Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.702
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Kajian Informasi & Perpustakaan Khazanah: Jurnal Pengembangan Kearsipan Jurnal Teknodik ABDI PUSTAKA: Jurnal Perpustakaan dan Kearsipan
Sanbein, Primus
Unknown Affiliation
Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Library & Information Science Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Evaluasi Ketersediaan Sarana dan Prasarana Penyimpanan Arsip di Sekolah Pascasarjana, Institut Pertanian Bogor Sanbein, Primus; Sunarti, Titi Candra
ABDI PUSTAKA: Jurnal Perpustakaan dan Kearsipan Vol 5, No 1 (2025): Juni 2025
Publisher : Institut Seni Indonesia Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24821/jap.v5i1.14026

Abstract

Sarana dan prasarana merupakan sumber daya kearsipan yang sangat penting. Undang-Undang Nomor 43 Tahun 2009 tentang Kearsipan dalam Pasal 32 ayat 1 menyebutkan bahwa pencipta arsip dan lembaga arsip wajib menyediakan sarana dan prasarana kearsipan sesuai dengan standar kearsipan untuk pengelolaan arsip. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengevaluasi ketersediaan sarana dan prasarana dalam pengelolaan arsip di Sekolah Pascasarjana, Institut Pertanian Bogor. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif dengan pendekatan kuantitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) peningkatan volume arsip tidak sebanding dengan ketersediaan sarana penyimpanan arsip baik di sentral file sebagai penyimpanan arsip aktif maupun di record center sebagai tempat penyimpanan arsip inaktif dan arsip statis; (2) adanya keterbatasan ruang arsip baik di sentral file maupun record center sehingga penataan sarana penyimpanan arsip tidak memenuhi standar minimum sesuai Keputusan Kepala ANRI No. 3 Tahun 2000 tentang Standar Minimal Gedung dan Ruang Penyimpanan Arsip Inaktif. Evaluation of the Availability of Archives Storage Facilities and Infrastructure at the Graduate School of Bogor Agricultural University. Facilities and infrastructure are essential archival resources. Law Number 43 of 2009 concerning Archives in Article 32, paragraph 1 states that archive creators and archive institutions are required to provide archival facilities and infrastructure following archival standards for archive management. This study aimed to evaluate the availability of facilities and infrastructure in archive management at the Postgraduate School, Bogor Agricultural University. This research uses a descriptive method with a quantitative approach. The results showed that: (1) the increase in archive volume is not proportional to the availability of archive storage facilities both in the central file as active archive storage and in the record center as a place to store inactive archives and static archives; (2) there is limited archive space in both the central file and record center so that the arrangement of archive storage facilities does not meet the minimum standards according to the Decree of the Head of ANRI No. 3 of 2000 concerning Minimum Standards for Inactive Archive Storage Buildings and Rooms. 
Systematic review of archivists’ evolving ethics in the age of artificial intelligence Sanbein, Primus
Jurnal Kajian Informasi dan Perpustakaan Vol 13, No 1 (2025): Accredited by Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Re
Publisher : Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24198/jkip.v13i1.62811

Abstract

The development of artificial intelligence (AI) in the field of archiving raises new ethical challenges, such as algorithmic bias, loss of human context, and unclear accountability. Therefore, a systematic literature review is needed to understand how the ethics and professional values of archivists evolve in the face of AI-based digital transformation. This study aimed to determine how the ethics and professional values of archivists evolved in the era of artificial intelligence through an analysis of thematic patterns, ethical issues, and strategic responses that arose from human and AI interactions in archival practice. This study used the systematic literature review (SLR) method with reference to the PRISMA protocol. A total of 50 indexed and peer-reviewed journal articles published between 2018 and 2025 were analyzed, obtained from academic databases such as Scopus, SpringerLink, and Taylor & Francis. The analysis revealed five key domains: shifting roles and identities of archivists, reconfiguration of ethical principles in digital practice, dynamics of human–AI collaboration, reconstruction of professional values in an AI-based ecosystem, and strategic implications for strengthening the profession. The study concludes that archivists not only need to adapt to AI but also play an active role in guiding its implementation through ethical design, enhancing digital and ethical literacy, and updating professional codes of conduct. These efforts are essential to maintaining public trust, ensuring professional accountability, and ensuring the sustainability of the archivist’s role in an increasingly automated digital society.
ARSIP PERGURUAN TINGGI SEBAGAI SUMBER KECERDASAN SOSIAL AKADEMIK: INOVASI PENGELOLAAN DI ERA DIGITAL HUMAN-CENTERED Sanbein, Primus
Khazanah: Jurnal Pengembangan Kearsipan Vol 18, No 2 (2025): November 2025
Publisher : Perpustakaan dan Arsip Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/khazanah.106103

Abstract

This article aims to formulate a human-centered policy direction for university archival management in response to the challenges and opportunities of digital transformation. Adopting a qualitative-descriptive approach and a review of 38 national and international scholarly articles, this study explores the structural, technological, and philosophical dimensions influencing academic archival governance. The findings reveal that university archives play a strategic role not only as administrative instruments but also as spaces for institutional reflection, social dialogue, and the cultivation of collective intelligence within academic communities. Concepts such as collective intelligence, semantic systems, and participatory curation provide the foundation for inclusive and sustainable policy alternatives. This paper proposes five strategic directions: digital curation training, implementation of AI-based metadata systems, adoption of open interoperability models, institutionalization of campus-based digital curation units, and development of ethical guidelines grounded in inclusion and the right to memory. Through this approach, university digital archives can evolve into adaptive, reflective, and humanistic epistemic infrastructures that strengthen institutional memory resilience in the Society 5.0 era.
Kecerdasan Buatan Dalam Jaminan Mutu Akademik: Peluang Dan Tantangan Sanbein, Primus; Sarimanah, Eri
Jurnal TEKNODIK Jurnal Teknodik Vol. 29 No. 2, Desember 2025
Publisher : Pusat Data dan Teknologi Informasi Kementerian Pendidikan Kebudayaan, Riset dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32550/mc06k795

Abstract

The transformation of academic quality assurance in higher education is rapidly advancing with the rise of artificial intelligence (AI). This article reviews 41 peer-reviewed articles published between 2022 and 2025 to examine AI implementation in quality assurance across three dimensions: (1) the use of AI in monitoring and evaluation, (2) governance of academic integrity in the AI era, and (3) institutional readiness for technological change. Findings indicate that successful AI adoption depends on balancing technological effectiveness, ethical clarity, and adaptive, human-centred institutional support. While AI enhances efficiency in evaluation and adaptive assessment, challenges such as algorithmic bias, uneven staff capacity, and reactive policy frameworks persist. As a conceptual contribution, this article proposes an AI-based quality assurance framework comprising four components: automated and ethical evaluation, adaptive governance, human-centred institutional support, and AI–pedagogy alignment. Together, these components foster a reflective, collaborative, and sustainability-oriented academic quality ecosystem, while emphasising ethical values, local contexts, and institutional capacity-building. This study provides an early conceptual foundation for more responsive AI-informed quality assurance systems.
Co-Authors Eri Sarimanah Titi Candra Sunarti