Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Improving The Quality Of Education In Indonesia With The "Kartini" Approach Gusni Cahaya Putri; Evandito Raihan Prayoga; Prio Agus Santoso
Proceeding of the International Conference on Global Education and Learning Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): June : Proceeding of the International Conference on Global Education and Learn
Publisher : Asosiasi Riset Ilmu Pendidikan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/icgel.v1i1.81

Abstract

The decline in the quality of education in Indonesia is caused by unplanned curriculum changes, a shortage of competent educators, and a lack of good manners and behavior among students and educators, which hinders the achievement of educational goals to create a smart, qualified, and competitive generation at the global level. The purpose of writing this essay is to explore and develop thoughts on how the "KARTINI" Approach is to improve the quality of education in Indonesia by emphasizing six key values: Culture, Artificial Intelligence (AI), Taqwa, Integrity, Nationalism, and Independence. Culture-based education aims to cultivate students' character rooted in the nation's cultural values and the ability to adapt to changing times. The application of AI in education allows for more personalized and effective learning, while the value of piety teaches morality and spiritual awareness. Integrity forms an honest and responsible character, nationalism builds a sense of love for the homeland, and independence teaches independence. By integrating these values, Indonesian education is expected to produce a generation that excels academically and has a strong character to contribute to the progress of the nation.
Analisis Implementasi Reforma Agraria dalam Penyelesaian Konflik Lahan di Indonesia (2024–2025) Gusni Cahaya Putri; Lies Kussetyowati; Evandito Raihan Prayoga; Diafra Banowati; Yosua Nugroho Yadiyanto; Yohan Dwi Prasetyo; Azhar Rashed
JURNAL ILMIAH RESEARCH STUDENT Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Maret
Publisher : KAMPUS AKADEMIK PUBLISING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61722/jirs.v3i1.8636

Abstract

Artikel ini mengkaji implementasi kebijakan reforma agraria di Indonesia selama periode 2024–2025 dan relevansinya dalam penyelesaian konflik lahan. Studi ini berfokus pada program-program nasional utama seperti Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap (PTSL), Kebijakan Satu Peta, dan skema Perhutanan Sosial. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan analisis kebijakan kualitatif, artikel ini menganalisis efektivitas, tantangan, dan hasil dari program-program ini dalam mengatasi tumpang tindih klaim lahan dan konflik agraria struktural. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa sementara inisiatif reforma agraria telah memperkuat kepastian hukum dan mengurangi tumpang tindih administrasi, tantangan tetap ada, terutama mengenai klaim tanah adat, kapasitas kelembagaan, dan ego sektoral. Artikel ini diakhiri dengan rekomendasi berorientasi kebijakan untuk meningkatkan peran reforma agraria dalam mencapai keadilan sosial dan tata kelola lahan yang berkelanjutan.
Analisis Yuridis Kekuatan Bukti Elektronik Berdasarkan Hukum Acara Perdata Gusni Cahaya Putri; Evandito Raihan Prayoga; Abram Sahing; Febri Gumelar
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Hukum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Juni: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/prosemnashuk.v3i1.86

Abstract

The development of information and communication technology has increased the use of electronic documents in legal and business activities, thereby affecting the evidentiary system in Indonesian civil procedural law. This study aims to analyze the legal regulation of electronic evidence and its evidentiary strength in resolving civil cases under Indonesian civil procedural law. The research method used is normative juridical research with statutory and library research approaches. The data were obtained from primary and secondary legal materials and analyzed qualitatively. The results show that electronic evidence has been legally recognized through Law Number 11 of 2008 in conjunction with Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions. Its evidentiary strength has the same legal position as other forms of evidence as long as it fulfills the requirements of authenticity, integrity, and validity of electronic data. Therefore, more detailed regulations regarding authentication standards and examination procedures for electronic evidence are still needed to ensure legal certainty in civil court practices.