Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.751
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Awang Long Law Review International Journal of Social Service and Research JURNAL ILMIAH GEMA PERENCANA J-CEKI
Muchtarom, Achmad
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Strategy for Strengthening the Implementation of Progressive Law in the Republic of Indonesia National Police Muchtarom, Achmad; Barthos, Megawati
International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): International Journal of Social Service and Research
Publisher : Ridwan Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/ijssr.v5i6.1246

Abstract

Law enforcement in Indonesia today faces serious challenges, especially in maintaining a balance between procedural justice and substantive justice. The Indonesian National Police as one of the law enforcement institutions has a strategic role in realizing a legal system that is not only based on normative legality, but also upholds the values of humanity, morality, and social justice. In this context, the progressive legal approach introduced by Satjipto Rahardjo is very relevant to be adopted and implemented by the Indonesian National Police. Progressive law offers a new paradigm in law enforcement that sides with the people, rejects procedural rigidity, and prioritizes humanitarian values as the substance of law. This study aims to normatively examine the concept of progressive law about the role and function of the Indonesian National Police and to formulate strategies that can be used to strengthen the implementation of the progressive legal approach within the Indonesian National Police. This study uses a normative juridical method, with a statutory regulatory approach and a conceptual approach. The legal materials used consist of primary legal materials such as the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, Law Number 2 of 2002 concerning the Indonesian National Police, and other related regulations. In addition, secondary legal materials are also used in the form of legal literature, scientific journals, and the views of legal experts on progressive law. This study is expected to provide theoretical contributions to the development of progressive legal discourse and provide a conceptual basis for institutional renewal within the National Police to create just and humanistic law enforcement.
Implementasi Polisi Masyarakat (Polmas) sebagai Instrumen Hukum dalam Penguatan Kohesi Sosial di Masyarakat Muchtarom, Achmad; Hoesein, Zainal Arifin
J-CEKI : Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah Vol. 5 No. 1: Desember 2025
Publisher : CV. ULIL ALBAB CORP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/jceki.v5i1.13826

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji implementasi Polisi Masyarakat (Polmas) sebagai instrumen hukum untuk memperkuat kohesi sosial. Kompleksitas kejahatan mendorong Polri bertransformasi dari pendekatan represif menuju model preventif dan partisipatif. Polmas, yang merupakan adaptasi Community Policing berbasis nilai sosial-budaya Indonesia, memposisikan masyarakat sebagai mitra sejajar melalui prinsip partisipasi, kesetaraan, dan transparansi. Dengan metode penelitian hukum normatif melalui statute approach dan analisis bahan hukum primer-sekunder, penelitian ini menilai efektivitas Polmas dalam membangun hubungan harmonis antara polisi dan warga. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa pelaksanaan Polmas melalui FKPM dan peran Bhabinkamtibmas meningkatkan keterlibatan masyarakat dalam pencegahan kejahatan, penyelesaian konflik, serta pemeliharaan ketertiban umum. Polmas berfungsi tidak hanya sebagai strategi keamanan, tetapi juga sebagai instrumen hukum yang mendorong keadilan restoratif, gotong royong, dan solidaritas sosial. Secara keseluruhan, Polmas memperkuat legitimasi Polri dan mendukung terciptanya sistem keamanan yang inklusif dan berkeadilan.
COMPARISON OF THE DEPTH OF INDIGENOUS INTELLIGENCE WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE ENFORCEMENT OF CUSTOMARY LAW IN INDONESIA Andra Bani Sagalane; Muchtarom, Achmad; Nasaruddin; Manyata, Bakas; Saptomo, Ade
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v8i1.1794

Abstract

This paper discusses the comparison between the depth of indigenous intelligence and artificial intelligence (AI) in resolving customary law cases, with a focus on the Cambokh Sumbai practice in the Lampung indigenous community. Customary law is understood as a flexible, dynamic, and contextual system based on moral ethos and cultural values that are alive in community practices. The research method used a descriptive qualitative approach with normative juridical methods and case studies. The findings show that traditional leaders produce decisions that are quick but still socially accurate because they understand kinship relations, moral values, and the internal social dynamics of the community. In contrast, artificial intelligence has limitations in processing cultural variables that are not digitally documented, so that its reasoning is generalist and unable to penetrate the social context. In conclusion, customary law through the practice of Cambokh Sumbai is a tangible manifestation of substantive justice and the implementation of Pancasila values in the lives of indigenous peoples in Indonesia.
Efisiensi Ekonomi Postner dan Kritik Terhadap Keadilan Sosial Siagian, Amrizal; Muchtarom, Achmad; Karyono, Ario; Benjamin, Biem Triani; Santiago, Faisal
JURNAL ILMIAH GEMA PERENCANA Vol 4 No 3 (2026): Jurnal Ilmiah Gema Perencana
Publisher : POKJANAS Bekerja Sama Biro Perencanaan dan Penganggaran, Sekretariat Jenderal Kementerian Agama RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61860/jigp.v4i3.349

Abstract

The dominance of the law and economics approach, championed by Richard A. Posner, promotes wealth maximization and economic efficiency as the paramount objectives of law. This creates a fundamental gap with distributive justice theories, which posit that the law's primary ethical duty is to ensure equity and moral fairness. The central problem is the apparent tension between a legal system designed for optimal resource allocation and one obligated to deliver social justice, raising critical questions about law's normative foundations. This dialectic is especially significant for pluralistic jurisdictions like Indonesia, where legal ideals must reconcile with socio-cultural values. This study employs qualitative method with a normative-philosophical research design, conducting a critical analysis of primary texts from Posner, Rawls, Sen, and Dworkin. The analytical method involves philosophical argumentation and comparative legal theory to deconstruct the premises and implications of both paradigms. The analysis reveals that while economic efficiency offers a valuable practical framework for predicting behavioral incentives and evaluating legal outcomes, it operates within an amoral calculus that fails to address fundamental questions of rights, dignity, and equitable distribution. As a result, efficiency cannot support social justice as the ethical cornerstone of law. For Indonesia, this necessitates a constitutional synthesis where efficiency-based instruments are consciously subordinated to and harmonized with the principles of Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution, which enshrine social justice. Therefore, it is recommended that Indonesian legal scholarship and policymaking explicitly adopt an integrated framework where efficiency serves as a tool within, not the goal of, a justice-oriented legal system.
Co-Authors Ade Saptomo Andra Bani Sagalane Barthos, Megawati Benjamin, Biem Triani Faisal Santiago, Faisal Karyono, Ario Manyata, Bakas Nasaruddin SIAGIAN, AMRIZAL Zainal Arifin Hoesein