Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal IBLAM Law Review Jurnal Locus Penelitian dan Pengabdian Jurnal Yustitia Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society
Mukminah, Lily Solichul
Unknown Affiliation
Aerospace Engineering Automotive Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Electrical & Electronics Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
PEMIDANAAN TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA: URGENSI PENDEKATAN RESTORATIF DALAM SISTEM HUKUM INDONESIA Kamaluddin, Moh; Mukminah, Lily Solichul
Jurnal Yustitia Vol 26, No 1 (2025): YUSTITIA
Publisher : Universitas Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53712/yustitia.v26i1.2675

Abstract

AbstrakPemidanaan terhadap tindak pidana narkotika di Indonesia cenderung berfokus pada pendekatan represif dan retributif, yang menempatkan pemenjaraan sebagai solusi utama. Namun, pendekatan ini terbukti tidak efektif dalam mengurangi angka residivisme dan justru berkontribusi pada overcrowding di lembaga pemasyarakatan. Selain itu, pemidanaan semacam ini seringkali tidak membedakan dengan jelas antara pengguna narkotika yang butuh rehabilitasi dengan pengedar atau bandar narkotika yang memiliki peran berbeda dalam tindak pidana tersebut. Dalam konteks ini, pendekatan restoratif yang lebih menekankan pada pemulihan pelaku melalui rehabilitasi medis dan sosial menjadi semakin relevan. Pendekatan ini tidak hanya berfokus pada penghukuman, tetapi juga pada reintegrasi sosial dan pemulihan pelaku untuk mengurangi dampak negatif penyalahgunaan narkotika. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penerapan pemidanaan narkotika dalam sistem hukum Indonesia serta mengkaji urgensi dan potensi penerapan pendekatan restoratif dalam menangani kasus narkotika. Temuan penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa sistem pemidanaan yang ada saat ini perlu direvisi dengan membuka ruang formal bagi pendekatan restoratif. Oleh karena itu, disarankan agar regulasi yang mengatur narkotika diperbarui untuk memungkinkan penerapan rehabilitasi lebih luas, serta memperkuat kapasitas aparat hukum dan fasilitas rehabilitasi. Selain itu, kampanye nasional untuk mengubah paradigma penanganan kasus narkotika menjadi penting guna meningkatkan kesadaran masyarakat tentang pentingnya rehabilitasi bagi pecandu narkotika.Kata Kunci: Pemidanaan, narkotika, pendekatan restoratif.
Praperadilan Penetapan Status Tersangka Tidak Melalui Prosedur Yang Sah dan Patut Dalam Dugaan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Mukminah, Lily Solichul
Jurnal Locus Penelitian dan Pengabdian Vol. 4 No. 4 (2025): JURNAL LOCUS: Penelitian & Pengabdian
Publisher : Riviera Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58344/locus.v4i4.4316

Abstract

Pretrial is an institution that was born due to Law No. 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). In Article 1 number 10 of the Criminal Code, it is stated that Pretrial is the authority of the District Court to examine and decide on the legality of the termination of the investigation or prosecution an the request for compensation or rehabilitation, all of which can be done at the request of the suspect or his family or legal representative for the sake of upholding the law and justice. The Constitutional Court has expanded the object of pretrial including the legality or not of the determination of suspects, searches and seizures. This research was conducted to examine the decision of the Court Number: 12/Pid.Pra/2024/PN Ptk regarding the determination of suspect status in the alleged corruption of Land Acquisition at the West Kalimantan Provincial Regional Development Bank BANK BANK KALBAR in 2015. As for the problem, (1) What is the basis for the judge's consideration of canceling the suspect's status? (2) What are the legal consequences of the pretrial decision? In this study, the author uses normative legal research methods with a case approach, a conceptual approach, and a legislative approach. The sources of legal materials include primary legal materials in the form of the Criminal Code, Law No. 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law No. 20 of 2001, and Law No. 48 of 2009, secondary legal materials in the form of books, literature and legal journals related to problems, as well as tertiary legal materials in the form of KBBI, Legal Dictionary, and subsequently qualitatively analyzed and presented in analytical descriptive form. A person who is suspected of committing a criminal act of corruption who is summoned as a witness, must be examined as a witness, and if his status is raised as a suspect, then he must go through a valid and correct procedure, namely a case title is carried out first, then summoned as a suspect, and then can be detained, except for the procedure for the case of being arrested. The determination of suspect status that is not carried out through legal and correct procedures will result in the determination of the suspect's status being invalid.
Legal Review Regarding the Application of Criminal Sanctions for Acts of Defamation Through Social Media Mukminah, Lily Solichul
Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society (May)
Publisher : Metromedia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research examines the impact of imposing criminal sanctions on defamation through social media on society at large. Using a normative juridical research method, analysis is conducted on relevant legal regulations and the elements involved in defamation. The study highlights the importance of imposing criminal sanctions as an instrument to uphold justice, prevent similar actions in the future, and consider the psychological and social impacts on victims and perpetrators. By understanding the deterrence effect of criminal sanctions and evaluating their effectiveness, this research contributes to a comprehensive understanding of the role of legal enforcement in addressing defamation issues in the digital era. It provides insights into the complexities of defamation cases in the online realm and underscores the significance of legal measures in safeguarding individual rights and maintaining societal integrity in the face of evolving digital communication platforms.
THE IMPORTANCE OF REGULATING NON-CONCIVTION BASED FORFEITURE IN CORRUPTION CASES IN INDONESIA Mukminah, Lily Solichul; Hartiwiningsih, Hartiwiningsih; Yudianto, Otto; Hufron, Hufron
IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): IBLAM LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v3i2.125

Abstract

This research examines the importance of regulating Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture (NCB) in corruption cases in Indonesia. NCB is a mechanism of asset forfeiture that allows the state to seize assets without a prior criminal conviction. The study argues that the regulation of NCB is necessary to ensure the effectiveness of asset recovery in corruption cases and to prevent abuse of power by law enforcement agencies. The research uses a qualitative approach and analyzes relevant laws and regulations, court decisions, and academic literature. The findings suggest that the current legal framework for NCB in Indonesia is inadequate, leading to the misuse of NCB by law enforcement agencies. The research recommends the enactment of a specific law on NCB in corruption cases that provides clear criteria and safeguards for the use of this mechanism.
Co-Authors Hartiwiningsih Hartiwiningsih Hufron Hufron, Hufron Moh Kamaluddin Otto Yudianto