Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Awang Long Law Review Journal of Social Research Jurnal Hukum dan HAM Wara Sains
Atmadja, Wilhelmina Setia
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR UNHYGIENIC PRACTICES AT SEC BOWL RESTAURANT Anshari, Abu Thalhah Al; Ratrisasi, Elizabeth Prima; Dewani, Maheswari Queena; Januarita, Shintia; Atmadja, Wilhelmina Setia
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v7i2.1536

Abstract

One of the restaurants that announced the permanent closure of its restaurant branch in Kuningan Jakarta is the Sec Bowl restaurant. The Sec Bowl restaurant is allegedly permanently closed because of a video influencer named Codeblu. Real name William Anderson, he is known as a restaurant and food reviewer who has 14 million followers on TikTok. The content he often uploads is criticism or praise in the form of photos or videos of the food he has tried. Codeblu made a reaction video to a photo sent to him, which showed the condition of the toilet at Sec Bowl. In his video, the influencer said that the place was "very unhygienic" and "very inhumane". Codeblu also suspected that the rice bowl restaurant had violated many ethics and laws. This is certainly very detrimental to consumers. The video has received 62.4 thousand likes and has been shared 15.2 thousand times. The problem is how is the legal regulation of Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) to prevent unhygienic practices in restaurants? What is the legal accountability for unhygienic practices at the Sec Bowl restaurant? The research method used is normative juridical. The results of the study are legal regulations on Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) to prevent unhygienic practices in restaurants that in the case of the Sec Bowl restaurant does not have a Certificate of Hygiene Sanitation (LHS) as per the Regulation of the Minister of Health Number 2 of 2023 page 62 Number 6 point F and legal liability for unhygienic practices at the Sec Bowl restaurant, namely negligence tort liability. In addition, liability for unhygienic practices at the Sec Bowl restaurant can be in the form of compensation if a consumer experiences health problems caused by food from the restaurant.
Fault-Based Liability Vs. Strict Liability: Comparative Study of the Concept of Unlawful Acts Indonesia – Japan Atmadja, Wilhelmina Setia; Datadavie Ginting, Gavra; Queena Dewani, Maheswari; Wijaya, Jason Marvin; Satyawada Pattiwael , Rastra Judea
Journal of Social Research Vol. 4 No. 10 (2025): Journal of Social Research
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/josr.v4i10.2825

Abstract

This research analyzes the comparative concepts of fault-based liability and strict liability in torts under Indonesian and Japanese civil law. Although both jurisdictions adopt the European-Continental legal system, the approaches to liability reflect different historical, political, and social contexts. The research employs a normative (doctrinal) juridical approach, supported by secondary legal materials. Findings show that fault-based liability, as codified under Article 1365 of the Civil Code and Article 700 of the Civil Code of Japan, remains the general principle in determining liability, placing the burden of proof on plaintiffs. However, strict liability has emerged in special laws, particularly in consumer protection and environmental law. Landmark cases such as PT Newmont Minahasa Raya in Indonesia and the Minamata case in Japan illustrate the challenges and transitions between these two liability regimes. The study concludes that a balanced dual approach is necessary. Fault-based liability ensures legal certainty and fairness for defendants, while strict liability strengthens victim protection and deterrence. Ultimately, harmonizing both principles enhances access to justice, accommodates social needs, and aligns with global legal trends.
Sita Jaminan Dalam Penerapan Tata Laksana Hukum Acara Perdata Al Anshari, Abu Thalhah; Sibarani, Clarisa Sondang; Ratrisari, Elizabeth Prima; Dewani, Maheswari Queena; Napitu, Olivia Panjiani; Januarita, Shintia; Prabowo, Tri Widyasto; Hutahaean, Triani Cahya; Atmadja, Wilhelmina Setia; Ginting, Yuni Priskila
Jurnal Hukum dan HAM Wara Sains Vol 4 No 01 (2025): Jurnal Hukum dan HAM Wara Sains
Publisher : Westscience Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58812/jhhws.v4i01.1684

Abstract

Tindakan hukum yang diambil untuk melindungi hak-hak penggugat atas hak tergugat sebelum adanya keputusan pengadilan hubungan antara sita jaminan dan hak asasi manusia (HAM), bertujuan untuk menganalisis dampak sita jaminan terhadap HAM serta mengidentifikasi perlindungan yang diperlukan. Menggunakan metode kualitatif, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa pelaksanaan sita jaminan dapat melanggar hak individu jika tidak dilakukan secara transparan. Hasilnya menunjukkan pentingnya prosedur hukum yang adil untuk menjaga keseimbangan antara kepentingan penggugat dan hak tergugat. Rekomendasi kebijakan diharapkan dapat meningkatkan perlindungan HAM, sehingga praktik sita jaminan di pengadilan lebih menghormati hak-hak individu dan keadilan sosial.
Co-Authors Al Anshari, Abu Thalhah Anshari, Abu Thalhah Al Datadavie Ginting, Gavra Dewani, Maheswari Queena Hutahaean, Triani Cahya Januarita, Shintia Napitu, Olivia Panjiani Prabowo, Tri Widyasto Queena Dewani, Maheswari Ratrisari, Elizabeth Prima Ratrisasi, Elizabeth Prima Satyawada Pattiwael , Rastra Judea Sibarani, Clarisa Sondang Wijaya, Jason Marvin Yuni Priskila Ginting