Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Legal Protection for Creditors in Commercial Property Disputes (Case Study of Batam District Court Decision No. 158/Pdt.G/Plw/Gs/2022/Pn Btm) Malau, Hotmaulina; Nurlaily, Nurlaily; Disemadi, Hari Sutra
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v5i4.1743

Abstract

Commercial property disputes are one of the significant challenges in business practice in Indonesia, especially in the legal relationship between creditors and debtors. This study aims to analyze legal protection for creditors in commercial property disputes through a case study of the Batam District Court Decision No. 158/Pdt.G/Plw/GS/2022/PN Btm. The methodology used is normative legal research with an analytical-descriptive approach, which examines laws and regulations and related court decisions. The results of the study show that in this case it includes three dimensions of legal protection according to Philipus M. Hadjon's theory, namely preventive, repressive, and curative. In the preventive dimension, protection is provided through the binding of dependent rights and the use of the cession mechanism as an anticipatory measure. The repressive dimension, lawsuits and cession recognition by the courts ensure that creditors' rights remain protected after a dispute has occurred. The curative dimension, guarantee execution and litigation process play a role in the recovery of creditor rights due to debtor default. However, the study also found weaknesses in the implementation of legal protection, especially related to the long legal process and bureaucracy in the execution of bail. This study concludes that legal protection for creditors in Indonesia has been well regulated normatively, but its implementation needs to be strengthened, especially in the efficiency of guarantee execution and dispute management. Recommendations are given to creditors, debtors, and governments to improve dispute management and legal protection within the commercial property sector
Legal Protection for Creditors in Commercial Property Disputes: A Case Study of the Court Decision Malau, Hotmaulina; Seroja, Triana Dewi; Sudirman, Lu
Jurnal Mediasas: Media Ilmu Syari'ah dan Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Mediasas: Media Ilmu Syariah dan Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah
Publisher : Islamic Family Law Department, STAI Syekh Abdur Rauf Aceh Singkil, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58824/mediasas.v8i1.326

Abstract

Commercial property disputes between creditors and debtors are on the rise, particularly in industrial cities such as Batam. Creditors frequently encounter significant challenges, including the risk of default, third-party claims, and obstacles in executing collateral—largely driven by regulatory uncertainty and weak law enforcement. This study aims to examine the legal protection available to creditors in commercial property disputes, with a focus on District Court Decision No. 158/Pdt.G/Plw/Gs/2022/PN Btm. Utilizing a normative juridical approach, the research highlights a clear disconnect between existing legal provisions and their practical implementation in safeguarding creditor rights. Key barriers faced by creditors include prolonged execution processes, lack of transparency in credit agreements, and insufficient financial literacy among debtors. [Semakin meningkat, terutama di kota industri seperti Batam. Kreditur sering menghadapi risiko wanprestasi, klaim pihak ketiga, dan hambatan eksekusi jaminan yang disebabkan oleh ketidakpastian regulasi serta lemahnya penegakan hukum. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perlindungan hukum bagi kreditur dalam sengketa properti komersial berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Batam No. 158/Pdt.G/Plw/Gs/2022/PN Btm. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat kesenjangan antara ketentuan hukum yang ada dengan implementasi perlindungan kreditur di lapangan. Hambatan utama yang dihadapi kreditur meliputi proses eksekusi yang berlarut-larut, kurangnya transparansi dalam perjanjian kredit, serta minimnya edukasi bagi debitur].