Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

The Impact of Hudud Law Implementation on Emotional Regulation and Psychological Stability in Society Rahmadi, M. Agung; Al-Munawar, Said Agil Husin; Nasution, Helsa; Mawar, Luthfiah; Sihombing, Nurzahara; Lubis, Ismail Saleh
Islamic Law and Social Issues in Society Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Islamic Law and Social Issues in Society
Publisher : Tuah Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64929/ilsiis.v1i1.7

Abstract

This study investigates the psychological effects of ḥudūd law implementation, focusing on emotional regulation and psychological stability to address a significant gap in the legal psychology literature. While most discourse on ḥudūd law centers on its social and political dimensions, its influence on mental well-being remains underexplored. Using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), data were collected from 827 respondents across four countries - Saudi Arabia, Iran, Malaysia, and Indonesia - that differ in their enforcement of ḥudūd law. Instruments such as the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) and Psychological Stability Scale (PSS) were employed. The findings reveal strong, statistically significant relationships between perceptions of ḥudūd law and emotional regulation (β = 0.67, p < 0.001) as well as psychological stability (β = 0.58, p < 0.001). The SEM model demonstrates an excellent fit (CFI = 0.94, RMSEA = 0.047, TLI = 0.92), with emotional regulation identified as a key mediating factor (indirect effect = 0.38, p < 0.001). Multi-group analysis shows significant variations based on cultural background (χ² = 18.76, df = 4, p < 0.01) and religiosity (χ² = 22.34, df = 4, p < 0.001), underlining the role of sociocultural context. The study also highlights the moderating influence of procedural justice perceptions (β = 0.42, p < 0.01), which shape how individuals psychologically experience ḥudūd law. These results not only reinforce earlier findings by Al-Rodiman (2013) and Razif (2020) but also provide a counterpoint to Efendi et al. (2025), who emphasized negative outcomes. Ultimately, this research contributes to a nuanced understanding of how religious legal systems affect community mental health and offers insights for developing psychologically informed approaches to ḥudūd law policy.
The Impact of Hudud Law Implementation on Emotional Regulation and Psychological Stability in Society Rahmadi, M. Agung; Al-Munawar, Said Agil Husin; Nasution, Helsa; Mawar, Luthfiah; Sihombing, Nurzahara; Lubis, Ismail Saleh
Islamic Law and Social Issues in Society Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Islamic Law and Social Issues in Society
Publisher : Tuah Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64929/ilsiis.v1i1.7

Abstract

This study investigates the psychological effects of ḥudūd law implementation, focusing on emotional regulation and psychological stability to address a significant gap in the legal psychology literature. While most discourse on ḥudūd law centers on its social and political dimensions, its influence on mental well-being remains underexplored. Using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), data were collected from 827 respondents across four countries - Saudi Arabia, Iran, Malaysia, and Indonesia - that differ in their enforcement of ḥudūd law. Instruments such as the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) and Psychological Stability Scale (PSS) were employed. The findings reveal strong, statistically significant relationships between perceptions of ḥudūd law and emotional regulation (β = 0.67, p < 0.001) as well as psychological stability (β = 0.58, p < 0.001). The SEM model demonstrates an excellent fit (CFI = 0.94, RMSEA = 0.047, TLI = 0.92), with emotional regulation identified as a key mediating factor (indirect effect = 0.38, p < 0.001). Multi-group analysis shows significant variations based on cultural background (χ² = 18.76, df = 4, p < 0.01) and religiosity (χ² = 22.34, df = 4, p < 0.001), underlining the role of sociocultural context. The study also highlights the moderating influence of procedural justice perceptions (β = 0.42, p < 0.01), which shape how individuals psychologically experience ḥudūd law. These results not only reinforce earlier findings by Al-Rodiman (2013) and Razif (2020) but also provide a counterpoint to Efendi et al. (2025), who emphasized negative outcomes. Ultimately, this research contributes to a nuanced understanding of how religious legal systems affect community mental health and offers insights for developing psychologically informed approaches to ḥudūd law policy.
TRENDS IN MODERN WOMEN'S RELATIONS IN SOCIAL PROBLEMS: Islamic Law in Tafsir Al-Qurtubi Ida Syarifah, Zulfi; Al-Munawar, Said Agil Husin; Ulinniha, Muhammad; Muhammad, Habil Husna
Al-Risalah Vol 25 No 2 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30631/alrisalah.v25i2.1540

Abstract

This study aims to analyze modern women's relations and their accompanying social problems from an Islamic legal perspective, using Imam al-Qurtubi's Tafsir al-J?mi' li A?k?m al-Qur'?n as the primary reference. This research gap lies in the limited number of studies directly linking classical fiqh interpretations to contemporary women's socio-legal problems through contextual and socio-legal approaches. This study employed a qualitative approach using interpretive analysis and normative-contextual studies. Data were collected through a literature review of the Tafsir al-Qurtubi, fiqh books, and academic studies related to Islamic law and gender, enriched with empirical social data from official sources and social observations of modern women's relations. The analysis technique used is textual analysis, historical contextual analysis, and a comparative analysis between the normative construction of the interpretation and contemporary social reality. The results of this study indicate that although the Tafsir Al-Qur?ub? was born in a medieval patriarchal social context, it consistently positions women as equal legal and moral subjects. Key concepts such as qiw?mah (the act of worship), honor, and women's public role are interpreted as responsibility and protection, not as legitimacy of domination. Through this contextual reading, the Tafsir Al-Qur?ub? is relevant as a normative basis for formulating just, inclusive, and welfare-oriented legal solutions for modern women.