Luthfia, Nisha
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis Kriteria Kesahihan Matan dalam Hadis: Kajian Teori dan Metodologi Hikmah, Nur; Pangestu, Satrio Anugrah; Luthfia, Nisha
Journal of Hadith Studies Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): Journal of Hadith Studies
Publisher : ASILHA (Asosiasi Ilmu Hadis Indonesia)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32506/johs.v6i2-02

Abstract

The issue of hadith authenticity, particularly among Orientalist scholars, has generated a critical and controversial discourse. Prophetic hadith is often perceived as irrelevant to contemporary realities, largely due to the socio-cultural and environmental contexts in which it originated. This situation highlights the need for focused studies on matn (textual) criticism to identify the core criteria most commonly used in assessing the authenticity of hadith texts. This study addresses two main questions: (1) Have the criteria for matn authenticity evolved? and (2) How can these criteria be applied to contemporary issues? The research employs a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method, based on journal articles and books published between 2015 and 2023. Sources were collected using keywords such as “matn criticism” and “textual authenticity,” retrieved from Google Scholar and Semantic Scholar, then analyzed and displayed in tabular form. The findings indicate a notable evolution in methodological approaches and perspectives on hadith authenticity. Scholars have increasingly adopted contextual and hermeneutical frameworks to interpret hadith in light of current socio-historical realities. The debate on the validity of hadith texts also reflects shifting views on canonical collections like Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī and Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim. These developments illustrate the methodological diversity and the ongoing efforts to reinterpret Islamic intellectual heritage in a way that responds to modern challenges.
A Semantic Analysis of the Words 'Afuw' and 'Gafūr' in the Qur'an: The Perspective of Muhammad Syahrur's Anti-Synonymy Theory Luthfia, Nisha; Aini, Nur; Jabpar, Abdul
Kutubkhanah Vol 25, No 2 (2025): December
Publisher : Lembaga penelitian dan pengabdian kepada masyrakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24014/kutubkhanah.v25i2.32130

Abstract

This study aims to examine thedifferencesin meaning between the terms‘afwand gafūr in the Qur’an by employing Muhammad Syahrur’s theory of non-synonymy. The purpose of this research is to understand the foundationalprinciplesunderlying Syahrur’s non-synonymy theory and to explore the implications of applying this framework to two Qur’anic terms commonly considered synonymous. The research methodutilizessemantic analysis, which is then connected to Syahrur’s theoretical perspective on non-synonymy. The findings ultimately support Syahrur’s theory. The analysis of the Qur’anic usage of‘afwand gafūr reveals a clear differentiation in meaning between the domains of social ethics and the theological dimension of divine forgiveness. The terms‘afwand gafūr differ intheirvertical and horizontal relational dimensions:‘afwoperates within horizontal human relations, whereas gafūr pertains to vertical divine-human relations, giving each term complementary ethical and spiritual functions.Additionally,the two terms differ in their inclusivity and exclusivity regarding the scope of forgiveness. This distinction has significant implications for the development of Islamic social ethics and deepens the understanding of God’s mercy and forgiveness.