Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Jurnal Batavia
Rabiah, Salwa
Unknown Affiliation
Arts Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Netralitas Pejabat Negara: Etis dan Yuridis Sikap Wakil Bupati Garut Dalam Menghadapi Ormas Keagamaan Rabiah, Salwa; Afifa, Erina Nur; Rahman, Hafizh Aulia; Muttaqin, Sumayya; Khalila, Khalisa Putri; Khairiyah, Lina Husnul; R, Fathia Mahira; Andradit, Atthariq; M, Mulyadi
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article aims to examine the ethical and juridical aspects of the neutrality stance taken by the Vice Regent of Garut, Luthfianisa Putri Karlina, in response to the sweeping actions conducted by the Islamic Ummah Alliance (AUI) against eateries operating during the day in Ramadan 2025. The study analyzes the suitability of the Vice Regent's reprimand actions against the organization within the legal framework and principles of public official neutrality in Indonesia. Through a juridical-normative approach, the research identifies that despite the issuance of a Community Compliance Decree by Forkopimda and MUI of Garut Regency, the decree is merely advisory and lacks the binding legal force of a regional regulation. The findings show that the Vice Regent's actions in reprimanding the religious organization were carried out in accordance with the authority outlined in Garut Regent Regulation Number 202 A of 2009 and align with the principles of due process of law and interfaith tolerance values. The study highlights the importance of balancing the enforcement of religious norms and protecting citizens' rights to engage in economic activities, particularly in multicultural societies. This case underscores the dilemma faced by public officials in addressing demands from majority groups while upholding good governance principles. The research reveals that the Vice Regent's firmness in condemning intimidation strengthens the government's legitimacy as a protector of diversity and guarantor of social order and justice. The findings contribute to developing an ethical decision-making model for public officials facing socio-religious pressures in regional governance and enrich understanding of the boundaries of public officials' authority in maintaining neutrality, legal interests, and socio-religious dynamics.
PERAN HAK ANGKET DPR DALAM UPAYA PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA HASIL PEMILU Rabiah, Salwa; Nathanael, Hezki Nalom; Fauzyyah, Nabilah Putri
Jurnal BATAVIA Vol 1 No 2 (2024): MARET
Publisher : Zhata Institut

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64578/batavia.v1i2.33

Abstract

Abstrak Hak angket merupakan hak yang dimiliki oleh Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (DPR) untuk menyelidiki terkait sistem pemerintahan di Indonesia yang dianggap bertentangan dengan Undang-Undang. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis fungsi dan efektivitas hak angket Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat dalam menyelidiki penyelenggaraan pemilihan umum, dimana banyak beranggapan adanya tindak kecurangan dalam proses pemilihan umum. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode normatif empiris, dimana metode ini digunakan untuk menyelidiki kasus yang sedang terjadi atau prosesnya belum selesai. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa hak angket secara khusus diatur dalam Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 6 Tahun 1954 tentang Penetapan Hak Angket Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat. Hak angket Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat dapat dilaksanakan apabila hak itu telah diusulkan oleh Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat yang kemudian akan disidangkan untuk mendapatkan persetujuan dari anggota Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat. Fungsi hak angket Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat itu sendiri mewujudkan nilai demokrasi, yaitu mewakilkan hak masyarakat Indonesia. Maka dari itu, diperlukannya peran aktif dari Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat sebagai perwakilan rakyat dalam mengimplementasi hak demokrasi masyarakat dimana semua keresahan masyarakat terhadap sistem pemerintahan dapat diterima oleh Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat. Kata Kunci: Hak Angket, Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat, Pemilihan Umum. Abstract The right of inquiry is a right held by the House of Representatives (DPR) to investigate the government system in Indonesia that is considered contrary to the law. The purpose of this study is to analyze the function and effectiveness of the right of inquiry of the House of Representatives in investigating the conduct of general elections, where many assume fraud in the electoral process. The method used in this research is the empirical normative method, where this method is used to investigate cases that are happening or the process has not been completed. The results show that the right of inquiry is specifically regulated in Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6 Year 1954 on the Determination of the Right of Inquiry of the House of Representatives. The right of inquiry of the House of Representatives can be exercised if the right has been proposed by the House of Representatives which will then be heard for approval by members of the House of Representatives. The function of the House of Representatives' right of inquiry itself embodies the value of democracy, which is to represent the rights of the Indonesian people. Therefore, an active role is needed from the House of Representatives as the people's representative in implementing the people's democratic rights where all public concerns about the government system can be accepted by the House of Representatives. Keywords:Right of Inquiry, House of Representatives, General Election.
Kedudukan Hukum PT Maspion Dalam Sengketa Perpanjangan Hak Guna Bangunan (HGB) di Atas Hak Pengelolaan (HPL) (Kasus Surabaya): Perspektif Kepastian Hukum dan Perlindungan Hak Rabiah, Salwa; Fedira, Revania; Sedyo, Nastiti Respati; Tarina, Dwi Desi Yayi
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 4 (2025): December
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17542915

Abstract

This study examines the legal status of Building Use Rights (HGB) over Management Rights (HPL) and its implications for legal certainty in Indonesia’s agrarian system through the case analysis of PT Maspion vs. Surabaya City Government. HGB over HPL is a derivative right dependent on the HPL holder’s authority but remains an independent right with economic value. The differing rulings between the Administrative Court and the Supreme Court reveal inconsistencies in legal interpretation, creating uncertainty for rights holders. Therefore, clearer and more comprehensive regulations on the extension mechanism of HGB over HPL are needed to ensure legal protection, fairness, and investment stability in land law.
Co-Authors Afifa, Erina Nur Andradit, Atthariq Dwi Desi Yayi Tarina Fauzyyah, Nabilah Putri Fedira, Revania Khairiyah, Lina Husnul Khalila, Khalisa Putri Mulyadi M, Mulyadi Muttaqin, Sumayya Nathanael, Hezki Nalom R, Fathia Mahira Rahman, Hafizh Aulia Sedyo, Nastiti Respati