Sedyo, Nastiti Respati
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Pelanggaran Etika dan Profesi Hukum Kasus Suap Hakim Ronald Tannur: Analisis Kritis terhadap Integritas Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia Farbadi, Mayla Putri; Sianturi, Mouna Suez; Setiawan, Sekar Marchayu; Puteri, Rheyna Wisnu; Sirait, Priscila Hosiana Deandra; Sedyo, Nastiti Respati; M, Mulyadi
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 2 (2025): June
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15486554

Abstract

This case shows how three judges of the Surabaya District Court were involved in bribery practices in the case of Gregorius Ronald Tannur's release. This article examines the bribery case of Judge Ronald Tannur as a reflection of ethical and professional issues in the legal field in Indonesia. The focus of this research is on how the ethical violations and breaches of the legal profession's code of ethics in that case have undermined the integrity of the Indonesian judicial system. This violates the principles of judicial independence and integrity regulated in Law No. 48/2009 on Judicial Power. This research shows the systemic consequences of such violations, such as a decline in public trust in the judicial system, an increase in perceptions of injustice, and challenges to the advancement of democracy and the rule of law. In addition, this article offers solutions to prevent the issues. This includes improving the internal-external oversight system, implementing a meritocracy system for the appointment of judges, and incorporating continuous professional ethics education. The results of this study indicate that structural reforms in the Indonesian judicial system are crucial for restoring public trust and ensuring the integrity of law enforcement.
Kedudukan Hukum PT Maspion Dalam Sengketa Perpanjangan Hak Guna Bangunan (HGB) di Atas Hak Pengelolaan (HPL) (Kasus Surabaya): Perspektif Kepastian Hukum dan Perlindungan Hak Rabiah, Salwa; Fedira, Revania; Sedyo, Nastiti Respati; Tarina, Dwi Desi Yayi
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 4 (2025): December
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17542915

Abstract

This study examines the legal status of Building Use Rights (HGB) over Management Rights (HPL) and its implications for legal certainty in Indonesia’s agrarian system through the case analysis of PT Maspion vs. Surabaya City Government. HGB over HPL is a derivative right dependent on the HPL holder’s authority but remains an independent right with economic value. The differing rulings between the Administrative Court and the Supreme Court reveal inconsistencies in legal interpretation, creating uncertainty for rights holders. Therefore, clearer and more comprehensive regulations on the extension mechanism of HGB over HPL are needed to ensure legal protection, fairness, and investment stability in land law.
Business Actors' Default in K-Pop Merchandise Purchase Agreements on Social Media Sedyo, Nastiti Respati; Sulastri, Sulastri
DE LEGA LATA: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM Vol 11, No 1 (2026): January-June
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30596/dll.v11i1.27124

Abstract

The rapid development of digital technology has transformed buying and selling transactions, including K-Pop merchandise trading through pre-order systems on social media. The pre-order system allows buyers to place and pay for orders before the goods are available. However, in practice, business actors often commit breaches of contract, such as delayed delivery, mismatched products, or unfulfilled refunds. This research aims to analyze the forms of breach of contract committed by business actors in K-Pop merchandise pre-order agreements and their legal consequences. The study uses a normative juridical method with a statutory and case approach, supported by literature review and data from real cases on social media platform X. The results show that business actors who fail to fulfill their contractual obligations are considered to have committed a breach of contract as stipulated in Article 1243 of the Indonesian Civil Code and are required to compensate the buyers for the losses. Dispute resolution can be pursued through both litigation and non-litigation means as regulated in Article 38 of Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions.