Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Sosial dan Sains Priviet Social Sciences Journal
Suhendra, Christabel Daniella
Unknown Affiliation
Astronomy Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Physics Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Force Majeure dan Implikasinya terhadap Perjanjian Kredit Raisya, Ashila; Suhendra, Christabel Daniella; Sastraatmaja, Keisha Nadine; Parhusip, Naomi Inly
Jurnal sosial dan sains Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025): Jurnal Sosial dan Sains
Publisher : Green Publisher Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59188/jurnalsosains.v5i5.32187

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memahami dasar hukum dan implikasi dari force majeure dalam perjanjian kredit, dengan fokus pada dampak pandemi COVID-19 terhadap sektor keuangan dan perlindungan konsumen. Pandemi yang dikategorikan sebagai force majeure relatif melalui Keputusan Presiden Nomor 12 Tahun 2020 memberikan dasar hukum bagi restrukturisasi kredit tanpa menghapus kewajiban debitur. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dan studi kasus Putusan No.347/Pdt/2021/PT SMG, penelitian ini menelusuri efektivitas penerapan force majeure serta sejauh mana lembaga keuangan mematuhi ketentuan OJK dan Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun restrukturisasi kredit diatur melalui POJK No.11/POJK.03/2020, pelaksanaannya masih menghadapi kendala, terutama terkait pemahaman konsumen atas haknya dan lemahnya fungsi pengaduan lembaga keuangan. Studi ini menyoroti perlunya sosialisasi regulasi dan penguatan unit perlindungan konsumen di sektor jasa keuangan. Implikasi penelitian ini penting bagi pembuat kebijakan dan praktisi hukum untuk merumuskan klausul force majeure yang lebih kontekstual serta SOP pemberian keringanan kredit yang adil dan transparan. Penelitian ini juga merekomendasikan pendekatan selektif dalam pemberian restrukturisasi guna menjaga stabilitas sektor keuangan sambil tetap menghormati hak-hak debitur.
The identification of beneficial owners through the application of the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil by judges Zulmawan, Wawan; Khaliza, Ashila Raisya; Suhendra, Christabel Daniella; Pongsirinding, Fisa Ande’; Inly, Naomi; Dante, Russell; Pendang, Serlita Ruben
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 6 No. 5 (2026): May 2026
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v6i5.1820

Abstract

Corporate crime, such as corruption, is currently on the rise, one example being the practice of concealing identities through the pretext of beneficial ownership and nominee agreements. This issue requires law enforcement to focus not only on the formal corporate structure but also on tracing the parties who actually control and benefit from the corporation. This study aims to analyze the legal status of nominee agreements and the importance of beneficial ownership transparency in closing loopholes in corporate law in Indonesia. It also analyzes the application of the "piercing the corporate veil" doctrine in Supreme Court Decision Number 4950 K/Pid.Sus/2023. The method used in this research is normative juridical, using statutory, conceptual, and case study approaches. This study explains that although regulations regarding beneficial ownership exist, their implementation is still not fully implemented, primarily due to low awareness of reporting compliance and the continued prevalence of nominee practices. Based on existing decisions, the Supreme Court outlines a more progressive approach by applying the "piercing the corporate veil" doctrine to hold beneficial owners criminally liable, even if they are not listed in the company structure. This shifts from a normative approach to the application of substantive law. Therefore, there is a need for strengthening regulations, increasing oversight, and ensuring data integrity between institutions so that transparency and accountability of beneficial owners can truly be realized and are no longer exploited as loopholes for corruption. Keywords: beneficial owner, corporate corruption, criminal liability, nominee agreement, piercing the corporate veil.
Co-Authors Dante, Russell Inly, Naomi Khaliza, Ashila Raisya Parhusip, Naomi Inly Pendang, Serlita Ruben Pongsirinding, Fisa Ande’ Raisya, Ashila Sastraatmaja, Keisha Nadine Wawan Zulmawan