Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Masalah-Masalah Hukum National Multidisciplinary Sciences
Hermawan, Muhammad Ilham
Unknown Affiliation
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Restorative Justice sebagai Manifestasi Perlindungan Hak Asasi dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia Khasanofa , Auliya; Hermawan, Muhammad Ilham; Harmoko, Harmoko
National Multidisciplinary Sciences Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Proceeding MILENIUM 2
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32528/nms.v4i3.742

Abstract

Restorative justice merupakan pendekatan alternatif dalam sistem peradilan pidana yang berfokus pada pemulihan kerugian akibat tindak pidana melalui partisipasi aktif antara pelaku, korban, dan masyarakat. Dalam konteks ketatanegaraan Indonesia, penerapan restorative justice memiliki relevansi yang kuat dengan prinsip perlindungan hak asasi manusia (HAM) sebagaimana diatur dalam UUD NRI Tahun 1945. Pendekatan ini mencerminkan pergeseran paradigma dari keadilan retributif menuju keadilan substantif yang lebih humanis dan partisipatif. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bagaimana restorative justice berperan sebagai wujud perlindungan HAM dalam sistem ketatanegaraan, serta bagaimana prinsip negara hukum turut memfasilitasi implementasinya. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan yuridis-normatif dan telaah konstitusional, ditemukan bahwa restorative justice dapat memperkuat posisi korban, mencegah overkriminalisasi, dan mendukung prinsip due process of law. Lebih jauh, keberadaan restorative justice mendukung pelaksanaan tanggung jawab negara dalam melindungi hak-hak konstitusional warga negara, khususnya hak atas keadilan, kesetaraan di hadapan hukum, dan pemulihan. Namun, implementasinya memerlukan penguatan regulasi, sinergi kelembagaan, serta perubahan paradigma aparat penegak hukum. Kesimpulannya, restorative justice bukan hanya mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa pidana, tetapi juga representasi nilai-nilai HAM dalam sistem hukum nasional, serta manifestasi nyata dari prinsip negara hukum yang demokratis dan berkeadilan
GREGORY LEYH’S APPROACH TO CONSTITUTIONAL HERMENEUTICS: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF LEGAL HERMENEUTICS ACCORDING TO HANS-GEORG GADAMER Hermawan, Muhammad Ilham
Masalah-Masalah Hukum Vol 54, No 2 (2025): MASALAH-MASALAH HUKUM
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/mmh.54.2.2025.255-268

Abstract

Constitutional interpretation is a crucial and evolving field that extends beyond judges, involving legal scholars, citizens, and political theorists. It encompasses various methods such as originalism, textualism, moral reasoning, structural reasoning, and comparative constitutional law, each offering distinct approaches to understanding the Constitution. These methods are often categorized into two schools of thought: originalist and non-originalist. The debate between these two approaches has been a source of recurring controversy, with originalism advocating for adherence to the framers’ intentions and non-originalism promoting a more dynamic, “living” interpretation. Terence Ball emphasizes the significance of constitutional interpretation, dubbing it “deadly hermeneutics,” as a nation’s fate hinges on how its Constitution is understood and applied. While traditional theories focus on textual meaning or historical context, this article proposes that constitutional interpretation must also be approached ontologically—understanding the very essence of interpretation. Drawing on Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics, this study suggests that constitutional interpretation should be viewed as a dynamic process influenced by historical understanding, language, and societal context. Constitutional hermeneutics, as a theoretical framework, opposes rigid methodologies and emphasizes the role of language, historical context, and prejudices in shaping meaning. It offers a more holistic understanding, allowing for the Constitution to evolve with societal changes, ensuring its relevance in modern governance. This approach provides a more comprehensive solution to the challenges posed by the debate between originalism and non-originalism.
Co-Authors Harmoko Harmoko, Harmoko Khasanofa , Auliya