Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Systematic Literature Review: Dampak Kebijakan Perumahan Subsidi terhadap Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Berpenghasilan Rendah Rahmat Perdana Rasuanto; Agus Triyono; HS Tisnanta; FX Sumarja; Satria Prayoga
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 3 No 3 (2025): 2025
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v3i3.1388

Abstract

Dalam konteks pembangunan perkotaan dan pengentasan kemiskinan, akses terhadap perumahan layak bagi masyarakat berpenghasilan rendah merupakan isu strategis yang memerlukan perhatian serius. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji secara sistematis dampak kebijakan perumahan subsidi terhadap kesejahteraan masyarakat berdasarkan literatur ilmiah global. Metode yang digunakan adalah Systematic Literature Review (SLR) terhadap 634 artikel dari database Scopus periode 2020–2025, serta analisis bibliometrik menggunakan VOSviewer untuk mengidentifikasi tren dan tema utama. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa kebijakan perumahan subsidi efektif meningkatkan kesejahteraan melalui perbaikan kondisi ekonomi, rasa aman, dan akses terhadap layanan dasar seperti pendidikan dan kesehatan, terutama di wilayah dengan tata kelola dan infrastruktur yang baik. Namun, tantangan masih ditemukan dalam aspek distribusi dan kualitas bangunan. Penelitian terdahulu juga menekankan pentingnya perencanaan partisipatif dan kolaborasi lintas sektor agar kebijakan perumahan subsidi dapat lebih inklusif, adaptif, dan berkelanjutan dalam mendukung pengurangan kesenjangan sosial dan pembangunan kota yang berkeadilan.
Discretionary Authority of Government Officials: Between Administrative Efficiency and Potential Abuse of Authority Satria Prayoga
Journal of Law and Policy Transformation Vol 10 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Internasional Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37253/jlpt.v10i1.10451

Abstract

Discretion is the authority held by government officials to make decisions in situations that are not expressly regulated by laws and regulations. This authority is important in supporting the efficiency of government administration, especially in dealing with urgent or unexpected conditions. However, on the other hand, discretion also opens up opportunities for abuse of authority if it is not accompanied by the principles of prudence, accountability, and adequate supervision. This study aims to analyze the duality of the role of discretion in government practice, by highlighting its benefits in increasing bureaucratic agility and the potential risks that can harm the principles of good governance. The method used is a normative study with an approach to laws and regulations, legal doctrine, and case studies. The results of the study indicate that strengthening internal and external oversight mechanisms, as well as fostering public administration ethics, are strategic steps to maintain balance