Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

The Politics of Hate Speech Akun Fufufafa: Perspektif Etika Komunikasi dan Dampaknya Terhadap Kohesi Sosial Marpaung, Hery Wahyudi; Sazali, Hasan
Jurnal Indonesia : Manajemen Informatika dan Komunikasi Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Mei
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM) STMIK Indonesia Banda Aceh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63447/jimik.v6i2.1437

Abstract

This study discusses the phenomenon of political hate speech carried out by anonymous accounts "fufufafa", focusing on the perspective of communication ethics and its impact on social cohesion. Through a qualitative approach and case study method, an analysis was carried out on the content of the account upload using a critical discourse framework. The results of the study show that hate speech conveyed is systematic, attacks the personal aspects of political figures, and is full of ideological content that emphasizes the moral dichotomy between "us" and "them." Communication strategies such as simplification, labeling, framing, and social agitation are used to negatively shape public opinion and reinforce polarization. From the point of view of communication ethics, the act reflects a moral deviation because it ignores the values of empathy, respect, and social responsibility in digital communication. The psychosocial impacts that are caused include the stigmatization of minority groups, emotional trauma to individuals, and fragmentation in online communities. This research emphasizes the importance of digital literacy, strengthening ethical communication regulations, and public participation to prevent the spread of hate speech and maintain social integration in digital democracy. These findings are expected to be an academic and practical contribution in developing strategies for handling hate speech in Indonesia.
Multitafsir UU ITE Sebagai Koridor Hukum: Studi Pada Intensitas User Conflicts di Media Sosial Marpaung, Hery Wahyudi; Sazali, Hasan
Jurnal Indonesia : Manajemen Informatika dan Komunikasi Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Mei
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM) STMIK Indonesia Banda Aceh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63447/jimik.v6i2.1438

Abstract

This study aims to examine the impact of multiple interpretations of articles in the Electronic Information and Transaction Law (ITE Law) on the intensity of conflicts between social media users. This study is motivated by the rise of legal cases that arise due to subjective interpretations of Article 27 paragraph (3) and Article 28 paragraph (2), which often lead to the criminalization of legitimate expression in the digital space. Using a qualitative method with a case study approach, data was collected through observation and documentation of digital conflict cases. The results of the study show that the multiple interpretations of these articles not only interfere with legal certainty, but also worsen the psychological condition of users and create inequality in law enforcement. This study also found that low digital literacy and the use of articles as a tool of repression also strengthen the escalation of conflicts on social media. Therefore, a participatory and contextual revision of the ITE Law is needed to ensure fair legal protection, while maintaining freedom of expression in the digital era. The conclusion of this study emphasizes the importance of establishing a digital legal corridor that is adaptive, inclusive, and in harmony with the communication dynamics of modern society in order to create a healthy, safe, and democratic public space.
Kontradiksi Agitasi Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia terhadap Konsep Politik Islam dalam Pembentukan Pandangan Bernegara Marpaung, Hery Wahyudi; Katimin, Katimin; Samosir, Hasrat Efendi
Jurnal Indonesia : Manajemen Informatika dan Komunikasi Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM) STMIK Indonesia Banda Aceh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63447/jimik.v6i3.1444

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji kontradiksi antara ideologi HTI dan prinsip politik Islam, khususnya penolakan terhadap demokrasi dan negara-bangsa. Dengan analisis wacana kritis, penelitian menelaah narasi HTI dalam teks resmi, publikasi digital, dan pernyataan tokohnya mengenai konsep khilafah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pandangan politik HTI bersifat rigid, eksklusif, dan mengabaikan nilai-nilai keislaman yang inklusif seperti musyawarah, keadilan, dan toleransi. Pandangan tersebut tidak sejalan dengan prinsip politik Islam yang tercermin dalam Piagam Madinah, yang menekankan kerja sama lintas kelompok dan pengakuan terhadap keberagaman. Agitasi HTI juga berdampak pada pembentukan kesadaran ideologis yang sempit dan polarisasi dalam masyarakat. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa ideologi HTI tidak hanya bertentangan dengan realitas sosial-politik Indonesia yang demokratis dan plural, tetapi juga menyalahi semangat politik Islam yang bersifat adaptif dan kontekstual. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan upaya akademik dan kebijakan yang responsif dan kritis terhadap penyebaran, maupun indikasi penyebaran, ideologi eksklusif yang bertentangan dengan nilai demokrasi Indonesia dan prinsip politik Islam demi menjaga kohesi sosial dan keutuhan bangsa.