Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Tinjauan Normatif atas Kekosongan Regulasi Teknis dan Lemahnya Budaya Hukum Pejabat Administratif Ratrisari, Elizabeth Prima; Rajagukguk, Jemimah Puteri; Manalu, Veronica Enjelina
Jurnal Multidisiplin Dehasen (MUDE) Vol 4 No 2 (2025): April
Publisher : LPPJPHKI Universitas Dehasen Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37676/mude.v4i2.8275

Abstract

The enforcement of decisions by the Administrative Court (PTUN) is essential for upholding the rule of law and protecting citizens from harmful administrative acts. However, its effectiveness is hindered by low compliance, lack of clear execution mechanisms, weak sanctions, and limited oversight. This study uses a normative legal approach and qualitative methods to analyze these challenges and identify solutions. Findings highlight the absence of technical regulations and a weak legal culture among officials as key issues. To improve enforcement, this study recommends clearer execution rules, expanded PTUN authority, stronger institutional oversight, and active presidential involvement through performance evaluations. Strengthening these aspects will enhance legal certainty and public trust in administrative justice.
Dynamics of Contract Cancellation in Civil Law and its Relevance for Consumer Protection: Dinamika Pembatalan Kontrak dalam Hukum Perdata dan Relevansinya bagi Perlindungan Konsumen Ratrisari, Elizabeth Prima; Rajagukguk, Jemimah Puteri; Napitu, ⁠Olivia Panjiani; Manalu , Veronica Enjelina; Ginting, Gavra Natadavie
Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review Vol. 20 No. 2 (2025): May
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/ijler.v20i2.1290

Abstract

Background (General): Contract annulment plays a significant role in upholding legal certainty and fairness within civil law frameworks. Background (Specific): In Indonesia, the Civil Code (KUH Perdata) provides the basis for contract validity, focusing on essential elements such as consent, legal capacity, and lawful object. Knowledge Gap: However, there is limited comprehensive analysis of how principles like good faith and fairness influence contract annulment beyond formal legal criteria. Aim: This study aims to examine the legal grounds, procedures, and implications of contract cancellation in Indonesia, particularly under the Civil Code, Consumer Protection Law, and Electronic Information and Transactions Law. Results: Through normative juridical analysis and case law review, the findings reveal that annulment is influenced not only by statutory violations but also by equitable considerations, such as imbalance in bargaining power and misrepresentation. Novelty: The study highlights how Indonesian courts increasingly incorporate substantive justice and good faith into annulment decisions, marking a shift from rigid formalism. Implications: These findings offer valuable insights for legal practitioners and business actors in mitigating contractual disputes and aligning agreements with evolving judicial interpretations. Highlights: Emphasizes the role of fairness and good faith in contract annulment. Integrates statutory analysis with judicial interpretation. Highlights practical implications for legal and business practices. Keywords: Contract Annulment, Civil Law, Legal Protection.
Sita Jaminan Dalam Penerapan Tata Laksana Hukum Acara Perdata Al Anshari, Abu Thalhah; Sibarani, Clarisa Sondang; Ratrisari, Elizabeth Prima; Dewani, Maheswari Queena; Napitu, Olivia Panjiani; Januarita, Shintia; Prabowo, Tri Widyasto; Hutahaean, Triani Cahya; Atmadja, Wilhelmina Setia; Ginting, Yuni Priskila
Jurnal Hukum dan HAM Wara Sains Vol 4 No 01 (2025): Jurnal Hukum dan HAM Wara Sains
Publisher : Westscience Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58812/jhhws.v4i01.1684

Abstract

Tindakan hukum yang diambil untuk melindungi hak-hak penggugat atas hak tergugat sebelum adanya keputusan pengadilan hubungan antara sita jaminan dan hak asasi manusia (HAM), bertujuan untuk menganalisis dampak sita jaminan terhadap HAM serta mengidentifikasi perlindungan yang diperlukan. Menggunakan metode kualitatif, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa pelaksanaan sita jaminan dapat melanggar hak individu jika tidak dilakukan secara transparan. Hasilnya menunjukkan pentingnya prosedur hukum yang adil untuk menjaga keseimbangan antara kepentingan penggugat dan hak tergugat. Rekomendasi kebijakan diharapkan dapat meningkatkan perlindungan HAM, sehingga praktik sita jaminan di pengadilan lebih menghormati hak-hak individu dan keadilan sosial.