Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Penerapan Pidana Tambahan Dalam Kuhp Baru: Kebiri Kimia Dan Publikasi Identitas Pelaku Percabulan Anak Suciara, Angelica; Idias, Bryan; Siregar, Nathasya Jhonray; Siregar, Tasya Amira Frananda; Prabowo, Tri Widyasto
Jurnal Multidisiplin Dehasen (MUDE) Vol 4 No 2 (2025): April
Publisher : LPPJPHKI Universitas Dehasen Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37676/mude.v4i2.8273

Abstract

Several countries have implemented policies of chemical castration and the publication of the identities of child sex offenders as preventive measures and to protect the public. Chemical castration is applied in countries such as the United States, although its implementation varies depending on the laws of each individual state. In Poland, chemical castration is mandatory for offenders who have committed sexual crimes against children under the age of 15. South Korea also enforces a similar policy for offenders targeting children under the age of 16. Meanwhile, in Russia, chemical castration is carried out on a voluntary basis. On the other hand, the publication of offenders’ identities is also a form of additional punishment adopted in several countries. The United States has a Sex Offender Registry system that allows the public to access information about individuals convicted of sexual offenses. The United Kingdom applies the Child Sex Offender Disclosure Scheme, which permits authorities to disclose the identity of offenders to parents or concerned parties. Canada also allows the publication of offender identities for those considered high-risk, aiming to increase public awareness and vigilance.
Tumpang Tindih Kewenangan Bawaslu, DKPP Dan PTUN Dalam Sengketa Pilkada Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Hukum Suciara, Angelica; Idias, Bryan; Siregar, Nathasya Jhonray; Siregar, Tasya Amira Frananda; Prabowo, Tri Widyasto
Jurnal Multidisiplin Dehasen (MUDE) Vol 4 No 2 (2025): April
Publisher : LPPJPHKI Universitas Dehasen Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37676/mude.v4i2.8274

Abstract

This article discusses the disharmony of authority among The General Election Supervisory Agency (Bawaslu), the Election Organizer Ethics Council (DKPP), and the Administrative Court (PTUN) in resolving regional election (Pilkada) disputes, particularly administrative disputes. The study aims to analyze the potential overlaps in jurisdiction among these institutions and their impact on legal certainty and the protection of constitutional rights of Pilkada participants. This research employs a normative legal approach supported by case studies of Pilkada dispute decisions handled simultaneously by the three institutions. The findings reveal that the absence of clear procedural boundaries leads to systemic confusion, undermines institutional effectiveness, and harms citizens' rights. This research employs a normative legal approach supported by case studies of Pilkada dispute decisions handled simultaneously by the three institutions. The findings reveal that the absence of clear procedural boundaries leads to systemic confusion, undermines institutional effectiveness, and harms citizens' rights.
Sita Jaminan Dalam Penerapan Tata Laksana Hukum Acara Perdata Al Anshari, Abu Thalhah; Sibarani, Clarisa Sondang; Ratrisari, Elizabeth Prima; Dewani, Maheswari Queena; Napitu, Olivia Panjiani; Januarita, Shintia; Prabowo, Tri Widyasto; Hutahaean, Triani Cahya; Atmadja, Wilhelmina Setia; Ginting, Yuni Priskila
Jurnal Hukum dan HAM Wara Sains Vol 4 No 01 (2025): Jurnal Hukum dan HAM Wara Sains
Publisher : Westscience Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58812/jhhws.v4i01.1684

Abstract

Tindakan hukum yang diambil untuk melindungi hak-hak penggugat atas hak tergugat sebelum adanya keputusan pengadilan hubungan antara sita jaminan dan hak asasi manusia (HAM), bertujuan untuk menganalisis dampak sita jaminan terhadap HAM serta mengidentifikasi perlindungan yang diperlukan. Menggunakan metode kualitatif, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa pelaksanaan sita jaminan dapat melanggar hak individu jika tidak dilakukan secara transparan. Hasilnya menunjukkan pentingnya prosedur hukum yang adil untuk menjaga keseimbangan antara kepentingan penggugat dan hak tergugat. Rekomendasi kebijakan diharapkan dapat meningkatkan perlindungan HAM, sehingga praktik sita jaminan di pengadilan lebih menghormati hak-hak individu dan keadilan sosial.