Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Epistemologi: Menelusuri Hakikat Pengetahuan dan Kebenaran Dewi, Anita Candra; Azzahra, Andi Nayla; Ramadhani, Inaya Nadita; Anggini, Sri; Upairah, Ariqah
JURNAL EDUKASI NONFORMAL Vol 6 No 1 (2025): Jurnal Edukasi Nonformal
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Enrekang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji secara mendalam konsep dasar epistemologi, khususnya yang berkaitan dengan hakikat pengetahuan dan kebenaran. Metode yang digunakan adalah deskriptif kualitatif dengan pendekatan studi pustaka, di mana data diperoleh melalui proses baca, catat, dan telaah terhadap literatur filsafat, dengan penulis sebagai instrumen utama penelitian. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa epistemologi merupakan cabang filsafat yang membahas tentang asal-usul, hakikat, struktur, dan validitas pengetahuan. Pengetahuan dalam kajian ini tidak hanya dipahami sebagai informasi, tetapi sebagai hasil dari proses rasional yang sistematis dan dapat dipertanggungjawabkan. Ilmu pengetahuan harus memenuhi kriteria tertentu seperti memiliki objek kajian, metode yang sah, sistematika, dan bersifat universal. Sementara itu, kebenaran dalam konteks filsafat lebih menekankan pada koherensi logis dan argumentasi rasional dibandingkan dengan pembuktian empiris. Dengan demikian, epistemologi menjadi dasar penting dalam memahami bagaimana manusia memperoleh pengetahuan yang benar dan membedakannya dari bentuk keyakinan atau dugaan semata.
Students’ Subjective Evaluation: The Relationship between the Implementation of Deep Learning and Improvements in Writing Quality and Motivation Wahyuni, Ayunita; Dahlia, Dahlia; Ramadhani, Inaya Nadita; Dewi, Anita Candra
The Future of Education Journal Vol 5 No 2 (2026): IN PROGRESS
Publisher : Lembaga Penerbitan dan Publikasi Ilmiah Yayasan Pendidikan Tumpuan Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61445/tofedu.v5i2.1770

Abstract

This study is motivated by the differences in students’ writing quality despite being in relatively similar learning environments, which are presumed to be related to the implementation of deep learning. The study aims to explore students’ subjective evaluations of deep learning implementation and to analyze its relationship with improvements in writing quality and writing motivation. The research employed a quantitative method with a descriptive approach. Data were collected through a Likert-scale questionnaire distributed to 50 students at Universitas Negeri Makassar using purposive sampling. Data analysis was conducted using percentage index calculations. The results indicate that the implementation of deep learning falls into a very high category (83.1%), characterized by active student engagement, encouragement of critical thinking, and open discussion spaces. This condition shows a positive correlation with improvements in students’ writing quality (81.3%), particularly in the organization of ideas, coherence, and the use of references. In addition, writing motivation also demonstrates a positive trend (78.3%), especially in openness to revision and the ability to overcome writing difficulties, although aspects such as self-confidence and interest in publication remain relatively lower. Thus, deep learning contributes to improving students’ writing quality and motivation; however, these findings are contextual and do not yet indicate a causal relationship.