social Issues in Society Islamic Law and Social Issues in Society
Lubis, Ismail Saleh
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Understanding Fiqh al-Muwāzanāt and Emotional Maturity in Religious Conflict Resolution Rahmadi, M. Agung; Said Agil Husin Al-Munawar; Nasution, Helsa; Mawar, Luthfiah; Sihombing, Nurzahara; Lubis, Ismail Saleh
Al-Wasatiyah: Journal of Religious Moderation Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Al-Wasatiyah: Journal of Religious Moderation
Publisher : Pusat Kajian Moderasi Beragama dan Ideologi Pancasila UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30631/jrm.v4i1.95

Abstract

This study uses a confirmatory factor analysis approach to explore the relationship between understanding fiqh al-muwāzanāt and emotional maturity in religious conflict resolution. Data was collected via an online survey involving 412 respondents (56.3% male; 43.7% female). The model testing results using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) demonstrated a strong model fit (χ² = 187.24, df = 76, p < 0.001, CFI = 0.942, TLI = 0.927, RMSEA = 0.058, SRMR = 0.043). Furthermore, the findings revealed a significant correlation between the understanding of fiqh al-muwāzanāt and emotional maturity (r = 0.68, p < 0.001), with both variables simultaneously exerting a substantial influence on individuals' ability to resolve religious conflicts (β = 0.42 and β = 0.37, p < 0.001). The mediation analysis results further indicated that emotional maturity mediates the relationship between fiqh al-muwāzanāt understanding and religious conflict resolution (indirect effect = 0.25, 95% CI [0.18, 0.32]). Thus, this study highlights the dynamic interaction between textual religious understanding and individuals' emotional regulation competencies, thereby expanding upon previous studies by Lattu and Schmidt et al., which primarily focused on the cognitive aspects of religious comprehension. Additionally, unlike Najib's study, which relied on a qualitative approach, this research provides empirical evidence through a quantitative-based validation of a more comprehensive theoretical model. Consequently, these findings underscore the urgency of integrating contextual religious understanding and emotional matrity as a strategic intervention approach for resolving religious conflicts in the digital era.
The Impact of Hudud Law Implementation on Emotional Regulation and Psychological Stability in Society Rahmadi, M. Agung; Al-Munawar, Said Agil Husin; Nasution, Helsa; Mawar, Luthfiah; Sihombing, Nurzahara; Lubis, Ismail Saleh
Islamic Law and Social Issues in Society Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Islamic Law and Social Issues in Society
Publisher : Tuah Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64929/ilsiis.v1i1.7

Abstract

This study investigates the psychological effects of ḥudūd law implementation, focusing on emotional regulation and psychological stability to address a significant gap in the legal psychology literature. While most discourse on ḥudūd law centers on its social and political dimensions, its influence on mental well-being remains underexplored. Using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), data were collected from 827 respondents across four countries - Saudi Arabia, Iran, Malaysia, and Indonesia - that differ in their enforcement of ḥudūd law. Instruments such as the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) and Psychological Stability Scale (PSS) were employed. The findings reveal strong, statistically significant relationships between perceptions of ḥudūd law and emotional regulation (β = 0.67, p < 0.001) as well as psychological stability (β = 0.58, p < 0.001). The SEM model demonstrates an excellent fit (CFI = 0.94, RMSEA = 0.047, TLI = 0.92), with emotional regulation identified as a key mediating factor (indirect effect = 0.38, p < 0.001). Multi-group analysis shows significant variations based on cultural background (χ² = 18.76, df = 4, p < 0.01) and religiosity (χ² = 22.34, df = 4, p < 0.001), underlining the role of sociocultural context. The study also highlights the moderating influence of procedural justice perceptions (β = 0.42, p < 0.01), which shape how individuals psychologically experience ḥudūd law. These results not only reinforce earlier findings by Al-Rodiman (2013) and Razif (2020) but also provide a counterpoint to Efendi et al. (2025), who emphasized negative outcomes. Ultimately, this research contributes to a nuanced understanding of how religious legal systems affect community mental health and offers insights for developing psychologically informed approaches to ḥudūd law policy.
The Impact of Hudud Law Implementation on Emotional Regulation and Psychological Stability in Society Rahmadi, M. Agung; Al-Munawar, Said Agil Husin; Nasution, Helsa; Mawar, Luthfiah; Sihombing, Nurzahara; Lubis, Ismail Saleh
Islamic Law and Social Issues in Society Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Islamic Law and Social Issues in Society
Publisher : Tuah Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64929/ilsiis.v1i1.7

Abstract

This study investigates the psychological effects of ḥudūd law implementation, focusing on emotional regulation and psychological stability to address a significant gap in the legal psychology literature. While most discourse on ḥudūd law centers on its social and political dimensions, its influence on mental well-being remains underexplored. Using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), data were collected from 827 respondents across four countries - Saudi Arabia, Iran, Malaysia, and Indonesia - that differ in their enforcement of ḥudūd law. Instruments such as the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) and Psychological Stability Scale (PSS) were employed. The findings reveal strong, statistically significant relationships between perceptions of ḥudūd law and emotional regulation (β = 0.67, p < 0.001) as well as psychological stability (β = 0.58, p < 0.001). The SEM model demonstrates an excellent fit (CFI = 0.94, RMSEA = 0.047, TLI = 0.92), with emotional regulation identified as a key mediating factor (indirect effect = 0.38, p < 0.001). Multi-group analysis shows significant variations based on cultural background (χ² = 18.76, df = 4, p < 0.01) and religiosity (χ² = 22.34, df = 4, p < 0.001), underlining the role of sociocultural context. The study also highlights the moderating influence of procedural justice perceptions (β = 0.42, p < 0.01), which shape how individuals psychologically experience ḥudūd law. These results not only reinforce earlier findings by Al-Rodiman (2013) and Razif (2020) but also provide a counterpoint to Efendi et al. (2025), who emphasized negative outcomes. Ultimately, this research contributes to a nuanced understanding of how religious legal systems affect community mental health and offers insights for developing psychologically informed approaches to ḥudūd law policy.
Co-Authors al-Munawar, Said Agil Husin Mawar, Luthfiah Nasution, Helsa Rahmadi, M. Agung Said Agil Husin Al-Munawar Sihombing, Nurzahara